Skip to main content

Table 7 Multivariate analysis of risk factors for RFS and OS

From: Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a comprehensive contrastive analysis with propensity score matching

Variables

RFS

OS

HR

95% CI

p-value

HR

95% CI

p-value

Tumor sizea (≥ 4 vs. < 4 cm)

1.448

0.788–2.659

0.233

2.230

1.131–4.400

0.021

Histological type (undifferentiated vs. differentiated)

1.026

0.537–1.958

0.939

1.051

0.516–2.140

0.890

Lymph-vascular invasion (yes vs. no)

1.328

0.737–2.392

0.346

1.414

0.751–2.663

0.283

Nerve invasion (yes vs. no)

0.989

0.497–1.971

0.976

0.956

0.459–1.993

0.905

Margin of resection (R1 vs. R0)

1.300

0.554–3.046

0.547

0.928

0.382–2.253

0.869

Clinical response of RECISTb (PD or SD vs. PR or CR)

3.273

0.913–11.730

0.069

3.125

0.810–12.059

0.098

Tumor regression gradec (2 or 3 vs. 1 or 0)

0.795

0.278–2.271

0.668

1.027

0.316–3.325

0.965

ypTNM staged (3 or 4 vs. PCR or 1 or 2)

2.386

0.805–7.068

0.117

2.509

0.787–8.000

0.120

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (no vs. yes)

2.204

0.983–4.941

0.055

2.903

1.261–6.684

0.012

  1. RFS relapse-free survival, OS overall survival, RECIST Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD progressed disease, PCR pathological complete response
  2. aReferred to the long diameter of tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  3. bAccording to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1)
  4. cAccording to the AJCC standard
  5. dAccording to the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Cancer Staging Manual