Skip to main content

Table 2 Meta-analysis results of overall survival and hazard rates in further analysis

From: Survival benefits of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with clinically suspected para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis and systematic review

    

Heterogeneity

Pooled value

Studies

OR

HR

95% CI

P value

I2

Compare positive para-aortic lymph node group with negative group

 3-year OS

5

0.30

 

0.11–0.82

0.002

76%

 5-year OS

4

0.19

 

0.11–0.31

0.31

16%

Compare complete resection group with not complete resection group

 3-year OS

5

5.26

 

2.02–13.69

0.14

42%

OS

 Histological differentiation (poor vs medium-high)

  HR

4

 

2.98

1.48–5.99

0.08

56%

 Postoperative chemotherapy (yes vs no)

  HR

4

 

1.01

0.54–1.84

0.23

30%

 Age (old vs young)

  HR

4

 

1.00

0.98–1.02

0.51

0

 The number of PALN metastases(≥4 vs <4)

  HR

3

 

1.88

0.97–3.62

0.20

39%

 Primary tumor location (colon vs rectum)

  HR

3

 

0.93

0.54–1.59

0.42

0

 CEA (ng/ml)(<10 vs ≥10)

  HR

3

 

0.88

0.41–1.86

0.03

72%

 T grade (T4+3 vs T1-2)

  HR

3

 

1.35

0.74–2.46

0.46

0

Disease-free survival

 Preoperative extra-retroperitoneal metastases (yes vs no)

  HR

4

 

1.85

1.10–3.10

0.75

0

 Primary tumor location (colon vs rectum)

  HR

3

 

1.29

0.74–2.25

0.41

0

  1. OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, OS overall survival, HR hazard ratio