- Technical innovations
- Open Access
A method of gastric conduit elevation via the posterior mediastinal pathway in thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy
© Hirahara et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 3 August 2011
Accepted: 24 January 2012
Published: 24 January 2012
Despite efforts to improve surgical techniques, serious complications still sometimes occur. Use of a physiological posterior mediastinal pathway has increased given advances such as automated anastomotic devices and a reduction in the incidence of anastomotic sufficiency. Until now the gastric conduit created has been protected by an echo probe cover and, sown to the ventral side of polyester tape placed through the abdomen to the neck, and then blindly elevated to the neck. We report on a new method of gastric conduit elevation.
Two 60-cm lengths polyester tape are ligated at both ends to form a loop. An echo probe cover of 10 cm in diameter and 50 cm in length is prepared and the tip cut off, forming a cylinder. The knots in the previously looped polyester tape are inserted into the echo probe cover. The looped polyester tape and echo probe cover is ligated with silk approximately 5 cm in front of the knots on both sides.
After dissection is carried out according to practice, the previously crafted polyester tape is inserted into the chest cavity. One end of polyester tape is fixed to the distal esophageal stump with the clips, with the opposite end fixed to the proximal esophageal stump. The echo probe cover that connects the proximal esophagus and distal esophagus is monitored for the presence of creases along the long axis to ensure there are no twists in the echo probe cover.
We carry out a laparoscopic-assisted perigastric lymph node dissection, make a small skin incision, and guide part of the thoracic esophagus and stomach outside the body.
Either one of the two lengths of polyester tape is connected to the gastric conduit. By pulling up this length of polyester tape from the neck, the gastric conduit can pass through the echo probe cover and be elevated to the neck.
No perioperative complications such as bleeding or difficulty of the gastric conduit elevation were recognized with this method.
This method is considered to serve as a useful technique for gastric conduit elevation.
Esophageal cancer surgery is invasive and associated with a high incidence of complications. Although improvements have been made in surgical maneuvers and perioperative care, serious complications still occur after esophageal cancer surgery. Recently, thoracoscopic surgery has been gaining popularity as a minimally invasive surgery. As this method of surgery involves only minimal cutting of the intercostals, respiratory function can be retained, which tends to decrease the incidence of pulmonary complications such as pneumonia and atelectasis [1–3]. In addition, the pre-sternal and retro-sternal routes have often been selected for pathway reconstruction in the past due to the possibility of fatal suture failure. Recently, however, the use of a physiological posterior mediastinal pathway has increased due to advances such as automated anastomotic devices and a reduction in the incidence of anastomotic sufficiency [4, 5]. At present, a consensus has not been obtained due to the differences between facilities, including preoperative and postoperative management as well as the surgery itself [6–8]. In our department, the standard surgical procedure has been thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy from a semi-pronated position and laparoscopic gastric surgery, gastric conduit elevation to the neck via the posterior mediastinal pathway, and anastomosis and reconstruction of the cervical esophagus and gastric conduit at each end. Until now, the created gastric conduit has been protected in an echo probe cover and, after completion of thoracoscopic manipulation, sown to the ventral side of the polyester tape, which has been placed through the abdomen to the neck, and blindly elevated to the neck . However, when this elevation method is used, the gastric conduit adheres to the azygos vein and bronchial arteries and poses a risk of major bleeding. In this paper we report on a safe method of gastric conduit elevation that we have used, which can be performed to reduce the risk of bleeding.
The new method was evaluated in a consecutive number of patients. This series was compared to a series using the conventional method.
Modification of polyester tape and echo probe cover
Abdominal and cervical manipulation
Gastric conduit elevation
When the gastric conduit is elevated to the neck, the echo probe cover is disconnected from the neck and the remaining polyester tape was removed. An additional pneumoperitoneum procedure or maneuver to induce the gastric conduit into the esophageal hiatus is unnecessary as the gastric conduit elevation route could be secured with the echo probe cover.
If the gastric conduit could not be elevated to the neck with the first polyester tape, the second polyester tape will be needed to perform the elevation once again and therefore should only be removed after all manipulations are complete.
Clinical characteristics and surgical results of the two groups were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 13.0 statistical software. The comparisons among groups were performed by Student's t test and the chi-square test. P values are reported for a two-tailed test with P < 0.05 considered significant.
Patient demographics and clinical characteristics
(n = 36)
Our new method
(n = 8)
Location of main tumor
Depth of tumor invasion
From September 2009 to February 2011, we needed eight ± two minutes with thirty-six patients to elevate the gastric conduit using the conventional method. But from February 2011 to September 2011, we need only two minutes ± two minutes with eight patients using the new method proposed here.
None of these patients showed tumor infiltration into other structures, and curative resection was performed
Surgical results of a thoracoscopic esophagectomy
(n = 36)
Our new method
(n = 8)
563 ± 57
583 ± 47
289 ± 67
313 ± 41
Gastric conduit elevation
8 ± 2
2 ± 2
153 ± 115
137 ± 37
Post operative hospital stay (days)
30 ± 41
28 ± 36
The stomach is the most commonly used organ in esophageal reconstruction after subtotal esophagectomy. When the stomach is judged unsuitable, the small intestine or colon is used via the anterior or posterior sternal route or the posterior mediastinum route [11, 12]. Each of these organ reconstruction and route reconstruction has its own advantages and disadvantages and differs according to the medical facility. Recently, increasingly more facilities use the posterior mediastinum route because it offers physiological advantages and short reconstruction distance. The gastric conduit is blindly pulled up to the neck, where an anastomosis connects it to the ventral side of the polyester tape that has been placed through the abdomen to the neck via the posterior mediastinal route, after completing thoracoscopic manipulation [8, 9]. However as the gastric conduit is blindly elevated intrathoracically, twists in the gastric tube and damage such as vascular damage to other organs is a risk [13, 14]. In the 35 cases of esophageal cancer that we have operated on until now, we performed thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy in a semipronated position and reconstructed the posterior mediastinal route by using the stomach. However, the 36th case involved a patient who sustained damage to the right bronchial artery during elevation of the gastric conduit and suffered major bleeding. Fortunately, as the bleeding had stopped when the thoracic cavity was thoracoscopically examined again, we clipped each stump of the bronchial artery, and the surgery was completed without any need for blood transfusion. However, after this experience, we thought it was necessary to construct some sort of device to avoid similar problems in the future.
It is safe to elevate the gastric conduit while observing the thoracic cavity thoracoscopically. However, observing the peritoneal cavity and thoracic cavity at the same time is difficult and positioning is an issue. Using the new method we considered, the echo probe cover can be placed in the posterior mediastinal without twists after completion of thoracic maneuvering. The gastric conduit can then be elevated through the intra echo probe cover. This enables the gastric conduit to be elevated safely to cervical field without contacting other organs. Even if there is a twist in the echo probe cover, resistance can be felt during gastric conduit elevation and the gastric conduit can be elevated together with the echo probe cover, so there is no change from the conventional method in which the gastric conduit is covered and protected by the echo probe cover and no increased risk of damage to other organs. The risk of omental and other damage has become a concern when the gastric conduit passes through the echo probe cover, but resistance is decreased by filling the echo probe cover with saline. We have performed the presented procedure in 8 patients, without injury to the greater omentum. If, however, resistance is felt, it is important to change to a method in which the gastric conduit is elevated to the neck together with the echo probe cover. A dual method of protection such as passing the gastric conduit through the echo probe cover after the gastric conduit has been covered and protected as a method to prevent omental damage has been considered for the future, but has not yet been implemented because omental damage has not yet been experienced.
In maneuvers with laparotomy, the esophageal hiatus can be observed under direct vision and a bent gastric conduit does not interfere with the vision. In laparoscopic surgery, pneumoperitoneum was achieved again during gastric conduit elevation and the gastric conduit was carefully transported to the thoracic cavity using forceps with an emphasis on gastric conduit elevation from the neck, while checking the esophageal hiatus [15, 16]. With this manipulation, there were many cases in which the gastric conduit was bent and it was difficult to ensure vision. However, with our method there is no need for pneumoperitoneum to be performed again, and easy elevation is possible by pushing the gastric conduit directly into the echo probe cover by hand though a small epigastric incision. Because many esophageal cancer surgeries take a long time; this causes stress to the operating staff as well as the patient, there is an urgent need to improve surgical procedures and work to reduce their length [17, 18]. We wish to continue further development by first accumulating cases with which to evaluate the usefulness of our method.
