Open Access

An unexpected but interesting response to a novel therapy for malignant extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the mesoileum: a case report and review of the literature

World Journal of Surgical Oncology201311:174

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-11-174

Received: 11 January 2013

Accepted: 26 July 2013

Published: 5 August 2013

Abstract

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (eGISTs) of the mesoileum are extremely rare and are usually treated with surgery combined with imatinib therapy.

Case presentation

We present the case of a 43-year-old man who developed a large eGIST in the mesoileum. Abdominal/pelvic computed tomography revealed a large heterogeneous mass with cystic and solid components that measured 20.0 × 12.0 × 8.0 cm. Three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and hydroxycamptothecin; en bloc resection; and three more cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with the same regimen and drugs resulted in five years of disease-free survival without any symptoms.

Conclusions

Although imatinib treatment is usually chosen for eGISTs, resistance to imatinib remains a concern; these patients may receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. In case of the former, further treatment, that is, surgery or adjuvant chemotherapy, depends on tumor response to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, this treatment for eGIST is not only beneficial but also economical for patients compared with imatinib. A novel treatment approach that combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in long-term survival in our patient, thus showing promise as a potential therapy for eGISTs.

Keywords

Extragastrointestinal stromal tumorChemotherapyNeoadjuvant chemotherapyImatinib

Background

Although gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare, they are the most common mesenchymal tumor of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. However, there are a few clinical reports of extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (eGISTs) sharing the morphological, immunological, molecular and genetic traits of GISTs and originating in areas external to the GI tube[1, 2], such as the mesentery, omentum, vagina, inguinal hernia sac, rectovaginal septum, ovary, pleura, scrotum, seminal vesicles and abdominal wall[310]. To the best of our knowledge, cases of eGISTs originating in the mesoileum have been rarely reported. Initial reports have shown the ineffectiveness of conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy for GISTs (<10% response)[1], although some reports have shown moderate effectiveness of en bloc resection with adjuvant imatinib therapy for eGISTs[1113]. However, further evidence from a larger number of cases is required to clarify the effectiveness of this treatment regime. Other reports have demonstrated the development of resistance to imatinib in patients with metastases or recurrent GISTs that were then left untreated, thus increasing the risk of death[14, 15]. Here we present a case of eGIST that showed an unexpected but interesting response to a novel treatment approach that combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in a 43-year-old man.

Case presentation

A 43-year-old man was referred to our institute after computed tomography (CT) performed for lower abdominal pain and postprandial fullness at a local hospital revealed a heterogeneous mass comprising mixed cystic and solid components and measuring 20.0 × 12.0 × 8.0 cm. Lymph node involvement or metastasis was not detected. Abdominal ultrasound confirmed the findings by revealing a heterogeneous mass in the same location. The patient gave no history of bowel habit changes, fever, chills, nausea, trauma, past surgeries or family history of malignancy.

Physical examination revealed slight abdominal distension and tenderness. Palpation revealed a large, nonpulsatile, fixed, moderately tender abdominal mass. The results of tests for examining blood, stool and serum tumor markers (CA-19-9, CA-125 and CEA) were unremarkable, as were chest X-ray and rectal examination findings.

Laparotomy revealed a large, brownish mass adherent to the colon, bladder and abdominal wall. These findings in addition to difficult hemostasis prevented resection of the mass. A biopsy sample obtained during the laparotomy procedure revealed inflammatory granulomas and necrosis. Fine needle aspiration cytology suggested the tumor to be a sarcoma with indeterminate subclassification. On the basis of the above findings, the patient was administered three cycles (every 28 days) of intravenous neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 40 mg/m2 epirubicin, 500 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide and 15 mg hydroxycamptothecin in a day. Subsequent CT revealed the mass to have diminished in size, now measuring 6.5 × 5.0 × 5.0 cm (Figure 1). This enabled en bloc resection of the mass. The gross specimen was a lobulated, grayish-white soft tissue mass measuring 6.5 × 5.0 × 4.5 cm. Histopathological examination revealed atypical spindle cells in a whorled and paliform array. The average mitotic count was 3 mitoses per 50 high power fields (HPFs). Immunohistochemical staining was diffusely and strongly positive for CD117, CD34 and Ki-67 (>10%) (Figure 2); weakly positive for S-100; and negative for desmin and smooth muscle actin (SMA). Three cycles of chemotherapy identical to those administered as neoadjuvant chemotherapy were administered after surgery. The patient exhibited five-year disease-free survival without any symptoms (Figure 3).
Figure 1

CT Imaging after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CT, computed tomography.

Figure 2

Immunohistochemical feature of tumor. A standard H & E assay of tumor cells is observed in (A), tumor cells characteristically express CD117 (B), CD34 (C), and ki67 (D).

Figure 3

CT Imaging in follow-up within fifth year. CT, computed tomography.

Discussion

GISTs originate from the interstitial cells of Cajal or their stem cell precursors and account for approximately 5% of GI tract malignancies[1]. However, a few reports have documented eGISTs with properties similar to those of GISTs and arising from multiple extragastrointestinal sites[110]. Despite the presence of two controversial hypotheses concerning the origin of eGISTs, the diagnostic tests, immunohistochemical staining and large tumor size suggested a primary malignant eGIST of the mesoileum, an extremely rare entity. A majority of GISTs are comprised of a uniform cell type, either spindle-shaped, epitheloid or mixed cell type[16]. Positive immunohistochemical staining for CD117 is a defining feature of GISTs[17] and CD34 has been proposed as a reproducible marker[1, 14]. Some reports, however, showed platelet-derived growth factor receptor-α (PDGFRA) gene mutations in eGISTs negative for CD117, also showed a strong correlation between an increased Ki-67 labeling index and a poor prognosis[18, 19]. In our patient, histopathological examination revealed a tumor comprising atypical spindle cells in a whorled paliform array. Immunohistochemical staining revealed diffuse and strong positivity for CD117, CD34 and Ki-67. According to the findings at the first surgery, as well as pathological findings, the patient was at a high risk of recurrence despite the lower rate of karyokinesis.

The current therapy for GISTs and eGISTs is en bloc resection with adjuvant imatinib mesylate therapy. Extensive lymphadenectomy is not recommended because of the low incidence (<10%) of lymph node metastases. However, 50% of patients develop recurrent disease within two years, even after en bloc resection[20]. Increased cellularity, mitotic rate (>5/50 HPFs) and Ki-67 labeling index (>10%), necrosis, cyst formation and tumor size are parameters for evaluating GISTs, of which the first three are predictors of poor prognosis[21, 22]. A mitotic rate of >2/50 HPFs, increased cellularity, and necrosis, and cyst formation have also been found to indicate aggressive behavior[23]. In our case, an increased mitotic rate (>3/50 HPF) and Ki-67 labeling index (>10%), necrosis, cyst formation and tumor size (>5 cm) all conferred a higher risk for recurrence and a worse prognosis. Initial reports indicated that conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy were ineffective against GISTs (<10% response)[1]. Some reports showed success in cases in which the tumor was managed with en bloc resection combined with adjuvant imatinib therapy. However, resistance to imatinib has been reported in patients with metastases or recurrences[1113]. A few reports have demonstrated the efficacy of sunitinib in patients resistant to imatinib[1113], but further studies are needed for confirmation. No method has been very effective in patients resistant to imatinib[14, 15]. Therapy for eGISTs is similar to that of GISTs. Our patient was initially diagnosed with sarcoma and was administered three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy used for sarcoma, resulting in a positive chemical response. Following en bloc resection, three more cycles of the same chemotherapy were administered (considering first therapeutic efficacy and economic benefits). Under close follow-up, the patient remains free of disease at five years. The possible mechanisms could be considered as follows: 1) antibiotics administered after the first surgery relieved inflammation and decreased tumor volume, probably increased the patient’s appetite and immunological capability of resistance to the tumor according to the first postoperative results; some reports also showed that the antibiotics indirectly exert their beneficial effects by immunomodulation[24]; and 2) the cytotoxic chemotherapy effect on different cell cycles inhibited the formation of tumorous DNA and RNA and killed tumor cells. Yet, the molecular mechanisms responsible for the effects of eGISTs cell functions remain unclear.

Conclusions

There are too few data on eGISTs to make a final conclusion regarding treatment, prognosis and recurrence. Although imatinib treatment is usually chosen for eGISTs, resistance to imatinib remains a concern; these patients may receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. In the case of the former, further treatment (that is, surgery or other treatments) depends on tumor response to the initial chemotherapy. In addition, this treatment for eGIST is not only beneficial but also economical for patients compared with imatinib. A novel treatment approach that combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in long-term survival in our patient, thus showing promise as a potential therapy for eGISTs.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying image.

Abbreviations

CT: 

Computed tomography

eGIST: 

Extragastrointestinal stromal tumor

GIST: 

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor

H & E: 

Hematoxylin and eosin

HPF: 

High power field

SMA: 

Smooth muscle actin.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 81200551 and 81270841).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
(2)
Department of Surgical Oncology, Gansu province cancer hospital
(3)
Pathological Department, Gansu province cancer hospital

References

  1. Pidhorecky I, Cheney RT, Kraybill WG, Gibbs JF: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: current diagnosis, biologic behavior, and management. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000, 7: 705-712. 10.1007/s10434-000-0705-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Weiss SW, Goldnlum JR: Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft Tissue Tumors. 2001, St Louis: Mosby, 225-4Google Scholar
  3. Castillo-Sang M, Mancho S, Tsang AW, Gociman B, Almaroof B, Ahmed MY: A malignant omental extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor on a young man: a case report and review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2008, 6: 50-10.1186/1477-7819-6-50.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Li W, Cui Y, Ren G, Wang J, Wu X: Extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the mesoappendix: CT findings and a review of the literature. World J Surg Oncol. 2012, 10: 211-10.1186/1477-7819-10-211.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gao YN, Jiang GQ, Liu JX, Tang WS, Chen LZ: Preoperational misdiagnosis of extragastrointestinal stromal tumors as ovarian cancer: report of three cases with literature review. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2005, 40: 339-341. [In Chinese]PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang W, Peng Z, Xu L: Extragastrointestinal stromal tumor arising in the rectovaginal septum: report of an unusual case with literature review. Gynecol Oncol. 2009, 113: 399-401. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.02.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mekni A, Chelly I, Azzouz H, Ben Ghorbel I, Bellil S, Haouet S, Kchir N, Zitouna M, Bellil K: Extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the urinary wall bladder: case report and review of the literature. Pathologica. 2008, 100: 173-175.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Alkhatib L, Albtoush O, Bataineh N, Gharaibeh K, Matalka I, Tokuda Y: Extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST) in the abdominal wall: Case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2011, 2: 253-255. 10.1016/j.ijscr.2011.07.009.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Song W, Yang JR, Wang YH, Liang QC: Primary extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the seminal vesicles. Urology. 2012, 79: e36-e37. 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Goyal A, Mansel RE, Goyal S: Gastrointestinal stromal tumour in an inguinal hernial sac: an unusual presentation. Postgrad Med J. 2003, 79: 707-708.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dematteo RP, Heinrich MC, EI-Rifai WM, Demetri G: Clinical management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: before and after STI-571. Hum Pathol. 2002, 23: 466-477.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lai EC, Lau SH, Lau WY: Current management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors–-a comprehensive review. Int J Surg. 2012, 10: 334-340. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.05.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Blanke CD, Van den Abbeele AD, Eisenberg B, Roberts PJ, Heinrich MC, Tuveson DA, Singer S, Janicek M, Fletcher JA, Silverman SG, Silberman SL, Capdeville R, Kiese B, Peng B, Dimitrijevic S, Druker BJ, Corless C, Fletcher CD, Joensuu H: Efficacy and safety of imatinib mesylate in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 472-480. 10.1056/NEJMoa020461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen LL, Trent JC, Wu EF, Fuller GN, Ramdas L, Zhang W, Raymond AK, Prieto VG, Oyedeji CO, Hunt KK, Pollock RE, Feig BW, Hayes KJ, Choi H, Macapinlac HA, Hittelman W, Velasco MA, Patel S, Burgess MA, Benjamin RS, Frazier ML: A missense mutation in KIT kinase domain 1 correlates with imatinib resistance in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Res. 2004, 64: 5913-5919. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0085.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Carter TA, Wodicka LM, Shah NP, Velasco AM, Fabian MA, Treiber DK, Milanov ZV, Atteridge CE, Biggs WH, Edeen PT, Floyd M, Ford JM, Grotzfeld RM, Herrgard S, Insko DE, Mehta SA, Patel HK, Pao W, Sawyers CL, Varmus H, Zarrinkar PP, Lockhart DJ: Inhibition of drug resistant mutants of ABL, KIT, and EGF receptor kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102: 11011-11016. 10.1073/pnas.0504952102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, Miettinen M, O'Leary TJ, Remotti H, Rubin BP, Shmookler B, Sobin LH, Weiss SW: Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Int J Surg Pathol. 2002, 10: 81-89. 10.1177/106689690201000201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dorfman DM, Bui MM, Tubbs RR, Hsi ED, Fitzgibbons PL, Linden MD, Rickert RR, Roche PC, College of American Pathologists Cell Markers Committee: CD117 immunohistochemistry tissue microarray survey for quality assurance and interlaboratory comparison: a College of American Pathologists Cell Markers Committee Study. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006, 130: 779-782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Yamamoto H, Oda Y, Kawaguchi K: c-kit and PDGFRA mutations in extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the soft tissue). Am J Surg Pathol. 2004, 28: 479-488. 10.1097/00000478-200404000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Terada T: Primary extragastrointestinal stromal tumor of the transverse mesocolon without c-kit mutations but with PDGFRA mutations. Med Oncol. 2009, 26: 233-237. 10.1007/s12032-008-9092-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Winer JH, Raut CP: Management of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2011, 104: 915-920. 10.1002/jso.21890.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Miettinen M, Lasota J, Sobin LH: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach in children and young adults: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 44 cases with long-term follow-up and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005, 29: 1373-1381. 10.1097/01.pas.0000172190.79552.8b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Singer S, Rubin BP, Lux ML: Prognostic value of KIT mutation type, mitotic activity, and histologic subtype in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2002, 20: 3898-3905. 10.1200/JCO.2002.03.095.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Reith JD, Goldblum JR, Lyles RH, Weiss SW: Extragastrointestinal (soft tissue) stromal tumors: an analysis of 48 cases with emphasis on histologic predictors of outcome. Mod Pathol. 2000, 13: 577-585. 10.1038/modpathol.3880099.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tauber SC, Nau R: Immunomodulatory properties of antibiotics. Curr Mol Pharmacol. 2008, 1: 68-79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement