Skip to main content

Table 2 Correlation between factors and cone margin status

From: Are “additional cuts” effective for positive margins in cervical conization? It varies according to the doctor

Variable

Positive margin cone group

Negative margin cone group

p-value

Age (year)*

44.5 (37–52.25)

40 (34–49)

0.007

Pathology result (pre-diagnosis)*

  

0.074

 LSIL

1 (0.6)

23 (2.9)

 

 HSIL and cervical cancer

173 (99.4)

768 (97.1)

 

Pathology result of conization tissue*

  

< 0.001

 NILM and LSIL

7 (4.0)

242 (30.6)

 

 HSIL and cervical cancer

167 (96.0)

549 (69.4)

 

Whether to do additional cuts**

  

< 0.001

 Cut

65 (37.4)

146 (18.5)

 

 Uncut

109 (62.6)

645 (81.5)

 

Cone depth (cm)*

1.50 (1.20–2.00)

1.80 (1.40–2.40)

< 0.001

Cone volume (cm3)*

1.57 (1.17–2.26)

1.88 (1.18–3.01)

0.01

  1. Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%)
  2. LSIL low-grade squamous intraepithelial, HSIL high-grade squamous intraepithelial, NILM negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy, AC additional cut
  3. *p-valve by Mann–Whitney U-test
  4. **p-value by chi-square test