Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic information of included studies

From: Prophylactic drainage versus non-drainage following gastric cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and observational studies

References

Country

Study design

Sample size (no drain: drain)

Study interval

Sex (M/F)

Age, year

Neoadjuvant therapy (%)

Surgical approach

Gastrectomy extent

Combined organ resection

Surgical margin

Lymphadene ctomy

TNM stage

Drainage removal

Drain-related complications (%)

Kim, 2004 [20]

Korea

RCT

170 (84:86)

2001–2001

116/52

NA

NA

NA

STG; TG

Yes

R0

D2/D2 + 

I–IV

Drainage was less than 100 ml

NA

Alvarez Uslar, 2005 [17]

Chile

RCT

60 (32:29)

2000–2003

43/17

61 (range 36–79)

NA

NA

TG

Yes

Any R

D2

NA

Usually 8 days after surgery

NA

Kumar, 2007 [30]

Nepal

Observational

108 (52:56)

2001–2005

69/39

55.6 ± 15.7

NA

NA

STG

No

Any R

D1/D2

I–IV

Drainage was clear and less than 50 ml

7.1

Jiang, 2008 [19]

China

RCT

100 (51:49)

2005–2006

59/41

NA

0

NA

DG; PG; TG

No

R0

D2

I–III

Drainage was clear and less than 100 ml

2.0

Li, 2008 [32]

China

Observational

67 (35:32)

2003–2007

53/14

62.0 ± 11.0

NA

NA

DG

NA

R0

D1/D2

NA

NA

9.4

Zhang, 2009 [37]

China

Observational

311 (66:245)

2007–2008

233/78

58.9 ± 11.8

NA

NA

DG; PG; TG

NA

R0

D1/D2

I–IV

8.3 ± 2.2 day

NA

Zhang, 2010 [23]

China

RCT

67 (35:32)

NA

53/14

61.6 ± 11.1

NA

NA

DG

NA

R0

D1/D2

NA

NA

9.4

Chen, 2011 [18]

China

RCT

130 (65:65)

2009–2011

43/22

62.1 ± 3.2

NA

NA

NA

NA

R0

NA

NA

NA

NA

Fu, 2011 [27]

China

Observational

117 (13:104)

2009–2010

86/31

57.8 ± 10.9

0

NA

DG; PG

NA

R0

D1/D2

I–III

NA

NA

Ishikawa, 2011 [29]

Japan

Observational

21 (11:10)

2004–2008

15/6

NA

NA

Laparoscopic

DG

No

NA

D1 + a

NA

Usually 4 or 5 days after surgery

NA

Song, 2011 [22]

China

RCT

148 (74:74)

2006–2009

117/31

 < 75

0

NA

DG; PG; TG

NA

R0

D2

I–IV

NA

NA

Cai, 2013 [25]

China

Observational

250 (40:210)

2005–2011

155/95

58.9 ± 11.8

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Dann, 2015 [26]

USA

Observational

344 (91:253)

2000–2012

200/144

65 (range 24–92)

30.0

Open/laparoscopic

TG

Yes

R0/1

D0–D3

I–III

NA

NA

Hirahara, 2015 [28]

Japan

Observational

78 (33:45)

2011–2014

51/27

NA

NA

Laparoscopic

DG

NA

R0

D1 + /D2

I–III

NA

NA

Lee, 2015 [31]

Korea

Observational

1989 (740:1249)

2012–2013

1266/723

NA

0

Open/laparoscopic/robotic

STG; TG

Yes

R0

D1 + /D2

I–III

NA

NA

Schots, 2018 [35]

Netherlands

Observational

107 (40:67)

2013–2017

62/45

NA

66.4

Open/laparoscopic

DG; TG

No

R0

D2

NA

Drainage was clear and less than 150 ml

1.5

Akira, 2019 [24]

Japan

Observational

94 (65:29)

2007–2014

62/32

70

NA

Laparoscopic

TG

NA

NA

D1/D1 + /D2

I–III

Drainage was less than 100 ml

NA

Shimoike, 2019 [36]

Japan

Observational

290 (145:145)

2011–2017

199/91

NA

6.2

Laparoscopic

DG; TG

Yes

any R

D1 + or less/D2

NA

NA

NA

Lim,2020 [33]

Korea

Observational

499 (111:388)

2010–2017

353/146

62.2 ± 12.0

NA

Open/laparoscopic

TG

Yes

NA

D1 + /D2

I–IV

Usually 4 or 5 days after surgery

NA

Liu, 2021 [34]

China

Observational

84 (42:42)

2018–2019

60/24

NA

7.0

Laparoscopic

DG

NA

NA

NA

I–III

NA

NA

Muduly, 2022 [21]

India

RCT

108 (54:54)

NA

77/31

56.4 ± 11.3

32.4

NA

DG; PG; STG; TG

NA

R0

D2

I–IV

Drainage was clear and less than 200 ml

NA

  1. M Male, F Female, RCT Randomized controlled trial, MIS Minimally invasive surgery, TG Total gastrectomy, STG Subtotal gastrectomy, PG Proximal gastrectomy, DG Distal gastrectomy, NA Not available