Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of prostheses measurements between the loosening group and control group

From: Aseptic loosening of tumor prostheses in distal femur after revision surgery: a retrospective study

 

Loosening group

Control group

T/Z

P

Osteotomy ratio [%, (\(\overline{x }\) ± S)]

46.06 ± 0.11

44.24 ± 28.08

0.307

0.762

The length ratio of the extramedullary and intramedullary parts of the femoral prostheses [%, (\(\overline{x }\) ± S)]

96.27 ± 28.08

108.51 ± 74.38

 − 0.469

0.644

The ratio of prostheses length to femur length [%, (\(\overline{x }\) ± S)]

71.89 ± 6.62

80.75 ± 8.39

 − 2.672

0.014

The ratio of intramedullary stem diameter to femoral diameter [%, (\(\overline{x }\) ± S)]

25.50 ± 6.90

35.06 ± 12.18

 − 2.457

0.014

Growth ratio of intramedullary stem lengtha [%, (\(\overline{x }\) ± S)]

3.61 ± 7.23b

10.45 ± 21.23b

 − 0.615

0.551

Growth ratio of intramedullary stem diameter [%, (\(\overline{x }\) ± S)]

3.95 ± 4.59b

28.78 ± 26.71b

 − 1.804

0.099

  1. aGrowth ratio = (length of prostheses after revision — length of prostheses after initial replacement)/length of prostheses after initial replacement
  2. bThe original prostheses were reimplanted in 4 patients, so the growth rate was 0, which increased the dispersion of the data, but it conformed to the normal distribution