Open Access

Obstructive jaundice due to ampullary metastasis of renal cell carcinoma

  • Andreas Karakatsanis1Email author,
  • Antonios Vezakis1,
  • Georgios Fragulidis1,
  • Chryssa Staikou2,
  • Eleni E Carvounis3 and
  • Andreas Polydorou1
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201311:262

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-262

Received: 7 February 2013

Accepted: 19 September 2013

Published: 7 October 2013

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma is often characterized by the presence of metachronous metastases in unusual sites. The presence of isolated metastases is treated with surgical excision with good anticipated results. On the other hand, systemic chemotherapy is administered in the context of metastatic spread, usually sunitib or sorafenib. In such cases, however, the presence of symptomatic foci calls for minimal intervention.

We present a case of a 77-year-old patient who presented with obstructive jaundice due to an ampullary mass. Endoscopic excision and biopsy set the diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Consequently, imaging studies revealed the presence of multiple foci in the lungs and bone. Therefore, pancreatoduodenectomy was excluded and the patient underwent endoscopic ampullectomy and was set to oral sunitinib. Interestingly, despite generalized spread, local control was achieved until the patient succumbed to carcinomatosis.

Painless obstructive jaundice in a patient with history of renal cancer and negative computed tomography scanning for pancreatic or other causes of obstruction should alert for prompt investigation for an ampullary metastasis.

Background

Obstructive jaundice is one of the most typical clinical signs caused by inflammation, gallstones or tumors of the periampullary region. Painless and progressive rise of serum bilirubin, however, is mostly attributed to tumorigenic entities, rather than inflammatory processes.

Case presentation

A 77-year-old male presented with painless obstructive jaundice. He had a history of right nephrectomy for a T2N0M0 renal clear cell carcinoma 3 years ago. Ultrasound and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scanning depicted the common bile duct dilated up to its distal end. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) revealed an ampullary tumor (Figure 1). Consequently, ampullectomy with endoscopic sphincterotomy and placement of a plastic 10 Fr biliary stent were performed (Figure 2A).
Figure 1

The ampullary mass depicted in endoscopy.

Figure 2

(A) Image of the ampulla after ampullectomy, endoscopic sphincterotomy and the placement of a plastic 10 Fr biliary stent. Post ampullectomy endoscopy (B) The papilla after additional excision of remnant tissue in combination with argon plasma coagulation and placement of a partially covered metallic biliary stent, 1 month after the initial intervention. One month later, additional argon plasma coagulation and metallic stent placement.

Histology showed a clear cell carcinoma, consistent with renal origin. Immunochemistry confirmed the diagnosis [vimentin(+), CD10(+), CK8(+), RCCa antigen(+)]. Further evaluation with chest CT and radionuclide bone scanning revealed the presence of lung and bone metastases. The presence of multiple metastatic foci excluded the need for pancreatoduodenectomy and the patient was treated with oral sunitinib. For better palliation, repeat ERCP was performed a month later and additional excision of remnant tissue was performed in combination with argon plasma coagulation (APC) and placement of a partially covered metallic biliary stent (Wallstent; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) (Figure 2B). Six months later the stent was removed and multiple biopsies showed no evidence of residual tumor (Figure 3). The patient was re-evaluated with endoscopy every 6 months. The patient succumbed to metastatic disease 1.5 years later without jaundice or abnormal liver function tests.
Figure 3

Endoscopic image of the papilla 6 months after treatment, depicting good local control of the lesion.

Conclusion

Renal cancer counts approximately for 3.8% of all adult malignancies [1]. The treatment for localized disease is radical nephrectomy, despite the fact that recent data suggest that less extended procedures in selected patients, such as nephron-sparing surgery (partial nephrectomy) as well as laparoscopic procedures, hold the same results in terms of survival rate [26]. Surgical excision is considered curative in 71 to 97% of patients with localized disease (pathologic stage pT1-2), whereas 5-year cancer-specific survival rates after nephrectomy decrease to 20 to 53% for patients with locally advanced tumors and below 15% for patients with metastatic disease [7]. Respectively, the rate of recurrence, even in cases of resection with curative intent, is high, ranging from 20 to 30%. It is estimated that, in total, 50% of the patients with renal carcinoma will present with or eventually develop metastatic disease [8]. Adjuvant therapy consisting of IL-2 and IFN-a, which was considered the standard of care for many years, held very low response rates. Recent advances in our understanding of the biology of renal cell carcinoma led to the development of novel targeted therapies such as mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors as temsirolimus or the inhibitors of the split-kinase-domain family of receptors of tyrosine kinase sunitinib and sorafenib, which prevent tumor angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition (mTOR and VEGF are commonly used and may be explained but not substituted). Response rates are currently under investigation in trials; sunitinib, however, has been established as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [9]. Usual sites of metastatic spread are the liver, the lungs, the brain and the bones, whereas less common sites are the gallbladder and the urinary bladder. Metastases usually occur in the first 3 years after nephrectomy. However, metastatic foci from renal cancer have been reported as late as 25 years after radical nephrectomy which was considered curative [10].

Ampullary metastases from RCC are quite rare. Sporadic reports of isolated metastases in the ampulla of Vater involved lesions which presented with obstructive jaundice [11], malabsorption [12] or obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, with the prevailing mode of spread being the hematogenous route [13]. Diagnosis is usually set by endoscopic biopsy, since cross-sectional imaging may often fail to delineate a lesion. The treatment proposed for isolated lesions is pancreatoduodenectomy, since data demonstrate sufficient median survival (26 months) and an actuarial 5-year survival of 75%. It is important to denote that, out of the tumors that metastasize in the pancreas and the periampullary region, renal cancer yields the most favorable prognosis; therefore surgical excision is advocated in cases of isolated foci [1416]. However, this operative approach is not indicated in the presence of multiple metastatic foci and such patients are treated with systematic chemotherapy. The therapeutic challenge is the presence of subsequent complications due to the presence of an ampullary lesion such as in our case, in which intervention was mandatory for the relief of obstructive jaundice. The efficacy of endoscopic resection for benign lesions of the ampulla has been proven [17, 18] and has been advocated for small tumors in high-risk patients as a low-risk, minimally invasive procedure [19]. Tumor-free margin can be obtained despite the fact that there had been past reports of local recurrence up to 26% when endoscopic snare excision was utilized [20], since techniques such as APC mitigate such concerns [21]. It is clear that limitations to the efficacy of the method, such as the size of the lesion (larger than 50 mm) and the imaging features in the endoscopic ultrasound or intraductal ultrasound [22], do not apply strictly when the procedure is palliative, such as in our case. It is evident that the ideal result would be ampullectomy with clear resection margins, but the aid of fulgurating techniques such as APC may provide equal results. In our patient, local control was achieved until he succumbed. It seems that in the hands of an experienced endoscopist, endoscopic ampullectomy is a safe and effective procedure in order to provide palliation from metastatic foci in patients with disseminated disease, as well as in high-risk patients who are not candidates for pancreatoduodenectomy.

Keypoints for successful outcome are negative resection margins and endoscopic surveillance [23], but primarily clinical suspicion that the presence of painless jaundice in a patient with history of renal cancer and negative CT scanning for pancreatic or other causes of obstruction should alert for prompt investigation for an ampullary metastasis.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the next of kin of the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.

Author's contributions

AV and AP performed endoscopy and reviewed the images. EK collected the data. AK, CS and GPF reviewed literature,drafted and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Abbreviations

APC: 

Argon plasma coagulation

CT: 

Computed tomography

ERCP: 

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

IFN: 

Interferon

IL: 

Interleukin

RCC: 

