Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup analysis of EBL

From: Short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Variables

Number of studies

Heterogeneity

Model

MD

95% CI

P

Psub

I2

Lower

Upper

Countries

       

0.0007

 China

7

91%

RE

−39.05

−60.33

−17.77

0.0003

 

 Japan

3

0%

FE

−130.65

−157.30

−104.00

<0.00001

 

 ROK

4

86%

RE

−80.13

−126.45

−33.80

0.0007

 

 Western countries

1

-

RE

−75.90

−157.81

6.01

0.07

 

Type of gastrectomy

       

0.15

 Distal gastrectomy

8

95%

RE

−75.38

−117.76

−33.00

0.0005

 

 Total gastrectomy

1

-

RE

−29.30

−58.20

−0.40

0.05

 

 aUndifferentiated

6

81%

RE

−58.10

−80.60

−35.61

<0.00001

 

Stages

       

0.010

 EGC or stage I

8

90%

RE

−81.76

−115.00

−48.52

<0.00001

 

 AGC

4

95%

RE

−59.62

−109.49

−9.74

0.02

 

 bMixture

3

0%

FE

−27.79

−42.53

−13.05

0.0002

 
  1. ROK Republic of Korea, EGC early gastric cancer, AGC advanced gastric cancer, PsubP-value of subgroup
  2. aUndifferentiated: there was undifferentiated of type of gastrectomy in original articles
  3. bMixture: EGC or stage I gastric cancer plus AGC