The authors thank Eiji Hira, and Yoshihide Shimojo for contributed patients and information on the patients. We are also grateful to Takeshi Matsubara, Ryoji Hyakudomi and Seiji Yano for co-surgeon on the cases. The authors had the generous support and encouragement of Yoshitsugu Tajima for correcting the English used in this manuscript.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
- Lee JM, Cheng JW, Lin MT, Huang PM, Chen JS, Lee YC: Is there any benefit to incorporating a laparoscopic procedure into minimally invasive esophagectomy? The impact on perioperative results in patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 2011, 35: 790-797. 10.1007/s00268-011-0955-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Parker M, Pfluke JM, Shaddix KK, Asbun HJ, Smith CD, Bowers SP: Video: transcervical videoscopic esophageal dissection in minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011, 25: 941-942. 10.1007/s00464-010-1253-1. Epub 2010 Sep 17View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, Musholt TJ, Timm S, Rink A, Tsiamis A, Karaliotas C, Lang H: Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci. 2010, 55: 3031-3040. 10.1007/s10620-010-1153-1. Epub 2010 Feb 26View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gawad KA, Hosch SB, Bumann D, Lübeck M, Moneke LC, Bloechle C, Knoefel WT, Busch C, Küchler T, Izbicki JR: How important is the route of reconstruction after esophagectomy: a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999, 94: 1490-1496. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01131.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakajima M, Kato H, Miyazaki T, Fukuchi M, Manda R, Masuda N, Sohda M, Kamiyama Y, Nakabayashi T, Mochiki E, Kuwano H: Comprehensive investigations of quality of life after esophagectomy with special reference to the route of reconctruction. Hepatogastroenterology. 2007, 54: 104-110.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu H, Ye T, Tan D, Li H, Chen H: Is anterior mediastinum route a shorter choice for esophageal reconstruction? A comparative anatomic study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011,Google Scholar
- Wang H, Tan L, Feng M, Zhang Y, Wang Q: Comparison of the short-term health-related quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer with different routes of gastric tube reconstruction after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Qual Life Res. 2011, 20: 179-189. 10.1007/s11136-010-9742-1. Epub 2010 Sep 21View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhou J, Chen H, Lu JJ, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Hu H, Zhou X, Luo X, Yang F, Tam J: Application of a modified McKeown procedure (thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization three-incision esophagectomy) in esophageal cancer surgery: Initial experience with 30 cases. Dis Esophagus. 2009, 22: 687-693. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00963.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Makuuchi H: Reconstruction after thoracic esophagectomy. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2008, 109: 256-260.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, Koike K, Miyazaki K: Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010, 24: 2695-2973. Epub 2010 May 22View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barzin A, Norton JA, Whyte R, Lee GK: Supercharged jejunum flap for total esophageal reconstruction: single-surgeon 3-year experience and outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011, 127: 173-180. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f95a36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Doki Y, Okada K, Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Fujiwara Y, Takiguchi S, Yasuda T, Hirao T, Nagano H, Monden M: Long-term and short-term evaluation of esophageal reconstruction using the colon or the jejunum in esophageal cancer patients after gastrectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2008, 21: 132-138. 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00738.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirao T, Ko S, Kanehiro H, Kakajima Y, Nakano H, Kikuchi E, Matsumura M, Fukui H, Tsuji T: Radical esophagogastrectomy for unshuntable extrahepatic portal hypertension with bleeding varices: report of a case. Surg Today. 1997, 27: 243-246. 10.1007/BF00941653.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pantvaidya GH, Mistry RC, Ghanekar VR, Upasani VV, Pramesh CS: Injury of an aberrant subclavian artery: rare complication of video assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005, 11: 35-37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Braghetto IM, Burdiles PP, Korn OB: Esophagectomy and laparoscopic gastric mobilization with minilaparotomy for tubulization and esophageal replacement. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001, 11: 119-125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cense HA, Busch OR, Bemelman WA, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ: Results of the combination of open transthoracic esophagectomy with laparoscopic gastric tube formation for esopgageal cancer. Dig Surg. 2006, 23: 164-168. 10.1159/000094350. Epub 2006 Jun 30View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suzuki S, Morimatsu H, Omori E, Shimizu H, Takahashi T, Yamatsuji T, Naomoto Y, Morita K: Response to surgical stress after esophagectomy: Gene expression of heat shock protein 70, toll-like receptor 4, tumor necrosis factor-and inducible nitric oxide synthase. Mol Med Report. 2010, 3: 765-769. doi: 10.3892/mmr. 2010.335. Epub 2010 Jul 20Google Scholar
- Udagawa H, Ueno M, Kinoshita Y: Rationale for video-assisted radical esophagectomy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009, 57: 127-131. 10.1007/s11748-008-0362-4. Epub 2009 Mar 12View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.