Open Access

Treatment of a non-typical hepatic pseudolesion complicated by greatly elevated alpha fetoprotein: case report and literature review

World Journal of Surgical Oncology201311:238

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-238

Received: 26 February 2013

Accepted: 11 September 2013

Published: 23 September 2013

Abstract

Background

Hepatic pseudolesions detected by helical computed tomography (CT) are not rare, but it is difficult to make a final diagnosis when the hepatic lesion is complicated by the presence of greatly elevated alpha fetoprotein (AFP). Clinical treatment of non-typical hepatic pseudolesions complicated by greatly elevated AFP should confirm the diagnosis and minimize trauma.

Case presentation

Non-invasive procedures including ultrasonography, CT, and micro-invasive digital subtraction angiography could not safely differentiate this lesion from a malignant focus when it was complicated by greatly elevated AFP. Laparoscopic hepatectomy was performed, and pathological analysis showed chronic hepatitis, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver, and mild vascular malformation. The tissue was HbsAg(−), HbcAg(−), and AFP(+).

Conclusion

Heightened awareness of hepatic pseudolesion complicated by primarily elevated AFP will help physicians avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. Hepatic biopsy is inevitable because of greatly elevated AFP. For suspected hepatic pseudolesion with elevated AFP, needle-core biopsy and follow-up surveillance instead of hepatectomy are recommended to find the source of AFP and make a final diagnosis of pseudolesion.

Keywords

Hepatic pseudolesionAlpha fetoproteinDiagnosis

Background

Hepatic pseudolesions adjacent to the falciform ligament have been observed using computed tomography (CT) [1], but no specific disease has been related to these pseudolesions [2, 3]. When the hepatic lesion is complicated by elevated alpha fetoprotein (AFP), the image findings cannot be used to make a final clinical diagnosis [4]. It is unclear which procedures should be performed in this situation to confirm the diagnosis of hepatic pseudolesion.

Here we present a case of a non-typical hepatic pseudolesion observed on CT that was complicated by chronic hepatitis and elevated AFP. We aimed to identify rational clinical procedures that minimize trauma and that help diagnose a non-typical hepatic pseudolesion complicated by elevated AFP.

Case presentation

A 23-year-old woman presented with elevated AFP during routine physical examination. There was no history of viral hepatitis, drug abuse, or abdominal surgery. Her AFP was 1,127 ng/ml, and she was negative for human chorionic gonadotropin, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis G virus. Her HbsAb was 748 IU/L. Her other biochemical measures were as follows: aspartate amino-transferase, 17 U/L; alanine aminotransferase, 13 U/L; albumin, 46 g/L; globulin, 31 g/L; and total bilirubin, 12.7 μmol/L. Diseases of the reproductive and urinary system that are associated with abnormal AFP levels were excluded. A lesion in the liver was not detected by ultrasonography, but we observed a blunt liver edge and rough echo patterns throughout the liver, suggesting chronic hepatic disease. Incremental helical CT was performed to characterize the hepatic disease. A suspected low-attenuated lesion of irregular shape was found in all phases of helical CT with a 32-row detector in section IV adjacent to the falciform ligament (Figure 1). A malignant diagnosis could not be ruled out by the CT images.
Figure 1

Computed tomography (CT) findings. In each panel, the arrow indicates the pseudolesion. (A) Unenhanced phase CT image. (B) Arterial-dominant phase CT image. (C) Portal-dominant phase CT image. (D) Equilibrium phase CT image.

We discussed the finding with the patient, who agreed to be admitted and undergo digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to rule out obvious vascular malformation or a malignant lesion. The lesion was not obviously enhanced in DSA, and no clear blood supply or arterial-portal fistula was found (Figure 2). After further discussion with the patient (and as she knew magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) might not safely tell the lesion with greatly elevated AFP from a malignant one), she declined to await MRI and demanded a biopsy of the liver and suspected lesion. To avoid possible metastasis and a false-negative result by needle biopsy, she agreed to laparoscopic hepatectomy without Pringle’s hepatic inflow occlusion and intraoperative ultrasonography (Figure 3). A wedge-shaped hepatic specimen, 3 × 5 × 5 cm, was removed and sent for pathological analysis (Figure 4A). Examination of the frozen section showed no malignant cells. The formal postoperative pathology results were as follows (Figure 4B): 1) chronic hepatitis; 2) nodular regenerative hyperplasia and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver; 3) mild vascular malformation; and 4) HbsAg(−), HbcAg(−). Immunohistochemistry was performed, but no difference of AFP expression was found between hepatic lesion (Figure 4C) and normal tissue (Figure 4D). No surgical complications were seen. On postoperative day 7, the patient had Child A liver function and an AFP of 8,377 ng/ml. It was accepted that the elevated AFP resulted from primary chronic hepatitis instead of a malignant hepatic lesion. The patient was transferred to the Department of Internal Medicine with a final diagnosis of hepatic pseudolesion and primary non-viral (B, C, or G) chronic hepatitis. She received protocol including dexamethasone and Compound Glycyrrhizin in the Department of Internal Medicine. After another 2 weeks of steroid and liver protection therapy, the patient was discharged with an AFP of 46 ng/ml and Child A liver function. One month after hepatectomy,no hepatic lesion was found by CT in the postoperative follow-up (Figure 5).
Figure 2

Digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement. The findings were not typical of a pseudolesion from vascular malformation.

Figure 3

Intraoperative findings. Intraoperative ultrasonography. The arrow indicates the location of the pseudolesion.

Figure 4

Pathological findings. (A) An image of the gross hepatic specimen. The arrow indicates the pseudolesion. (B) The pathology sample showed chronic hepatitis and liver regeneration (hematoxylin and eosin staining; magnification × 200). (C) Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) in nodular regenerative hyperplasia tissue (immunohistochemical staining; magnification × 200). (D) AFP in normal tissue (immunohistochemical staining; magnification × 200).

Figure 5

Postoperative computed tomography (CT) findings. In each panel, the arrow indicates the operative site. (A) Unenhanced phase CT image. (B) Arterial-dominant phase CT image. (C) Portal-dominant phase CT image.

Discussion

Hepatic pseudolesion detected by CT that is complicated primarily by elevated AFP is confusing since it is difficult to rule out a malignant lesion using routine non-invasive procedures. However, excessively invasive procedures are associated with increased health risks. Ideally, clinical procedures should confirm the diagnosis while minimizing invasion and cost.

Abnormal AFP with normal liver function and negative viral evidence were the major factors that were confusing in this case. AFP is produced by normal gastrointestinal cells, yolk sac cells, and fetal hepatocytes after birth [5]. AFP levels above 20 ng/mL are considered indicative of possible liver disease [6]. Among liver cirrhosis cases without hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC), AFP is reported to be elevated in 20% and to exceed 100 ng/mL in only 3% [7]. An elevated AFP level has high diagnostic significance for HCC, since the probability of HCC is >90% at an AFP level of >200 ng/mL. However, the AFP level can also be elevated due to other neoplastic or non-neoplastic conditions [8].

Diseases outside the liver that are associated with elevated AFP

Elevated AFP is a typical sign of pregnancy and teratoma [9, 10]. When hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis G virus are negative and liver function is normal, diseases outside the liver associated with elevated AFP, especially malignancies leading to hepatic metastasis, should be excluded first [11]. Some laboratory tests, such as human chorionic gonadotropin, ultrasonography, and radiography, may help exclude misdiagnoses.

Non-invasive and micro-invasive procedures for suspected hepatic pseudolesion

Ultrasonography is the first test that should be performed when a hepatic lesion is suspected. Some hepatic pseudolesions, such as the one caused by rib compression during CT, may be negative in non-invasive transabdominal ultrasound [12]. In the case presented here, the hepatic pseudolesion was missed by non-invasive ultrasound but finally found by intraoperative ultrasonography. Intraoperative ultrasonography is more sensitive than non-invasive ultrasound, but it is limited because it is more invasive [13]. A negative result from non-invasive ultrasonography did not result in a final diagnosis but did suggest the possibility of hepatic pseudolesion.

CT and CT arterial portography images show hepatic pseudolesions as areas of low attenuation with a triangular shape located adjacent to the falciform ligament; these findings may indicate a pseudolesion with focal fatty infiltration [14]. However, only 24.2% of pseudolesion images persist in all phases of CT, and it may be difficult to differentiate pseudolesions from other lesions [1]. In the case we present, the hepatic lesion resulted from hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and mild vascular malformation, and its appearance on CT was as an area of low attenuation that was adjacent to the falciform ligament. This led us to suspect primary pseudolesion.

MRI can be used to detect a pseudolesion [15], and high-quality 3 T MRI has been reported to be helpful in diagnosing a hypervascularpseudolesion [16]. Out-of-phase T1 weighted MRI images show a loss of signal in the pseudolesion that is related to the presence of microscopic fat [17]. However, fat deposition and vascular malformation in MRI could not be safely distinguished from a malignant lesion [18]. Chronic hepatitis and abnormal AFP further complicated the case. Thus, in this case the patient rejected to await MRI. However, the final pathological result in this case showed nodular regenerative hyperplasia and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver that might be found by MRI [19]. Thus, regardless of hepatitis and abnormal AFP, MRI is recommended to search for evidence of hepatic pseudolesion.

DSA is a micro-invasive procedure that is usually utilized to diagnose and treat HCC. Although a false negative for HCC by DSA is a possibility, DSA can differentiate a hepatic pseudolesion caused by vascular malformation from a malignant lesion [20]. Unfortunately, in the case presented here there was focal nodular hyperplasia and only mild vascular malformation; thus, none of the typical signs of vascular malformation were found by DSA.

Although AFP levels might be elevated in patients with chronic liver disease, it seemed difficult to differentiate a benign tumor with abnormal AFP from a malignant hepatic lesion using only laboratory tests and non-invasive or micro-invasive procedures. Here, hepatic biopsy had to be performed since pathological results were needed to make a precise diagnosis.

Hepatic biopsy

In the case reported here, the lesion observed on the CT images was interpreted as a suspected malignant lesion after we performed laboratory tests, non-invasive transabdominal ultrasound, and DSA. Laparoscopic hepatectomy without the Pringle maneuver and hepatic inflow occlusion was performed to avoid a false negative and possible implantation metastasis due to needle-core biopsy [21]. The lesion was small, adjacent to the inferior surface of the liver, and located by intraoperative ultrasonography. Because of these factors, hepatectomy did not carry risks of severe surgical complications such as hemorrhage, biliary fistula, and liver dysfunction. However, the final pathological results revealed that the elevated AFP was caused by primary non-viral (B, C, or G) chronic hepatitis instead of the hepatic lesion. Downregulation of AFP resulted from steroid and liver protection therapy for hepatitis instead of surgery. Needle-core biopsy followed by dynamic follow-up surveillance may be less invasive than hepatectomy and more appropriate for this kind of hepatic lesion. Needle-core biopsy, including percutaneous liver biopsy and transjugular liver biopsy, is mostly used to obtain a pre-operative specimen that is useful for both HCC diagnosis and grading [22]. Percutaneous liver biopsy is appropriate to use for hepatic lesions that can be located by non-invasive ultrasonography, CT, or MRI [23]. For hepatic pseudolesion complicated by primary non-viral (B, C, or G) hepatitis and abnormal AFP, regardless of whether the hepatic lesion can be biopsied, liver biopsy without contraindications is recommended to further characterize the hepatic disease.

Conclusion

Here we present a case of hepatic pseudolesion observed by CT that was complicated by primary non-viral chronic hepatitis (B, C, or G) with elevated AFP. This pseudolesion may have been caused by focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver plus mild vascular malformation. This condition can present as areas with low attenuation at all stages of enhanced CT. It is typically adjacent to the falciform ligament and negative on non-invasive ultrasonography and DSA.

Heightened awareness of hepatic pseudolesion complicated by primary elevated AFP will help physicians avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. Diseases outside the liver that present with elevated AFP should be excluded first. MRI is recommended to provide clues of pseudolesion. Hepatic biopsy and follow-up surveillance rather than hepatectomy are recommended when non-invasive and micro-invasive procedures cannot provide enough evidence for a final diagnosis. More knowledge on primary non-viral (B, C, or G) chronic hepatitis with greatly elevated AFP levels and Child A liver function is in need. Additional procedures that are less invasive are needed to better diagnose and treat hepatic pseudolesion complicated by primary hepatitis with abnormal AFP.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Series Editor of this journal.

Ethical considerations

The patient provided permission to publish this report, and the report was approved by the Ethics Board of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, China.

Abbreviations

AFP: 

Alpha fetoprotein

CT: 

Computed tomography

DSA: 

Digital subtraction angiography

HCC: 

Hepatocellular carcinoma

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the expertise of Dr Juan Luo, who performed the ultrasound scan. We are grateful to the patient who allowed us to share our findings.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of General Surgery, Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University
(2)
Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University
(3)
Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
(4)
Department of Pathology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University
(5)
Department of Internal Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University

References

  1. Koseoglu K, Ozsunar Y, Taskin F, Karaman C: Pseudolesions of left liver lobe during helical CT examinations: prevalence and comparison between unenhanced and biphasic CT findings. Eur J Radiol. 2005, 54: 388-392. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.07.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kakihara D, Yoshimitsu K, Naito S, Masuda K: A large pseudolesion in the left lobe of the liver caused by inferior vena caval obstruction secondary to metastatic retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2000, 24: 253-257. 10.1016/S0895-6111(00)00020-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Masuda K: Pseudolesion in segment IV of the liver with focal fatty deposition caused by the parabiliary venous drainage. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2000, 24: 259-263. 10.1016/S0895-6111(00)00021-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hori M, Murakami T, Kim T, Nakamura H: Diagnosis of hepatic neoplasms using CT arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002, 5: 164-169. 10.1053/tvir.2002.36416.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhou YM, Yang JM, Li B, Sasaki M, Hokotate H, Baba Y: Risk factors for early recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Hepatobiliary Pancreas Dis Int. 2010, 9: 33-37.Google Scholar
  6. Eleftheriou N, Heathcote J, Thomas HC, Sherlock S: Serum alpha-fetoprotein levels in patients with acute and chronic liver disease. Relation to hepatocellular regeneration and development of primary liver cell carcinoma. J ClinPathol. 1977, 30: 704-708.Google Scholar
  7. Snowberger N, Chinnakotla S, Lepe RM, Peattie J, Goldstein R, Klintmalm GB, Davis GL: Alpha fetoprotein, ultrasound, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007, 26: 1187-1194. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03498.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Carlo I, Mannino M, Toro A, Ardiri A, Galia A, Cappello G, Bertino G: Persistent increase in alpha-fetoprotein level in a patient without underlying liver disease who underwent curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. A case report and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2012, 10: 79-10.1186/1477-7819-10-79.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tjalma WA: The value of AFP in congenital cervical teratoma. J Pediatr Surg. 2003, 38: 1846-10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2003.08.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bredaki FE, Wright D, Akolekar R, Cruz G, Nicolaides KH: Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein in normal pregnancy at 11–13 weeks' gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011, 30: 274-279. 10.1159/000330200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartmann JT, Rick O, Oechsle K, Kuczyk M, Gauler T, Schöffski P, Schleicher J, Mayer F, Teichmann R, Kanz L, Bokemeyer C: Role of postchemotherapy surgery in the management of patients with liver metastases from germ cell tumors. Ann Surg. 2005, 242: 260-266. 10.1097/01.sla.0000171303.32006.a2.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Nishie A, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Aibe H, Tajima T, Asayama Y, Matake K, Ishigami K, Nakayama T, Kakihara D, Honda H: The incidence of hepatic pseudolesions caused by focal rib compression as seen on multidetector row CT in patients of different hepatic function. Eur J Radiol. 2006, 57: 108-114. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.08.013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Spitz JD, Lilly MC, Tetik C, Arregui ME: Ultrasound-guided laparoscopic resection of pancreatic islet cell tumors. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000, 10: 168-173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukukura Y, Fujiyoshi F, Inoue H, Sasaki M, Hokotate H, Baba Y, Nakajo M: Focal fatty infiltration in the posterior aspect of hepatic segment IV: relationship to pancreaticoduodenal venous drainage. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000, 95: 3590-3595. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03298.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ito K, Honjo K, Fujita T, Awaya H, Matsumoto T, Matsunaga N: Hepatic parenchymal hyperperfusion abnormalities detected with multisection dynamic MR imaging: appearance and interpretation. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996, 6: 861-867. 10.1002/jmri.1880060604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fruehwald-Pallamar J, Bastati-Huber N, Fakhrai N, Jantsch M, Puchner S, Herneth AM, Ba-Ssalamah A: Confident non-invasive diagnosis of pseudolesions of the liver using diffusion-weighted imaging at 3T MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2012, 81: 1353-1359. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.072.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Macari M, Yeretsian R, Babb J: Assessment of low signal adjacent to the falciform ligament on contrast-enhanced MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2007, 189: 1443-1448. 10.2214/AJR.07.2114.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Semelka RC, Matsuo M, Goshima S, Hoshi H, Moriyama N, Itai Y: Early-enhancing non-neoplastic lesions on gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the liver. Clin Radiol. 2003, 58: 778-786. 10.1016/S0009-9260(03)00217-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grazioli L, Bondioni MP, Haradome H, Motosugi U, Tinti R, Frittoli B, Gambarini S, Donato F, Colagrande S: Hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging in differential diagnosis. Radiology. 2012, 262: 520-529. 10.1148/radiol.11101742.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Iwazawa J, Ohue S, Mitani T, Abe H, Hashimoto N, Hamuro M, Nakamura K: Identifying feeding arteries during TACE of hepatic tumors: comparison of C-arm CT and digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2009, 192: 1057-1063. 10.2214/AJR.08.1285.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Binitie O, Tejiram S, Conway S, Cheong D, Temple HT, Letson GD: Adult soft tissue sarcoma local recurrence after adjuvant treatment without resection of core needle biopsy tract. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013, 471: 891-898. 10.1007/s11999-012-2569-z.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalambokis G, Manousou P, Vibhakorn S, Marelli L, Cholongitas E, Senzolo M, Patch D, Burroughs AK: Transjugular liver biopsy–indications, adequacy, quality of specimens, and complications–a systematic review. J Hepatol. 2007, 47: 284-294. 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.05.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Seeff LB, Everson GT, Morgan TR, Curto TM, Lee WM, Ghany MG, Shiffman ML, Fontana RJ, Di Bisceglie AM, Bonkovsky HL, Dienstag JL, HALT-C Trial Group: Complication rate of percutaneous liver biopsies among persons with advanced chronic liver disease in the HALT-C trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010, 8: 877-883. 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.03.025.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.