Table 5 Studies (cases ≥ 50) comparing PD with and without wrapping in the English language literature
Year | Authors | Study design | Study type | Inclusion period | Country | Patients enrolled (n) | Wrapping location | Wrapping material | PPH (wrapping vs. no wrapping) | Conclusion | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2012 | Tani et al. [13] | Retrospective observational survey | Multicentric | 2006–2008 | Japan | 2597 | W 918 | Pancreatic anastomosis or vessels (not specified) | Omentum or falciform ligament | Overall intra-abdominal hemorrhage, 3.2% vs. 3.2% | No difference in intra-abdominal hemorrhage |
nW 1679 | |||||||||||
2012 | Rosso et al. [17] | Retrospective observational | Monocentric | 2009–2009 | France | 61 | W 33 | Pancreatic anastomosis, hepatic artery and celiac trunk | Omentum | Overall PPH, 3.0% vs. 10.7% | No difference in PPH |
nW 28 | |||||||||||
2012 | Choi et al. [18] | Retrospective observational | Monocentric | 2009–2011 | Korea | 68 | W 29 | Pancreaticojejunostomy | Omentum | Overall PPH, 6.9% vs. 7.7% | Reduce the incidence of POPF but not PPH |
nW 39 | |||||||||||
2014 | Xu et al. [19] | Retrospective observational | Monocentric | 2005–2012 | China | 280 | W140 | GDA stump | Teres hepatis ligament | GDA stump-related PPH, 0.7% vs. 6.4% | Reduce the postoperative GDA-related hemorrhage incidence |
nW140 | |||||||||||
2016 | Kapoor et al. [20] | Retrospective observational | Monocentric | 1989–2015 | India | 784 | W 132 | GDA stump and pancreaticojejunostomy | Omentum | Overall PPH, 14% vs. 18% | No difference in overall PPH, less delayed intra-abdominal bleeds in wrapping group |
nW 652 | |||||||||||
2017 | Müssle et al. [12] | Retrospective observational | Monocentric | 2012–2015 | Germany | 196 | W 39 | GDA stump | Falciform ligament | GDA stump-related PPH, 7.7% vs. 9.6% | The incidence of erosion hemorrhage after wrapping is low, but there are still insufficient controlled data to support its general use |
nW 157 | |||||||||||
2021 | Tangtawee et al. [21] | Randomized Clinical Trial | Monocentric | 2017–2019 | Thailand | 68 | W 34 | Pancreaticojejunostomy | Omentum | Overall PPH, 2.9% vs. 2.9% | Neither reduce PPH nor POPF |
nW 34 | |||||||||||
2021 | Meng et al. [22] | Retrospective observational | Monocentric | 2016–2019 | China | 247 | W 119 | GDA stump | Teres hepatis ligament | Overall PPH B/C, 0% vs. 5.5% | Reduce the rate of PPH of Grade B and C |
nW 128 | |||||||||||
2022 | Welsch et al. [23] | Randomized Clinical Trial | Multicentric | 2015–2020 | Germany | 417 | W 207 | GDA stump | Falciform ligament | GDA stump-related PPH, 2.9% vs. 7.1% | Lower the rate of bleeding from the hepatic artery or GDA stump |
nW 210 | |||||||||||
Present study | Zheng et al | Retrospective observational | Multicentric | 2019–2022 | China | 307 | W 165 | GDA stump | Teres hepatis ligament | Overall PPH B/C, 13.4% vs. 6.1%; GDA stump-related PPH, 5.6% vs. 0.6% | Reduce the incidence of GDA stump-related PPH |
nW 142 | |||||||||||