Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of TMJ chondrosarcoma cases in the literature and our series

From: Surgical management and final outcomes of chondrosarcoma of the temporomandibular joint: case series and comprehensive literature review

Study

Year

Age

Sex

Tumor size (cm)

Facial nerve preservationa

Glenoid fossa reconstruction

Histopathologic grade

PORT

Follow up period (month)

Recurrence

(time to recur)

Nortje [22]

1976

40

M

6.0

—

N

I

N

24

N

Looser [23]

1976

26

M

4.0

—

—

—

N

54

Yb (12 months)

Morris [24]

1987

29

F

2.5

Y

—

I

Y

6

N

Murayama [25]

1988

30

M

8.0 × 9.5 × 10.0

—

—

II

Yc

28

N

Wasenko [26]

1990

49

F

4.0 × 2.5

—

—

I

N

—

—

Park [27]

1992

25

M

—

—

—

—

N

11

N

Nitzan [5]

1993

36

F

2.5

N

—

I

N

84

N

Sesenna [7]

1997

60

F

—

—

—

I

N

60

N

Blanchaert [28]

1998

42

M

—

Y

—

II

Y

43

Y (5 months)

Batra [29]

1999

65

M

4.0 × 1.8

Y

—

I

N

7

N

Moustafapour [6]

2000

23

F

6.0 × 6.0

—

—

I

N

—

—

Moustafapour [6]

2000

52

F

6.0 × 4.0 × 3.0

—

—

I

Nd

12

Ye (12 months)

Sasaki [30]

2002

45

F

—

—

—

—

N

72

N

Yun [31]

2008

29

F

1.5 × 1.3 × 1.1

—

—

I

N

—

—

Acar [32]

2008

32

M

2.5 × 3.0

—

—

I

Y

48

N

Acar [32]

2008

40

F

2.5 × 1.0 × 1.0

—

—

I

Y

43

N

Gallego [33]

2009

54

M

2.2 × 1.3 × 0.5

Y

—

I

N

16

N

Oliveira [34]

2009

11

F

2.7 × 1.9

—

—

I

N

72

N

Garzino-Demo [35]

2010

65

F

—

Y

N

I

Y

108

N

Gonzalez-Perez [36]

2011

57

M

—

—

Y

I

N

24

N

Xu [37]

2011

34

F

8.0 × 6.0 × 5.0

—

—

I

N

—

—

Deyhimi [38]

2012

63

F

4.0 × 3.0 × 2.0

—

—

II

N

—

—

Ramos-Murguialday [39]

2012

45

M

5.5 × 2.0

—

N

II

N

36

N

Abu-Serriah [40]

2013

48

M

1.0

—

Y

II

N

6

N

Goutzanis [41]

2013

23

M

6.0

Y

N

I–II

N

24

N

Kumar Reddy [42]

2014

7

M

5.0 × 3.0

—

N

I

N

12

N

Giorgione [43]

2015

56

M

4.6 × 4.0 × 3.9

Y

—

I

Y

—

N

MacIntosh [44]

2015

31

F

3.0

—

Y

I

N

336

Y (123 months)

Nomura [45]

2015

28

M

4.0 × 5.0 × 3.0

—

N

I

N

120

N

Lee [46]

2016

47

F

5.0 × 3.5 × 3.0

N

N

I

Y

47

N

Fukada [47]

2018

78

F

4.0 × 3.6

Y

N

II

N

84

N

Inomata [48]

2020

42

M

4.0 × 3.5 × 3.0

Y

N

I

N

84

N

Le [49]

2020

47

F

2.0 × 2.0

Y

—

I

Y

6

N

Ampu [50]

2021

70

F

3.1 × 3.5 × 2.3

—

N

I

N

15

N

Iro [51]

2021

54

M

2.5 × 3.3 × 4.3

Y

—

I–II

Y

48

N

Iro [51]

2021

61

F

—

—

—

—

Y

12

N

Chia [52]

2021

67

M

4.0 × 2.9 × 2.5

N

—

II–III

Y

18

N

Present author

2023

19

M

4.0 × 3.0 × 3.0

N

N

I

N

196

N

Present author

2023

54

F

3.5 × 3.0 × 2.5

N

N

I

N

134

N

Present author

2023

44

F

3.0 × 2.5 × 1.8

N

N

II

Y

86

N

Present author

2023

62

F

3.8 × 3.0 × 3.0

N

Y

II

N

85

N

Present author

2023

64

F

5.0 × 4.7 × 3.6

N

Y

I

Y

87

N

Present author

2023

16

F

5.1 × 3.9 × 2.8

Y

N

III

Y

66

Nf

Present author

2023

49

F

1.3 × 2.8 × 2.5

Y

Y

II

Y

36

N

Present author

2023

51

F

2.6 × 2.9 × 1.7

Y

Y

I

Y

25

N

Present author

2023

55

M

3.2 × 2.5 × 2.6

N

Y

II

Y

1

N

Present author

2023

64

F

2.3 × 1.4 × 2.5

Y

Y

III

Y

12

N

  1. M male, F female, PORT post-operative radiation therapy, Y yes, N no, — not specified)
  2. aThis pertains to cases in which the continuity of the facial nerve was disrupted irrespective of nerve repair
  3. bThe patient died of massive recurrent disease
  4. cConcurrent chemo-radiation therapy was performed
  5. dPORT recommended due to positive margins but declined by the patient
  6. eThe patient returned one year later with recurrence and underwent RT
  7. fLung metastasis occurred 16 months after the resection surgery. After partial lobectomy, the patient is undergoing periodic follow-up
Back to article page

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us