Open Access

Lateral supraorbital approach applied to sellar tumors in 23 consecutive patients: the Suzhou experience from China

World Journal of Surgical Oncology201311:41

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-41

Received: 27 August 2012

Accepted: 7 February 2013

Published: 21 February 2013

Abstract

Background

Pituitary adenoma, craniopharyngioma and meningioma are common sellar lesions, accounting for more than 90% of sellar tumors. The aim of this study is to assess the reliability and safety of the lateral supraorbital (LSO) approach to remove sellar tumors.

Methods

Between June 2011 and December 2011, 23 patients with neoplastic lesions underwent surgery by the corresponding author (ZW) via the LSO approach. The clinical presentations, neuroradiological findings, microsurgical techniques, and outcome at discharge of these patients were analyzed. In addition, the clinical series in the available literature written in English were also extensively reviewed. Eleven (48%) patients were treated for pituitary adenoma; six (26%) patients for tuberculum sellae meningioma; and six (26%) patients for craniopharyngioma.

Results

Seemingly complete tumor removal was achieved in 21 patients (91%); surgical mortality was one patient (4.3%). Postoperatively, no patient had developed cerebrospinal fluid leakage or new visual deficits. One (4%) patient had intracranial infection, and one (4%) had a postoperative hematoma. The median Karnofsky score at discharge was 87.4 (range, 0 to 100). The Glasgow outcome scale at discharge was 4.6 (range, 1 to 5). Of all, 21 (91.3%) patients achieved favorable outcomes.

Conclusion

Sellar tumors can be removed via the LSO approach with relatively low morbidity and mortality. Surgical results with this fast and simple approach are similar to those obtained with more extensive, complex, and time-consuming approaches.

Keywords

Lateral supraorbital approach Pituitary adenoma Craniopharyngioma Meningioma

Background

Pituitary adenomas, craniopharyngiomas and tuberculum sellae meningioma, are by far the most common tumors of the sellar region, comprising 90% of all such tumors [1]. The majority of pituitary adenomas are asymptomatic, discovered as ‘incidentalomas’ in the course of investigation for other conditions. The remainder, along with other sellar tumors, present with symptoms of endocrine disorder, mass effect on adjacent structures - usually the optic nerves or chiasm, or headache [2]. Meningiomas of the sellar region consist of approximately 14% of the intracranial total, occurring on the tuberculum sella or planum sphenoidale, on the medial sphenoid wing and cavernous sinus [3]. Craniopharyngiomas comprise approximately 3% of all intracranial tumors. Although half of these occur in adults, they account for a greater percentage of childhood tumors (5 to 13%) and are responsible for 54% of sellar region pathology in children. There are important differences in clinical presentation, pathology and outcome between children and adults [4].

Although the standard pterional approach is considered the gold standard neurosurgical route to reach the sellar area, this approach requires manipulation of the temporalis muscle. This maneuver may be associated with significant atrophy of the muscle as well as with different degrees of dysfunction of the frontal branch of the facial nerve [5]. Several surgical modifications have been suggested to reduce this potential problem. The lateral supraorbital (LSO) approach described by Hernesniemi et al. is one such alternative approach. Hernesniemi et al. propose this approach to operate on intracranial lesions located in the sellar and suprasellar regions, in the Sylvian fissure, and in the retrosellar regions such as the superior part of the basilar artery and the interpeduncular fossa [6, 7]. This modified technique has the advantages of requiring a short skin incision that does not reach the front of the ear, unlike the incision when using the standard pterional approach, thus causing less trauma to the temporalis muscle. Additionally, there is no risk of injury to the upper branch of the facial nerve because the use of a myocutaneous flap protects this nerve. This incision also has an excellent cosmetic result because it is usually hidden behind the hair line [8].

However, until now there has been no clinical report published concerning the LSO approach applied to pituitary adenoma and craniopharyngioma, and also no study was found in the literature on the LSO approach and sellar tumors in China. For this article, we reviewed the characteristics and outcome of 23 patients with sellar lesions operated on by the senior author (ZW) using the LSO approach between June 2011 and December 2011 at the Department of Neurosurgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China. We demonstrate that these tumors can be removed by using the simple and fast LSO approach, with results comparable to those obtained using more extensive surgical approaches.

Methods

Twenty-three patients with sellar tumors were treated by lateral supraorbital (LSO) procedures. All operations were performed by the same surgeon (ZW) at the Department of Neurosurgery of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, China. Patients’ medical records, clinical visits, and imaging studies were reviewed and data on tumor characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and surgical outcomes of patients were collected. All patients had at least a six-month follow-up clinic visit and computed tomography (CT) scans. Patients with tumors approached by a conventional frontotemporal route or endonasal route were not included in this analysis. This retrospective study was approved by Soochow University.

Patient files and radiological data were reviewed. The demographics and clinical findings are presented in Table 1. Of the 23 patients, 12 (52%) were women and 11 (48%) were men, with a median age of 53 years (range, 4 to 78 years). The preoperative and postoperative clinical conditions were expressed by the Karnofsky performance scale [9], and the Glasgow outcome scale [10] was used to reflect the postoperative clinical outcome.
Table 1

Summary of our cases

Case number

Age/Sex

Diagnosis

Maximum tumor diameter (mm)

Tumor location

Prior surgery

Cavernous sinus invasion/vascular encasement

Extent of resection

Visual changes

GOS at discharge

Karnofsky score at discharge

Follow-up (months)

1

70/F

PA

31

S, SS

0

0

Total

5

100

17

2

78/M

PA

35

RC, S,

0

Yes

Near

4

80

12

    

SS

  

Total

    

3

63/M

PA

27

S,SS

0

0

Total

5

100

11

4

69/M

PA

33

S,SS

0

0

Total

5

100

12

5

12/M

PA

26

S,SS

0

0

Total

5

100

14

6

48/F

PA

30

RC,S,

0

0

Total

5

100

13

    

SS

       

7

55/M

PA

40

RC,S

Yes

Yes

Near

4

80

12

    

SS

  

Total

    

8

76/M

PA

30

S,SS

Yes

0

Total

4

80

13

9

42/F

PA

42

RC,S

0

Yes

Subtotal

5

100

12

    

SS

       

10

47/F

PA

36

S,SS

0

0

Total

5

100

13

11

60/M

PA

32

S,SS

0

Yes

Total

5

100

12

12

29/M

CR

40

RC, S

0

Yes

Near

4

80

13

13

31/M

CR

34

RC, S, SS

0

0

Total

5

100

11

14

62/F

CR

36

RC, S, SS, Ext

0

Yes

Near Total

4

80

12

15

45/F

CR

29

S, SS

0

0

Total

5

100

12

16

56/F

CR

35

RC, S, SS

0

0

Near Total

5

100

13

17

4/F

CR

23

RC, S, SS

Yes

0

Subtotal

5

100

12

18

64/F

TSM

32

SS, Ext

0

Yes

Total

5

100

11

19

27/F

TSM

35

SS

0

0

Total

5

100

12

20

43/M

TSM

43

SS

0

Yes

Near Total

3

30

11

21

53/M

TSM

32

S, SS

0

0

Total

5

100

14

22

57/F

TSM

39

SS, Ext

0

Yes

Total

1

0

0

23

55/F

TSM

36

SS

0

0

Total

5

100

10

Note: PA,pituitary adenoma; CR, craniopharyngioma; TSM, tuberculum sellae meningioma; GOS, Glasgow outcome scale; RC, retrochiasmal; SS, suprasellar; S, sellar; Ext, extensive; ↑, improved postoperative vision; ↓, worsened postoperative vision; →, preoperative visual impairment not improved; ↔, no visual impairment pre- or postoperatively.

The LSO approach is a less invasive modification of the pterional approach, located more frontally and with a bone flap of approximately 3 cm in diameter. It was first created and used by Juha Hernesniemi from Helsinki University Central Hospital for vascular and neoplastic lesions of the anterior cranial base and has been described in detail previously [11].

Briefly, the head fixed to the head frame is 1) elevated well above the level of the heart, 2) rotated 20 to 30 degrees toward the opposite side, and 3) tilted laterally for optimal visualization of the attachments of the tumor. The neck of the patient is slightly flexed to obtain a better view of the anterior part of the sellar region. We adjusted the position of the fixed head and body during the operation as needed [12]. Usually, a small LSO craniotomy is all that is necessary. A single burr hole is placed just under the temporal line of the bone, that is, the superior insertion of the temporal muscle. A 3 cm bone flap is detached mostly by a side-cutting drill, and the basal part can be drilled before lifting. The dura is incised curvilinearly with the base sphenoidally. Dural edges are elevated by multiple stitches extended over the craniotomy dressings. From this point onward, all surgery is performed under the operating microscope.

