Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate analysis and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression of training set using a stepwise-selection method

From: A prognostic model using FIGO 2018 staging and MRI-derived tumor volume to predict long-term outcomes in patients with uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma who received definitive radiotherapy

Variables

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

Coefficient

(95%CI)

P value

Coefficient

t(95%CI)

P value

Age

0.99 (0.96–1.02)

0.677

  

SCC-Ag (ng/ml)

  ≤ 11.5

Reference

 

Reference

 

  > 11.5

2.59 (1.51–4.44)

0.001

1.91 (1.07–3.42)

0.028

Tumor volume (cm3)

  ≤ 28.8

Reference

 

Reference

 

  > 28.8

3.89 (2.00–7.56)

0.000

2.84 (1.40–5.74)

0.004

Poor differentiation

 No

Reference

 

Reference

 

 Yes

2.33 (1.29–4.18)

0.005

2.81 (1.52–5.19)

 < 0.001

Hemoglobin concentration (g/L)

  ≥ 120

Reference

   

 90 g/L ~ 119

2.10 (1.12–3.94)

0.021

  

  < 90

2.49 (1.10–5.64)

0.029

  

Parametrial invasion

 No

Reference

   

 Parametrial invasion

1.20 (0.36–4.03)

0.764

  

 Pelvic wall extension

2.19 (0.67–7.18)

0.197

  

FIGO2018 stage

 II

Reference

 

Reference

 

 IIIa and IIIb

1.99 (0.79–5.05)

0.146

1.42 (0.55–3.70)

0.469

 IIIc1r

3.80 (1.73–8.34)

0.001

2.45 (1.07–5.60)

0.034

 IIIc2r

6.20 (2.25–17.12)

0.000

4.26 (1.49–12.17)

0.007

Chemotherapy

    

 No

Reference

 

Reference

 

 Yes

0.71 (0.38–1.32)

0.277

0.50 (0.27–0.96)

0.037

Radiotherapy modality

 Conventional radiotherapy

Reference

   

 IMRT

1.26 (0.74–2.16)

0.399

  

Time of radiotherapy(day)

  ≤ 56

Reference

   

  > 56

1.37 (0.76–2.47)

0.289

  

EQD2 dose of point A (Gy)

  ≤ 85

Reference

   

  > 85

1.60 (0.69–3.75)

0.277

  
  1. SCC-Ag squamous cell carcinoma antigen, FIGO International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, IMRT intensity modulated radiation therapy, EQD2 2-Gy equivalent dose