Successful treatment with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus in a patient with Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor
© Gennatas et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 25 May 2012
Accepted: 17 August 2012
Published: 3 September 2012
Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) is an extremely rare neoplasm that appears to arise most commonly at visceral (especially gastrointestinal and uterine), retroperitoneal, and abdominopelvic sites. Malignant PEComas exist but are very rare. These tumors represent a family of mesenchymal neoplasms, mechanistically linked through activation of the mTOR signaling pathway. Metastatic PEComa is a rare form of sarcoma for which no effective therapy has been described previously and that has a uniformly fatal outcome. Although there is no known effective therapy, the molecular pathophysiology of aberrant mTOR signaling provides a scientific rationale to target this pathway therapeutically. The difficulty in determining optimal therapy, owing to the sparse literature available, led us to present this case. On this basis, we report a case of metastatic retroperitoneal PEComa treated with an oral mTOR inhibitor, with everolimus achieving significant clinical response.
The major members of this family include lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a disease predominantly presenting as numerous nodular and interstitial pulmonary lesions in premenopausal women; angiomyolipoma, commonly identified as an asymptomatic renal lesion with evidence of vascular, muscular and adipocytic differentiation; and PEComa, an epithelioid malignancy with clear-to-granular eosinophilic cytoplasm typically arising in the gastrointestinal tract, retroperitoneum, uterus or somatic soft tissues, composed of nests and sheets of epithelioid or occasionally spindled cells, intimately related to blood vessel walls[3, 4].
Tumors of the PEComa family are rare and usually occur sporadically. LAM and angiomyolipoma also are seen at high frequency in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), a disorder caused by mutation of TSC1 or TSC2, for which the gene products negatively regulate mTORC1 through inhibition of the mTOR kinase activator, RHEB. Both TSC1 and TSC2 gene products are involved in multiple cellular pathways, including regulation of cell proliferation, migration and differentiation through inhibition of the Rheb/mTOR/p70S6 kinase-signaling pathway. Inactivation of the tuberin/hamartin complex in TSC thus leads to the activation of mTOR and the phosphorylation of p70S6K and ribosomal protein S6, and further promotes translational initiation and cell growth. This mTOR pathway is reported to be inappropriately up regulated not only in TSC-associated AML, but also in sporadic angiomyolipoma or PEComas.
Most PEComas are benign tumors and do not recur after complete surgical resection. However, a subset of PEComas exhibits malignant behavior, with either locally invasive recurrences or development of distant metastases, most commonly in the lung. No effective therapy for malignant PEComa has been described. Recently, Italiano et al. described transient improvement in two patients with malignant PEComa treated with temsirolimus, an inhibitor of mTOR. Additionally, Bissler et al. have reported promising results from the use of the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus on renal angiomyolipoma and on LAM associated with the TSC. Subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA), another TSC associated neoplasm, can also be successfully managed by mTOR inhibition, and everolimus is already an FDA-approved drug for non-resectable SEGAs.
Altogether, these findings support the inhibition of mTOR as a rational therapeutic target in tumors occurring in patients with TSC as well as PEComas. On this basis, we report a case of metastatic retroperitoneal PEComa treated with an oral mTOR inhibitor, everolimus.
A 63-year-old woman underwent resection of a retroperitoneal angiomyolipoma in 2009. A metastatic workup including a thoracic, abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) 1 year later revealed retroperitoneal recurrence, which was completely resected. The surgical specimen was routinely processed for histology. The tumor was composed predominantly of spindle-shaped cells arranged in fascicles. These spindled cells, with eosinophilic cytoplasm, resembled smooth muscle cells.
The comparison with the tumor resected in 2009 described as angiomyolipoma showed the same morphology as the recurrent tumor. Immunohistochemistry showed the neoplastic cells positive for HMB 45, Melan-A, vimentin and CD 117 (focally). The neoplastic cells were negative for SMA, Pan CK, CD 34 and S-100.The pathological characteristics in combination with immunophenotypes are consistent with the diagnosis of PEComa.
A subset of PEComas exhibits malignant behavior, with either locally invasive recurrences or development of distant metastases, most commonly in the lung. A challenge regarding these tumors is their management. Surgery seems to be the only approach for aggressive cases, as chemotherapy and radiotherapy have not shown significant results. However, this is based on few cases as no therapeutic trial has so far been implemented. There are obvious difficulties to performing a therapeutic trial mainly because of the rarity of the disease. Recent studies demonstrated TSC1/2 inactivation and m-TOR hyperactivation in non-TSC AMLs and in extrarenal PEComas using immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis. Based on the fact that PEComas share activation of the mTOR pathway with LAM and angiomyolipoma in many instances, we treated our patient with everolimus, an inhibitor of mTOR. We have observed significant clinical response with a near complete response of greater than 10 months’ duration.
Our data are consistent with findings published to date on the activity of mTOR inhibitors in tumors known to be biologically related to PEComas, specifically angiomyolipoma and LAM. After case reports of patients with renal angiomyolipoma and LAM responding to sirolimus were published, Bissler et al. reported on the treatment of 25 patients with angiomyolipoma or LAM with sirolimus for 12 months followed by 12 months of observation. After 12 months of therapy, the angiomyolipoma volume decreased 53% but returned to 86% of baseline after the year of observation, which indicated the need for continued inhibition to maintain tumor shrinkage. Less impressive improvements in respiratory function were observed in patients with LAM, which also reversed on observation alone. Interestingly, facial angiofibromas associated with tuberous sclerosis also have significantly improved with sirolimus therapy in a case report.
Other evidence to support activation of the mTOR pathway in PEComas has also recently been described. Kenerson et al. reported immunohistochemical evidence of mTORC1 activity in 15 PEComas and absence of AKT phosphorylation in 14 tumors, which suggests the loss of TSC1 or TSC2 as potential mechanisms.
Similarly, Pan et al. described elevated phospho-p70S6K and reduced phospho-AKT in 11 of 12 PEComas. Seven of these tumors had loss of heterozygosity of the TSC2 region, and one additionally showed loss of heterozygosity of TSC1.
The efficacy of mTOR inhibitors has also been explored in patients with a heterogeneous mix of other metastatic sarcomas, in each case with only a modest response rate. However, the status of mTOR activation of these sarcomas is unknown, although in one study the presence of S6 phosphorylation correlated with a higher likelihood of disease control with an mTOR inhibitor. Taken together, these observations suggest that activation of mTOR through loss of the TSC1/TSC2 repressor complex, or potentially by other means, is likely a common and critically pathogenic event in PEComas.
Inhibition of mTOR has resulted in significant clinical activity in patients with PEComa and merits additional investigation in a prospective study. Absence of immunohistochemical evidence of TSC2 expression or the less specific presence of S6 phosphorylation may be predictive markers for responsiveness to inhibitors of mTORC1. These findings additionally unify the concept of PEComa, AML and LAM as closely related pathologic entities, from histology to genetic changes, to demonstrate the therapeutic benefit of mTOR blockade. Additionally, everolimus, which could be orally administrated, may be more convenient than infused drugs such as temsirolimus for both patients and medical facilities.
Our report indicates that prolonged treatment of malignant PEComas with everolimus may result in durable tumor responses. Because of the very low frequency of these tumors and their aggressive nature, it may be difficult to conduct clinical trials; therefore, as indicated by our case and past reports, mTOR inhibitors may be one of the best treatment options for this malignant disease.
- Agaimy A, Wünsch PH: Perivascular epithelioid cell sarcoma (malignant PEComa) of the ileum. Pathol Res Pract. 2006, 202: 37-41. 10.1016/j.prp.2005.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martignoni G, Pea M, Reghellin D, Gobbo S, Zamboni G, Chilosi M, Bonetti F: Molecular pathology of lymphangioleiomyomatosis and other perivascular epithelioid cell tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010, 134: 33-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Folpe AL, Kwiatkowski DJ: Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms: pathology and pathogenesis. Hum Pathol. 2010, 41: 1-15. 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.05.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zekry N, Rettenmaier MA, Abaid LN, John CR, Micha JP, Brown JV: Goldstein BH: Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms: a systematic review of prognostic factors. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009, 16: 527-532. 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.04.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Armah HB, Parwani AV: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009, 4: 648-654.Google Scholar
- Bleeker JS, Quevedo JF, Folpe AL: “Malignant” perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm: risk stratification and treatment strategies. Sarcoma. 2012, 201 (2): 541626-Google Scholar
- Italiano A, Delcambre C, Hostein I, Cazeau AL, Marty M, Avril A, Coindre JM, Bui B: Treatment with the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus in patients with malignant PEComa. Ann Oncol. 2010, 5: 1135-1137.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bissler JJ, McCormack FX, Young LR, Elwing JM, Chuck G, Leonard JM, Schmithorst VJ, Laor T, Brody AS, Bean J, Salisbury S, Franz DN: Sirolimus for angiomyolipoma in tuberous sclerosis complex or lymphangioleiomyomatosis. N Engl J Med. 2008, 2: 140-151.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beaumont TL, Limbrick DD, Smyth MD: Advances in the management of subependymal giant cell astrocytoma. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012, 7: 963-968.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaufman McNamara E, Curtis AR, Fleischer AB:Successful treatment of angiofibromata of tuberous sclerosis complex with rapamycin. J Dermatolog Treat. 2012, 1: 46-48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kenerson H, Folpe AL, Takayama TK, Yeung RS: Activation of the mTOR pathway in sporadic angiomyolipomas and other perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms. Hum Patho. 2007, 9: 1361-1371.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pan CC, Chung MY, Ng KF, Liu CY, Wang JS, Chai CY, Huang SH, Chen PC, Ho DM: Constant allelic alteration on chromosome 16p (TSC2 gene) in perivascular epithelioid cell tumour (PEComa): genetic evidence for the relationship of PEComa with angiomyolipoma. J Pathol. 2008, 3: 387-393.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.