Table 2 Comparison of resectability evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma diagnosed by CT and 3DVE
CT evaluation | Intraoperative findings | Sensitivity (95%CI) | Specificity (95%CI) | PPV (95%CI) | NPV (95%CI) | Accuracy (95%CI) | Agreement value (κ) | |
Resectable (R0/R1) | Unresectable | |||||||
Resectable | 72 | 7 | 72/86 (83.7, 74.5–90.1) | 18/25 (72.0, 52.4–85.7) | 72/79 (91.1, 82.8–95.6) | 18/32 (56.3, 39.3–71.8) | 90/111 (81.1, 72.8–87.7) | 0.507 |
Unresectable | 14 | 18 | ||||||
Total | 86 | 25 | ||||||
3DVE evaluation | Intraoperative findings | Sensitivity (95%CI) | Specificity (95%CI) | PPV (95%CI) | NPV (95%CI) | Accuracy (95%CI) | Agreement value (κ) | |
Resectable (R0/R1) | Unresectable | |||||||
Resectable | 78 | 2 | 78/86 (90.7, 82.7–95.2) | 23/25 (92.0, 75.0–97.8) | 78/80 (97.5, 91.3–99.3) | 23/31 (74.2, 56.8–86.3) | 101/111 (91.0, 83.6–95.4) | 0.762 |
Unresectable | 8 | 23 | ||||||
Total | 86 | 25 | ||||||