Slack brain is achieved by both neuroanesthesia and intraoperative release of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [13]. The floor of the anterior cranial base is followed toward the ipsilateral optic nerve and carotid artery, and CSF is released from the basal cisterns. In our experience, opening the Sylvian fissure is not necessary but if needed for larger tumors, it can be easily performed via the LSO approach, as reported by previous studies [14]. After opening of the basal cisterns, having achieved a slack brain and more space under the frontal lobe, dissection is directed medially toward the dural attachments of the tumor. Devascularization of the tumor is performed with bipolar coagulation of the whole dural attachment, taking care to preserve the surrounding structures.

The classic LSO approach has been described in detail in Hernesniemi’s reports [7]. In the present study, it was applied in 17 cases (74%). In the classic LSO approach, the Sylvian fissure remains at the inferior border of the dural opening and, if needed, it can be easily opened. In six cases (26%) we performed a LSO approach with temporal extension, that is, the classic LSO approach with additional lateral extension toward the middle cranial fossa for a minimal temporal exposure. This means extending the exposure for approximately 1 cm or so to the temporal side of the Sylvian fissure. The head position is the same as in a classic LSO approach but with a more caudal and posterior skin-muscle cut. The size of the tumor with a significant temporal component is the only indication for temporal extension of the LSO approach (Figure 1).
Figure 1

(A) the operative incision of LSO; (B) the dura was opened; (C) skull reconstruction; (D) suturation after LSO surgery.

Results

LSO approach applied to pituitary adenoma

Of the eleven cases, none (0%) were large (> 6 cm), nine (82%) medium (3 to 6 cm), and two (18%) small (< 3 cm). The average tumor size was 3.3 cm (range, 2.7 to 4.2 cm). Most cases (n = 7, 64%) were removed via a right (nondominant) LSO approach, which is more convenient for a right-handed neurosurgeon even if the tumor extends more to the left side. In four patients (36%), the approach was from the left, because of marked tumor extension to the left. As shown in Figure 2 (case number 9) and Table 1, total removal of the tumor was achieved in eight (73%) of eleven patients. The Karnofsky score at discharge was 80 to 100 and the GOS was 4 to 5, which meant the outcome was relatively good. Figure 3 shows the post-operative MR images of case number 10, which demonstrates that the tumor had been totally removed.
Figure 2

Case number 9: Sagittal (A), axial (B), and coronal (C) view of contrasted magnetic resonance imaging showing a pituitary adenoma. (D) Postoperative CT imaging of the same patient.

Figure 3

Case number 10: Axial (A-B) and coronal (C-D) view of contrasted magnetic resonance imaging showing total removal of pituitary adenoma.

LSO approach applied to craniopharyngioma

As shown in Table 1, six patients underwent a supraorbital craniotomy. Maximal tumor size was 40 mm. Five (83%) had a major tumor component within the retrochiasmal space. Out of six patients, gross total, near total, and subtotal resection were achieved in two patients (33%), three patients (50%), and one patient (17%), respectively (Figure 4, case number 12). As shown in Table 1, preoperative visual loss resolved in three patients (50%) and was unchanged in two patients (33%) after LSO surgery. Four patients (one with subtotal resection and three with near total resection) received postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy and remained stable at last follow-up, ranging from 12 to 13 months. The Karnofsky score at discharge was 80 to 100 and the GOS was 4 to 5, which meant the outcome was relatively good. Figure 5 shows the post-operative MR images of case number 13, which demonstrates that the tumor had been totally removed.
Figure 4

Case number 12: (A) preoperative CT imaging showing the calcification of craniopharyngioma; (B-D) contrasted magnetic resonance imaging showing a craniopharyngioma; (E-H) postoperative CT imaging of the same patient.

Figure 5

Case number 13: Axial (A-B) and coronal (C-D) view of contrasted magnetic resonance imaging showing total removal of craniopharyngioma.

LSO approach applied to tuberculum sellae meningioma

As shown in Table 1, six underwent supraorbital removal. Of patients undergoing LSO surgery, total/near total removal (> 90%) was achieved in six (100%) of six patients. Of patients treated by LSO approach removal, preoperative visual loss resolved in three (50%) of six patients, was unchanged in two patient (33%), and worsened in one (17%) of six patients (Table 1). Of six patients who had LSO meningioma removal, four had total removal of noninvasive tumors (Figure 6, case number 20), and none had tumor recurrence at a median follow-up of six months. The Karnofsky score at discharge was 0 to 100 and the GOS was 1 to 5, which meant the outcome was relatively acceptable. One patient died from postoperative bleeding and one patient’s GOS was 3 at discharge because of infarction in the sellar region. Figure 7 showed the preoperative MR images and postoperative CT images of case number 22, which was the case who died, and revealed a hemorrhage of the sellar region.
Figure 6

Case number 20: Axial (A), and coronal (B) view of contrasted magnetic resonance imaging showing a tuberculum sellae meningioma. (C-D) Postoperative CT imaging of the same patient.

Figure 7

Case number 22: (A-D) view of contrasted magnetic resonance imaging showing a tuberculum sellae meningioma. (E-G) view of CT images showing a hematoma in the sellar region.

LSO approach applied to a rare case (intracranial optic nerve Schwannoma)

The patient was a 57-year-old female who presented with complaints of increasingly impaired vision of the left eye. Neurological exam revealed mild impaired vision of left eye, but was otherwise unremarkable. MRI scan shows an approximately 2.5 cm well-demarcated lesion in the left superior sellar region (Figure 8). We performed a LSO approach for this patient, and the surgery was all right, in which we can see the tumor was from the left foramen opticum and was totally removed after opening the foramen opticum. The pathological diagnosis was Schwannoma and immunohistochemical testing showed Vimentin (+), S-100 (+), MBP (+), CD56 (+), GFAP (+), Ki-67 (+), Desmin (−), SMA (−), EMA (−), CD34 (positive in tumor vessels). The postoperative MR images are shown in Figure 8, and demonstrate that the tumor had been totally removed.
Figure 8

(A-B), preoperative MRI showing an intracranial optic nerve Schwannoma; (C-D) view of contrasted magnetic resonance imaging showing total removal of tumor.

Discussion

In this article, we have analyzed the clinical outcome and surgical complications of our recent consecutive series of 23 patients who have undergone surgery through the LSO approach for the treatment of neoplastic lesions in the sellar region. This was with the aim of 1) comparing the outcome of our series with other published series using different (generally more extensive) approaches and 2) understanding the technical nuances mostly affecting outcome; because of the vicinity of the optic nerve to the tumor, visual outcome is the most pertinent issue in this regard.

The most frequent approach for sellar tumors reported in the literature is the pterional one [15]. The microsurgical technique for sellar tumors through a pterional approach for the treatment of pituitary adenoma has been described in detail by other colleagues [16]. The standard pterional approach has been accepted as the gold standard in order to gain strategic access to a range of neurosurgical intracranial lesions [17]. Yasargil et al. [18] advocate this approach to achieve surgical control of the anterior circulation as well as basilar tip aneurysms. Although it is the preferred approach to treat various intracranial lesions, the standard pterional approach has been recently re-evaluated critically and compared with other approaches such as the supraorbital eyebrow incision approach, the mini-pterional approach, the mini-supraorbital approach, and the LSO approach [8]. Knowing the limitations of these procedures helps to determine the correct indications for each procedure, and using the advantageous features of these approaches will help to deliver the treatment that is the most appropriate for each individual patient.

Recently, previous reports have shown the surgical experience of Juha Hernesniemi in operating on olfactory groove [12], anterior clinoidal [14], and tuberculum sellae meningiomas through a LSO approach [6]. Hernesniemi has used the LSO approach instead of the pterional one for the past 25 years (Table 2). In larger tumors or giant aneurysms involving the medial sphenoid wing, the LSO approach can be modified with a 1 cm temporal extension to fully visualize the Sylvian fissure with its temporal portion [6]. The LSO approach is less traumatic, much faster, and simpler than the classic pterional approach and allows the surgeon to easily reach the sellar region [7]. The orbitozygomatic approach, also widely used and described in the context of sellar surgery in the literature [19] is, in our opinion, even more traumatic than the pterional one and needlessly extensive.
Table 2

Summary of the previous clinical reports on the LSO approach

Year

Operator

Institute

Disease

Case SUM

Follow-up time

Outcome

2012 [6]

Juha Hernesniemi

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Tuberculum sellae meningiomas

52

59 Months

Good

2012 [7]

Juha Hernesniemi

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Aneurysm, tumor, CCF

82

Not reported

Good

2012 [14]

Juha Hernesniemi

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Aneurysm, tumor, CCF

82

Not reported

Good

2011 [13]

Juha Hernesniemi

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Meningioma

191

Not reported

Good

   

Anterior clinoidal

   

2011 [20]

Juha Hernesniemi

Helsinki University Central Hospital

meningiomas

73

36 Months

Good

   

Olfactory groove

   

2009 [12]

Juha Hernesniemi

Helsinki University Central Hospital

meningiomas

66

45 Months

Good

2005 [11]

Juha Hernesniemi

Helsinki University Central Hospital

Sellar lesions

> 2000

Not reported

Good

The only experimental study on the LSO approach not conducted by Hernesniemi’s team was published in 2010 by Dr. Asem Salma from the Ohio State University Medical Center [8]. In that research, the authors provided a qualitative and quantitative anatomical comparison of the surgical exposure and the operability afforded by the standard pterional approach and the LSO approach. From an anatomical point of view, both approaches provide similar exposure to the sellar, suprasellar, and anterior communicating artery areas. The pterional approach provides better exposure of the retrosellar area. The ability to operate in the retrosellar area, as judged by their model, was higher with the pterional than with the LSO approach. On the basis of that study, the LSO approach would be anatomically indicated mainly for treating sellar and suprasellar lesions and anterior communicating artery aneurysms, where it could be used as a less invasive approach to these areas than the standard pterional approach. However, the standard pterional approach, by virtue of the shape and volume of its surgical space, could offer greater overall theoretical surgical operability. Hence, the standard pterional approach is anatomically suited for complex lesions of the sellar and parasellar spaces, especially when these lesions involve the interpeduncular cistern. Even with the intrinsic limitations of a cadaver environment, the results of our study highlight differences between the two approaches considered. In addition, our study proposes a helpful methodology to describe and contrast microneurosurgical approaches in a laboratory environment.

For the case of the patient who died, post-CT scanning demonstrated a hemorrhage of the sellar region. Following rapid surgical re-exploration, the patient initially survived, but after this second operation, complications including coagulation disorder, coma, hyperpyrexia, and electrolyte disturbances developed and three days after the surgery, the patient passed away. For LSO surgery, we should try our best to release CSF from the lateral fissure cistern, suprasellar cistern, and chiasmatic cistern to help decrease the pressure on the brain.

During the whole surgical process, neurosurgeons should try to prevent brain contusion caused by the brain spatula by keeping their hands light and soft, and performing the operations through the crevice of brain under the microscope. Sufficient understanding of the anatomical structures in the sellar region is a necessary condition for neurosurgeons to perform the LSO approach. In pituitary adenoma cases, we always found poor development of the sphenoidal sinus and in some cases the space of the saddle area was very small. So for these patients, we will choose an LSO approach to remove the tumor. On the other hand, some pituitary adenomas were mainly located at the suprasellar region and exhibited the ‘hourglass sign’. For these patients, we previously chose to use trans-longitudinal fissure, subfrontal, or pterion approaches, which might cause more brain injury to the patients than the LSO approach.

Conclusion

In summary, with the simple and fast LSO approach for surgery of sellar tumors, our surgical results and tumor recurrence rates at follow-up are similar to those obtained using more extensive and time-consuming approaches. The LSO approach can be used for sellar lesions of all sizes and has a relatively low morbidity and mortality. Based on our experience, we recommend the LSO approach for surgery of sellar tumors.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this report and any accompanying images.

Abbreviations

CSF: 

cerebrospinal fluid

CT: 

computed tomography

GOS: 

Glasgow outcome scale

LSO: 

lateral supraorbital

MRI: 

magnetic resonance imaging

PA: 

pituitary adenoma

RC: 

retrochiasmal

S: 

sellar

SS: 

suprasellar.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (number 81171105, 81271300, and 81100872), Jiangsu Province’s Outstanding Medical Academic Leader program (number LJ201139), the national key Technology R&D program for the 12th five-year plan of the People’s Republic of China (2011BAI08B05 and 2011BAI08B06), and grants from Education Department of Jiangsu Province (number 11KJB320011) and Suzhou Government (number SYS201109).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

References

  1. Dusick JR, Fatemi N, Mattozo C, McArthur D, Cohan P, Wang C, Swerdloff RS, Kelly DF: Pituitary function after endonasal surgery for nonadenomatous parasellar tumors: Rathke’s cleft cysts, craniopharyngiomas, and meningiomas. Surg Neurol. 2008, 70: 482-490. 10.1016/j.surneu.2008.03.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Teasdale G: Surgical management of pituitary adenoma. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983, 12: 789-823. 10.1016/S0300-595X(83)80065-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Laun A, Lenzen J, Hildebrandt G, Schachenmayr W: Tuberculum sellae meningioma and hypophyseal adenoma in a woman. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1993, 54: 119-124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Stamm AC, Vellutini E, Balsalobre L: Craniopharyngioma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2011, 44: 937-952. 10.1016/j.otc.2011.06.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Aydin IH, Takci E, Kadioglu HH, Kayaoglu CR, Tüzün Y: Pitfalls in the pterional approach to the parasellar area (review). Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1995, 38: 146-152. 10.1055/s-2008-1053475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Romani R, Laakso A, Kangasniemi M, Niemelä M, Hernesniemi J: Lateral supraorbital approach applied to tuberculum sellae meningiomas: experience with 52 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2012, 70: 1504-1519. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31824a36e8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Romani R, Elsharkawy A, Laakso A, Kangasniemi M, Hernesniemi J: Tailored anterior clinoidectomy through the lateral supraorbital approach: experience with 82 consecutive patients. World Neurosurg. 2012, 77: 512-517. 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.07.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Salma A, Alkandari A, Sammet S, Ammirati M: Lateral supraorbital approach versus pterional approach: an anatomic qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Neurosurgery. 2011, 68: 364-372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Elder JB, Chiocca EA: Low Karnofsky performance scale score and glioblastoma multiforme. J Neurosurg. 2011, 115: 217-218. 10.3171/2010.9.JNS101438.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kosty J, Macyszyn L, Lai K, McCroskery J, Park HR, Stein SC: Relating quality of life to Glasgow outcome scale health states. J Neurotrauma. 2012, 29: 1322-1327. 10.1089/neu.2011.2222.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hernesniemi J, Ishii K, Niemelä M, Smrcka M, Kivipelto L, Fujiki M, Shen H: Lateral supraorbital approach as an alternative to the classical pterional approach. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005, 94: 17-21. 10.1007/3-211-27911-3_4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Romani R, Lehecka M, Gaal E, Toninelli S, Celik O, Niemelä M, Porras M, Jääskeläinen J, Hernesniemi J: Lateral supraorbital approach applied to olfactory groove meningiomas: experience with 66 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2009, 65: 39-52. 10.1227/01.NEU.0000346266.69493.88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Romani R, Silvasti-Lundell M, Laakso A, Tuominen H, Hernesniemi J, Niemi T: Slack brain in meningioma surgery through lateral supraorbital approach. Surg Neurol Int. 2011, 2: 167-10.4103/2152-7806.90029.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Romani R, Elsharkawy A, Laakso A, Kangasniemi M, Hernesniemi J: Complications of anterior clinoidectomy through lateral supraorbital approach. World Neurosurg. 2013, In pressGoogle Scholar
  15. Arifin MZ, Mardjono I, Sidabutar R, Wirjomartani BA, Faried A: Pterional approach versus unilateral frontal approach on tuberculum sellae meningioma: single centre experiences. Asian J Neurosurg. 2012, 7: 21-24. 10.4103/1793-5482.95691.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Antić B, Tadić R, Marković L, Tavcar I: Surgical treatment of hypophyseal adenoma using the pterional approach. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2000, 57: 171-174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans T, Johns H: The frontotemporal (‘pterional’) approach - an historical perspective. Neurosurgery. 2013, In pressGoogle Scholar
  18. Yasargil MG, Antic J, Laciga R, Jain KK, Hodosh RM, Smith RD: Microsurgical pterional approach to aneurysms of the basilar bifurcation. Surg Neurol. 1976, 6: 83-91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Youssef AS, Willard L, Downes A, Olivera R, Hall K, Agazzi S, van Loveren H: The frontotemporal-orbitozygomatic approach: reconstructive technique and outcome. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012, 154: 1275-1283. 10.1007/s00701-012-1370-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Romani R, Laakso A, Kangasniemi M, Lehecka M, Hernesniemi J: Lateral supraorbital approach applied to anterior clinoidal meningiomas: experience with 73 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2011, 68: 1632-1647. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318214a840.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chen et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement