Open Access

CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of pulmonary malignancies: Results in 69 cases

Contributed equally
World Journal of Surgical Oncology201210:80

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-10-80

Received: 19 February 2012

Accepted: 7 May 2012

Published: 7 May 2012

Abstract

Background

Microwave ablation (MWA) has attracted a worldwide attention gradually in treating inoperable pulmonary malignancies. However, in the lung tissues treated with MWA recurrence of tumor may still occur and few data in large patient groups till now were reported about the safety or effectiveness of microwave ablation in treating primary lung cancer and metastatic pulmonary malignancies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical curative effect (local control, survival data) MWA and its safety as well.

Methods

From 1 January 2005 to 1 January 2008, retrospective analyses, 69 patients underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous MWA of pulmonary malignancies. All patients were deemed medically inoperable. The correlation of tumor sizes and local progression after ablation was analyzed and the survival rates within 3 years post surgery were compared between non-small-cell lung cancer and pulmonary metastases groups also.

Results

Pneumothorax was the most frequent complication and occurred in 24.64% patients after ablation. Neither needle track implantation was found nor did patient death occur in these patients within 30 days. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 66.7%, 44.9% and 24.6%, respectively. The overall survival rates for NSCLC patients in 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 75.0%, 54.2%, and 29.2%, respectively. The overall survival rates for pulmonary metastatic tumor patients in 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 47.6%, 23.8%, and 14.3%, respectively. The recurrence-free survival rates for NSCLC patients in 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 72.9%, 50.0%, and 27.1%, respectively. The mortality rates for pulmonary metastatic tumor patients in 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 47.6%, 19.0%, and 14.3%, respectively.

Conclusions

Percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy was one safe and effective method and could be beneficial for the improvement of inoperable pulmonary malignancies treatment effect.

Keywords

Percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy Inoperable pulmonary malignancies Survival rates

Background

Surgical operation is the preferred standard treatment for primary lung cancer patients [1, 2]. However many patients were poor surgical candidates owing to insufficient cardiopulmonary function, old age, or other medical co-morbidities as well as those with pulmonary metastasis tumors, a life-threatening event with bad survival rates [3]. In recent years, tumor heating ablation such as radiofrequency ablation under the guidance of image has been proved to be an alternative treatment method for these patients with definite effects [48], and as a new minimally invasive technique, percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT) has attracted a worldwide attention gradually in treating inoperable pulmonary malignancies.

Electromagnetic waves were used in microwave ablation (MWA) to produce tissue heating effects and would result in a much larger zone of active heating when compared with that of radiofrequency ablation, which made PMCT a more precise and more reliable method in treating malignancies in many tissues [911]. However few data in large patients groups till now were reported about the safety or effectiveness of MWA in treating primary lung cancer and metastatic pulmonary malignancies. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical curative effect of MWA and its safety as well.

Methods

Study design and setting

This retrospective study was conducted in a single institution. Malignancies in all patients which included primary or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and metastatic pulmonary malignancies were deemed medically inoperable. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided PMCT of pulmonary malignancies. The first PMCT procedures started in 2005. The endpoints were local efficacy, complications, and overall and disease-free survival.

From 1 January 2005 to 1 January 2008, retrospective analyses, 69 patients (45 males and 24 females; mean age 65 years ± 15 years (standard deviation)) underwent percutaneous MWA. Ninety-three intrapulmonary nodules were treated with PMCT (there were 106 intrapulmonary nodules detected by the CT, with 1.54 nodules for one patient on the average). With the agreement of Hospital Ethics Committee, all patients signed written informed consent before the treatment.

Inclusion criteria for patients receiving MWA of pulmonary malignancies were as follows: (1) age: 18–80 years; (2) having lost the opportunity of surgical resection or cannot endure surgical treatment because of other diseases (severe dysfunctions of heart, lung, liver, kidney, and so on); (3) with stage IIIB (according to UICC international NSCLC staging criteria) NSCLC or pulmonary metastasis tumor, and definite pathological diagnosis; or (4) patient refusing to undergo surgery.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with serious failure of the function of important organs (heart, liver, lung, and kidney); (2) patients with hilum pulmonis lesions and companied by larger cavity; (3) patients with central-type pulmonary malignancies and companied by severe obstructive pneumonia, patients with cancer involving main bronchus; (4) patients with pulmonary malignancies transferred to neck and thoracic vertebra, causing severe destruction of vertebral body and risk of paraplegia; or (5) patients with pulmonary diffuse metastatic lesions.

Image-guided microwave thermal ablation

Ablation in all patients was performed with CT fluoroscopic guidance, with 5-mm collimation and 10–50 mA, to localize the tumor. Interventional radiologists performed lung MWA under the guidance of CT scan. Standard surgical prepping and draping was performed. Local anesthesia included 2% lidocaine both intradermally and deeper to the pleural surface. Patients were under conscious sedation using 0.5-1.0 mg doses of midazolam and 25–50 μg doses of fentanyl. Patients were monitored with continuous pulse oximetry and ECG. Blood pressure was measured every 5 min.

Percutaneous entry route was determined on the basis of tumor size, morphology, location, adjacent structures, and access route. Tumors that were <2 cm in maximal diameter were treated with a single applicator which was placed in the center of the tumor. To make the ablation range completely cover the tumors and 1 cm around them, tumors that were 2 cm or larger were treated with two to three different sites based on tumor size and shape. After the treatment, CT scan was performed again to define the change conditions of tumor and images of 1 cm range around it.

The microwave generator (Viva-Wave Microwave Coagulation System; Valley Lab) was capable of producing up to 60 W of power at a frequency of 915 MHz. A peristaltic pump perfused the outer shaft of the antenna with room-temperature normal saline at a rate of 60 mL/min to prevent thermal injury along the proximal antenna shaft. Ablation times were recorded for all procedures. Procedure success was determined by measuring an intratumoral temperature greater than 60°C or a sustained temperature of 55°C over more than one measurement. The total ablation time were adhered to in all cases, on the condition that the patients were able to tolerate.

Patients were observed for a minimum of 3 h after the procedure, with chest radiography performed at 2 h to assess for pneumothorax. Penicillin was administered prophylactically 3 days after MWA.

Complications and follow-up

Treatment-related complications being counted were only within 30 days after ablation, and were classified in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE) [12]. Minor complications were defined as those resulting in no sequelae or needing nominal treatment or a short hospital stay for observation, which were Grade 1 or 2 adverse events. Major complications were defined as those resulting in readmission to the hospital for treatment, an unplanned increase in the level of care, extended hospitalization, permanent adverse sequelae, which were Grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Any patient death within 30 days of image-guided tumor ablation (grade 5 adverse events) was addressed.

Routine CT scan was performed after 1 month, then every 3 months for 3 years. Contiguously reconstructed sections (1:1 pitch) were obtained through the thorax in a single breath-hold, with 5-mm collimation. Median follow-up was 18 months. All CT scans during follow-up were done on the same CT unit and evaluated by the same group of radiologists. A modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criterion incorporating CT scan was utilized to evaluate initial response to treatment [13]. Local progression was defined as any increase in the size of the measurements found on follow-up CT examinations. Stability or any decrease in size was considered as no local progression. Based on RECIST, quantitative analysis for local development of tumor was divided into: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) [1315].

Statistical analysis

Comparison of continuous data was performed by t test. Statistical analysis was performed by Chi-square test. Overall survival was calculated as the time between and the date of death or last news of the patient with the Kaplan-Meier technique and SPSS software, version 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Median follow-up time was calculated by the inversed Kaplan-Meier technique. Statistical significance was set at a P level of < 0.05.

Results

MWA

There were 26 patients of primary non-small-cell carcinoma pulmonary malignancies, 21 patients of metastatic pulmonary malignancies, and 22 patients of recurrent pulmonary malignancies in total. There were 47 patients with the diameter of 72 tumor nodules which were treated with PMCT less than 3 cm, 12 patients with the diameter of 12 tumor nodules more than 4 cm, and the diameter of the rest 19 tumor nodules was 3–4 cm, 12 patients in total. The average diameter of tumor nodules was about 22.3 ± 1.7 mm (8–55 mm). All patients received 3 years postoperative follow-up. For patient characteristics, see Table 1 (NSCLC) and Table 2 (pulmonary metastasis tumor).
Table 1

Patient characteristics (NSCLC, n= 48)

Variable

Result

Age, years, mean

67 ± 13

Sex, n (%)

  Male 

33 (68.75)

  Female 

15 (31.25)

Pulmonary masses

56

NSCLC, n (%)

  Stagea I 

7 (14.58)

  Stagea II 

10 (20.83)

  Stagea III 

22 (45.84)

  Stagea IV 

9 (18.75)

Previous therapy, n (%)

  No surgerya

26 (54.17)

  Lung resection (recurrent) 

22 (45.83)

Reasons for no surgery, n (%)

  Poor lung function 

22 (45.83)

  Sever cardiac risk 

11 (22.92)

  Poor performance status 

8 (16.67)

  Multiple co-morbidities 

7 (14.58)

Length of hospital stay (days)

  Mean (range) 

4.5 (3–27)

aPatients included without therapy, chemotherapy. or radiotherapy.

NSCLC, non-small-cell carcinoma.

Table 2

Patient characteristics (pulmonary metastasis tumor, n= 21)

Variable

Result

Age, years, mean

62 ± 12

Sex, n (%)

  Male 

12 (57.14)

  Female 

9 (42.86)

pulmonary masses

37

Primary tumor, n (%)

  Breast cancer 

3 (14.28)

  Prostate cancer 

4 (19.05)

  Liver cancer 

7 (33.33)

  Gastrointestinal cancer 

7 (33.33)

Previous therapy, n (%)

  No surgerya

11 (52.38)

  Surgery 

10 (47.62)

Reasons for no surgery, n (%)

  Poor lung function 

12 (57.14)

  Sever cardiac risk 

5 (23.81)

  Poor performance status 

2 (9.52)

  Multiple co-morbidities 

2 (9.52)

Length of hospital stay (days)

  Mean (range) 

4.8 (3–32)

aPatients included without therapy, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy.

Complications

No needle track implantation and no patient deaths were found within 30 days after the operation. There were 17 out of 69 (24.64%) patients with complications following this procedure. Pneumothorax was the most frequent complication and occurred in 13 (18.84%) patients, including mild pneumothorax with no requirement for treatment (n = 8, 11.59%), thoracentesis (n = 4, 5.80%), and one (1.45%) severe pneumothorax received thoracic cavity closed drainage. Of these 13 patients who suffered pneumothorax, 10 patients had emphysema before ablation and two patients were accompanied by a small number of bullae. Other complications included five (7.25%) hemoptysis, two (2.90%) hemothorax, three (4.35%) pneumonitis, two (2.90%) chest pain without treatment, and two (2.90%) fever with temperature lower than 38.5°C (Table 3).
Table 3

Complications in 69 ablation patients

Complication

Rate (%)a

Pneumothorax

13 (18.84)

  Mild 

8 (11.59)

  Moderate to severeb

5 (7.25)

Hemoptysis

5 (7.25)

Hemothorax

2 (2.90)

Pneumonia

3 (4.35)

Pain

2 (2.90)

Fever

2 (2.90)

Postablation syndrome

0

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

0

aThe rate was calculated by dividing the number of ablation sessions in parentheses by the total number of ablation sessions (n = 69).

bChest tube required.

Tumor progression

Fifteen patients (21.74%) appeared with in situ local progress of masses. Among the 69 patients treated by MWA, the diameters of 47 patients were <3 cm, that of 12 patients were 3–4 cm, and that of the remaining 10 were >4 cm. During the MWA treatment for 91 pulmonary malignancies nodules, 178 different parts received MWA treatment in total. There were 2 ± 1 parts ablated for every tumor on the average.

Local progression rate of tumor within 3 years reached 16.13% (n = 15). There was no significant difference for local progression between tumors with diameters <3 cm and 3–4 cm (P = 0.373), but there was statistic difference between them and tumors with diameters >4 cm (P = 0.0396, P = 0.029, respectively) (Table 4).
Table 4

The relationship between sizes of tumor and local progression

Tumor diameter

Patient number

Local control(CR, PR, SD),n(%)

Local progression(PD),n(%)

<3 cm

47

38 (87.33)

9 (12.67)

3-4 cm

12

11 (91.67)

1 (8.33)

>4 cm

10

5 (50.00)

5 (50.00)

<3 cm vs. 3–4 cm, x2 = 0.794, P = 0.373; < 3 cm vs. >4 cm, x2 = 4.236, P = 0.0396; 3–4 cm vs. >4 cm, x2 = 4.774, P = 0.029; CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.

Survival

The Kaplan-Meier median progress-free period for all patients (n = 69) was 22.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.023–28.977 months). The overall survival rates in 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years are 66.7%, 44.9%, and 24.6%, respectively; the overall survival rates for NSCLC patients in 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 75.0%, 54.2%, and 29.2%, respectively; and the overall survival rates for pulmonary metastatic tumor patients in 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 47.6%, 23.8%, and 14.3%, respectively (Figure 1). The median death period for all patients recurrence-free was 24.0 months (95% CI 17.828–30.172 months). The recurrence-free survival rates for NSCLC patients in 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years are 72.9%, 50.0%, and 27.1%, respectively; and the mortality rates for pulmonary metastatic tumor patients in 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years are 47.6%, 19.0%, and 14.3%, respectively (Figure 2). There were no significant differences in either the overall survival rates or the recurrence-free survival rates for NSCLC and pulmonary metastatic tumor patients.
Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier curve of overall survival rates for NSCLC and pulmonary metastasis tumor group treated with MWA. ( P= 0.024).

Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curve of recurrence free survival rates for NSCLC and pulmonary metastasis tumor group treated with MWA. ( P= 0.015).

Discussion

The preferred therapeutic schedule for pulmonary malignancies is surgical treatment, but for those inoperable pulmonary malignancies patients who cannot endure surgical treatment because of various reasons (such as advanced pulmonary malignancies, recurrent pulmonary malignancies, metastatic pulmonary malignancies, and so on), various comprehensive treatment methods had to be carried out to improve the long-term survival rates of such patients [1618]. Tumor heating ablation under the guidance of image has been proved to be one treatment method with definite effects [19, 20], and the method of treating inoperable pulmonary malignancies with percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT) is one of the new minimally invasive technique popular in recent years [21, 22].

MWA uses electromagnetic waves to produce tissue heating effects and would result in a much larger zone of active heating when compared with that of radiofrequency ablation for its greater convection profile in lung and less severe heat sink effects. Furukawa et al. also found that tissues around the electrodes changed immediately after MWA, that is fibrosis and thickening of collagenous fibre [23]. The ablated pulmonary tissues would be replaced by scar fibrous tissues after 6 months.

The clinical safety of MWA has been proved in some clinical studies. Wolf [24] reported that there was no patient death within 30 days after the operation, and the first death appeared 256 days after MWA because of a fatal massive hemoptysis. He et al.[25] treated 16 tumors in 12 patients with MWA therapy under the guidance of ultrasound, and follow-up was carried out for 20 months on the average. In this group, seven patients survived with no severe complications, and five patients died of metastasis. Nevertheless more data, especially in large patient group, were still needed for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of MWA in treating primary pulmonary malignancies and metastatic pulmonary malignancies.

In our group, all patients survived within 30 days, and complications occurred in 17 patients (24.64%). The most common complication after percutaneous PMCT treatment was pneumothorax caused by pulmonary needle biopsy, and the incidence rate of pneumothorax was about 15% to 45% [22, 24, 26, 27]. In our study, the incidence rate of pneumothorax was 18.84%. Of these, 13 patients suffered pneumothorax, 10 patients had emphysema before ablation, and two patients were accompanied by a small number of bullae, so it was suggested that emphysema and bullae may be the risk factors of pneumothorax in PMCT treatment. However for those patients, who had a small amount of pneumothorax, no treatment was needed and the incidence rate of thoracic cavity puncture and closed drainage was 5.80% and 1.45%, respectively. Other common complications after PMCT operation include blood-stained sputum, hemothorax and pulmonitis, and so on. The incidence rate of chest pain within 1–2 h after microwave ablation was 2.90%, all of which were patients with tumors close to the thoracic wall.

The first patient died of massive hemoptysis 207 days after the MWA therapy in our group. The pulmonary malignancies in this patient were located in the periphery of the pulmonary artery, with a diameter of 4 cm, and the patient received 3x MWA on different parts during the operation. A larger cavity was found in the CT scan 3 month after the operation, which may be the primary cause of massive hemoptysis. It was found that the tumor position in almost all patients that appeared as blood-stained sputum after operation was adjacent to bronchia, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary vein, which suggested that it was a risk factor for massive hemoptysis when the tumor was located near the bronchia, pulmonary artery, and pulmonary vein. Therefore appropriate criteria should be set for patients receiving PMCT treatment, and a well-trained and experienced clinician was needed to reduce the complications when performing PMCT.

The clinical efficacy of microwave ablating was the most valuable fact in treating inoperable pulmonary malignancies. In early reports, the local progress rates of pulmonary malignancies after PMCT were confused [24, 28, 29]. The median progress-free period, survival rate in 1 and 2 years and tumor’s local progress in our study suggested that MWA therapy was definitely effective, especially for patients with non-metastatic pulmonary malignancies. For patients with metastatic pulmonary malignancies, the result was unsatisfied, which might be owing to later cancer staging and poor general conditions.

In these 69 patients in our study, local progresses occurred in 15 cases (21.74%), which showed that local progresses of pulmonary malignancies after PMCT treatment was still a mean problem for PMCT. In further study, it was found that a possible reason might be relevant to the tumor size; the larger the tumor was, the higher the recurrent rate was. Wolf et al.[24] reported that for patients with tumor diameter >3 cm, 26% of them had a residual tumor at MWA parts, 22% of them had recurrent tumor. In our group, among 69 cases of ablated masses, all the five cases whose masses were >4 cm in diameter before treatment had local progress after the PMCT, and patients with mass greater than 4 cm in diameter had a significantly higher ratio of local progress compared with masses of other sizes, which suggested that when the tumor mass was >4 cm in diameter it seemed to be a risk factor for the local tumor progress and might be exclusion criteria for microwave treatment.

Conclusion

Ablating pulmonary malignancies with microwave was a safe and effective method, which could obviously be beneficial for the improvement of pulmonary malignancies treatment effect although further observation was still needed for its long-term effect.

Notes

Abbreviations

CR: 

Complete response

CT: 

Computerized tomography

CTCAE: 

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

ECG: 

Electrocardiogram

MWA: 

Microwave ablation

NSCLC: 

Non-small-cell lung cancer

PD: 

and progressive disease

PMCT: 

Percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy

PMT: 

Pulmonary metastasis tumor

PR: 

Partial response

RECIST: 

Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

SD: 

Stable disease

SPSS: 

Statistical Product and Service Solutions.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University
(2)
Department of Interventional Radiology, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University
(3)
Department of Health Statistics & Institute for Health Informatics, The Fourth Military Medical University
(4)
Department of Respiratory, Tangdu Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University

References

  1. Yacoub WN, Meyers BF: Surgical resection in combination with lung volume reduction surgery for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010, 22: 38-43. 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2010.04.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011, 61: 69-90. 10.3322/caac.20107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Park BJ, Louie O, Altorki N: Staging and the surgical management of lung cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000, 38: 545-561. 10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70184-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dittmar Y, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Rauchfuss F, Gotz M, Scheuerlein H, Jandt K, Settmacher U: Resection of liver metastases is beneficial in patients with gastric cancer: report on 15 cases and review of literature. Gastric Cancer. 2012, 15: 131-136. 10.1007/s10120-011-0080-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Steel AW, Postgate AJ, Khorsandi S, Nicholls J, Jiao L, Vlavianos P, Habib N, Westaby D: Endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation appears to be safe in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010, 73: 149-153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Foulner D: Radiofrequency ablation of a spinal osteoid osteoma: low heat-load technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010, 21: 1596-1598. 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.05.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beland MD, Wasser EJ, Mayo-Smith WW, Dupuy DE: Primary non-small cell lung cancer: review of frequency, location, and time of recurrence after radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2009, 254: 301-307.Google Scholar
  8. Wright AS, Sampson LA, Warner TF, Mahvi DM, Lee FT: Radiofrequency versus microwave ablation in a hepatic porcine model. Radiology. 2005, 236: 132-139. 10.1148/radiol.2361031249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Santos RS, Gan J, Ohara CJ, Daly B, Ebright MI, Desimone M, Fernando HC: Microwave ablation of lung tissue: impact of single-lung ventilation on ablation size. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010, 90: 1116-1119. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brace CL: Radiofrequency and microwave ablation of the liver, lung, kidney, and bone: what are the differences?. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2009, 38: 135-143. 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2007.10.001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brace CL, Diaz TA, Hinshaw JL, Lee FT: Tissue contraction caused by radiofrequency and microwave ablation: a laboratory study in liver and lung. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010, 21: 1280-1286. 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.02.038.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. The National Cancer Institute: Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. 2010, , Bethesda, MD, Approved after 1 October 2009Google Scholar
  13. Fernando HC, De Hoyos A, Landreneau RJ, Gilbert S, Gooding WE, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, Belani C, Luketich JD: Radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in marginal surgical candidates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005, 129: 639-644. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.10.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Cardella JF, Charboneau JW, Dodd GD, Dupuy DE, Gervais DA, Gillams AR, Kane RA, Lee FT, Livraghi T, McGahan J, Phillips DA, Rhim H, Silverman SG, Solbiati L, Vogl TJ, Wood BJ, Vedantham S, Sacks D, Society of Interventional Radiology Technology Assessment Committee and the International Working Group on Image-guided Tumor Ablation: Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009, 7 (Suppl): S377-S390.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Therasse P, Eisenhauer EA, Verweij J: RECIST revisited: a review of validation studies on tumour assessment. Eur J Cancer. 2006, 42: 1031-1039. 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.01.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Vogl TJ, Naguib NN, Gruber-Rouh T, Koitka K, Lehnert T, Nour-Eldin NE: Microwave ablation therapy: clinical utility in treatment of pulmonary metastases. Radiology. 2011, 261: 643-651. 10.1148/radiol.11101643.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Eradat J, Abtin F, Gutierrez A, Suh R: Evaluation of treatment response after nonoperative therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer J. 2011, 17: 38-48. 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31820a0948.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. de Baere T, Palussiere J, Auperin A, Hakime A, Abdel-Rehim M, Kind M, Dromain C, Ravaud A, Tebboune N, Boige V, Malka D, Lafont C, Ducreux M: Midterm local efficacy and survival after radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors with minimum follow-up of 1 year: prospective evaluation. Radiology. 2006, 240: 587-596. 10.1148/radiol.2402050807.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dupuy DE, Zagoria RJ, Akerley W, Mayo-Smith WW, Kavanagh PV, Safran H: Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of malignancies in the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000, 174: 57-59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jin GY, Lee JM, Lee YC, Han YM, Lim YS: Primary and secondary lung malignancies treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation: evaluation with follow-up helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004, 183: 1013-1020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Pennathur A, Gilbert S, Luketich JD: Ablative treatments for lung tumors: radiofrequency ablation, stereotactic radiosurgery, and microwave ablation. Thorac Surg Clin. 2007, 17: 261-271. 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2007.03.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Vogl TJ, Naguib NN, Lehnert T, Nour-Eldin NE: Radiofrequency, microwave and laser ablation of pulmonary neoplasms: clinical studies and technical considerations–review article. Eur J Radiol. 2011, 77: 346-357. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Furukawa K, Miura T, Kato Y, Okada S, Tsutsui H, Shimatani H, Kajiwara N, Taira M, Saito M, Kato H: Microwave coagulation therapy in canine peripheral lung tissue. J Surg Res. 2005, 123: 245-250. 10.1016/j.jss.2004.08.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wolf FJ, Grand DJ, Machan JT, Dipetrillo TA, Mayo-Smith WW, Dupuy DE: Microwave ablation of lung malignancies: effectiveness, CT findings, and safety in 50 patients. Radiology. 2008, 247: 871-879. 10.1148/radiol.2473070996.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. He W, Hu XD, Wu DF, Guo L, Zhang LZ, Xiang DY, Ning B: Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of peripheral lung cancer. Clin Imaging. 2006, 30: 234-241. 10.1016/j.clinimag.2005.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Carrafiello G, Mangini M, De Bernardi I, Fontana F, Dionigi G, Cuffari S, Imperatori A, Lagana D, Fugazzola C: Microwave ablation therapy for treating primary and secondary lung tumours: technical note. Radiol Med. 2010, 115: 962-974. 10.1007/s11547-010-0547-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gillams A: Tumour ablation: current role in the kidney, lung and bone. Cancer Imaging. 2009, 9: S68-S70. 10.1102/1470-7330.2009.9028. Spec No APubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Padda S, Kothary N, Donington J, Cannon W, Loo BW, Kee S, Wakelee H: Complications of ablative therapies in lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2008, 9: 122-126. 10.3816/CLC.2008.n.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Wasser EJ, Dupuy DE: Microwave ablation in the treatment of primary lung tumors. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008, 29: 384-394. 10.1055/s-2008-1081281.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement