Author | Year | No. of patientsa | SLN IR (%) | Tracers for SLNs | Marked node and/or SLN IR | Matched rate of marked nodes with SLNs (%) | Methods to visualize marked nodes | FNR (%) | Median of SLN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Donker, et al [13] | 2015 | 100 | - | - | 97 | - | 125I seed | 7 for MARI nodes | - |
Caudle, et al [14] | 2016 | 85 | 95.5 | BD + RI OR RI | 94.8 | 77 | 125I seed | 2 for TAD nodes 4.2 for clipped nodes 10.1 for SLN | 2.7 |
Cabioglu, et al [15] | 2018 | 98 | 87.8 | BD + RI (N = 37) BD (N = 61) | 95.6 | 81.4 | Specimen radiographs | 11.4 for all 4.7 for clipped + doubel tracing | 2 |
Simons, et al [20] | 2022 | 212 | 86.4 | BD + RI | 98.2 | 71.3 | 125I seed | 3.5 for RISAS nodes 17.6 for SLN 7 for MARI nodes | / |
This article | 2023 | 38 | 100 | ICG + BD | 100 | 76.3 | carbon nanoparticles | 6.25 for TAD nodes 9.38 for SLN 18.75 for clipped nodes | 5 |