Renal cell carcinoma.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens
(2)
1st Department of Anesthesiology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens
(3)
Department of Pathology, Aretaieion Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010, 60: 277-300. 10.3322/caac.20073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, Roemer FD, Pingleton ED, Thomson PG, Long SR: Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1991, 146: 278-282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Portis AJ, Yan Y, Landman J, Chen C, Barrett PH, Fentie DD, Ono Y, McDougall EM, Clayman RV: Long-term follow up after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol. 2002, 167: 1257-1262. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65277-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lau WK, Blute ML, Weaver AL, Torres VE, Zincke H: Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000, 75: 1236-1242. 10.4065/75.12.1236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Uzzo RG, Novick AC: Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol. 2001, 166: 6-18. 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66066-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hafez KS, Novick AC, Campbell SC: Patterns of tumor recurrence and guidelines for follow up after nephron sparing surgery for sporadic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 1997, 157: 2067-2070. 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64675-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zisman A, Pantuck AJ, Dorey F, Chao DH, Gitlitz BJ, Moldawer N, Lazarovici D, de Kernion JB, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS: Mathematical model to predict individual survival for patients with renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20: 1368-1374. 10.1200/JCO.20.5.1368.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Janzen NK, Kim HL, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS: Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent disease. Urol Clin North Am. 2003, 30 (4): 843-852. 10.1016/S0094-0143(03)00056-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Najjar YG, Rini BI: Novel agents in renal carcinoma: a reality check. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2012, 4 (4): 183-194. 10.1177/1758834012443725.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Shiono S, Yoshida J, Nishimura M, Nitadori J, Ishii G, Nishiwaki Y, Nagai K: Late pulmonary metastasis of renal cell carcinoma resected 25 years after nephrectomy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004, 34: 46-49. 10.1093/jjco/hyh010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolkier M, Ginesin Y, Moskovitz B, Munichor M, Levin DR: Obstructive jaundice caused by metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 1991, 19 (1): 87-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McKenna JI, Kozarek RA: Metastatic hypernephroma to the ampulla of Vater: an unusual cause of malabsorption diagnosed at endoscopic sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989, 84: 81-83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Janzen RM, Ramj AS, Flint JD, Scudamore CH, Yoshida EM: Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding from an ampullary tumour in a patient with a remote history of renal cell carcinoma: a diagnostic conundrum. Can J Gastroenterol. 1998, 12: 75-78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Le Borgne J, Partensky C, Glemain P, Dupas B, de Kerviller B: Pancreaticoduodenectomy for metastatic ampullary and pancreatic tumors. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000, 47: 540-544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Nakeeb A, Lillemoe KD: Renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the pancreas: results of surgical management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2001, 5: 346-351. 10.1016/S1091-255X(01)80060-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Machado NO, Chopra P: Pancreatic metastasis from renal cell carcinoma managed by Whipple’s resection. A case report and literature review of metastatic pattern, surgical management and outcome. JOP. 2009, 6 (10): 413-418.Google Scholar
  17. Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, Beltsis A, Papaziogas B, Mimidis K, Zavos C, Dimiropoulos S: Safety and long-term follow-up of endoscopic snare excision of ampullary adenomas. Surg Endosc. 2006, 20: 608-613. 10.1007/s00464-004-2278-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Catalano MF, Linder JD, Chak A, Sivak MV, Raijman I, Geenen JE, Howell DA: Endoscopic management of adenoma of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004, 59: 225-232. 10.1016/S0016-5107(03)02366-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoyuela C, Cugat E, Veloso E, Marco C: Treatment options for villous adenoma of the ampulla of Vater. HPB Surg. 2000, 11: 325-330. 10.1155/2000/86476. discussion 330–331PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shemesh E, Nass S, Czerniak A: Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic fulguration in the management of adenoma of the papilla of Vater. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989, 169: 445-448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Patel R, Varadarajulu S, Wilcox CM: Endoscopic ampullectomy: techniques and outcomes. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012, 46: 8-15. 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318233a844.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Boix J, Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Moreno dVV, Domènech E, Gassull MA: Endoscopic resection of ampullary tumors: 12-year review of 21 cases. Surg Endosc. 2009, 23: 45-49. 10.1007/s00464-008-9866-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Bellizzi AM, Kahaleh M, Stelow EB: The assessment of specimens procured by endoscopic ampullectomy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009, 132: 506-513. 10.1309/AJCPUZWJ8WA2IHBG.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Karakatsanis et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.