Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of the study characteristic

From: Efficacy and safety of triplet chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR agents in metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author/year

Country/period of study

Trial name

Study design

Total patients

Gender(M/F)

Median age (years, range)

Primary location

RAS wt/mt/unknown

BRAF

wt/mt/unknown

Primary endpoint

ORR (%)

mPFS (month)

mOS (month)

CLM/R0RR in CLM

mfollow-up (month, range)

MINORS

C Garufi [14]*/2010

Italy/2006–2008

POCHER

Pros-, case series

43

27/16

61 (33–75)

34/9a

30/7/6d

NA

ORR

79.1%

14

37

43/60%

22 (1–43)

16

Sougklakos I [16]/2011

Greece/2007–2010

-

Pros-, case series

30

16/14

64

NA

30/0d

NA

ORR

70%

11e

NR

16/57%

15.1 (NA)

14

ERIC ASSENAT [17]/2011

France/2006–2008

ERBIRINOX

Pros-, case series

42

22/20

60 (32–76)

30/12a

24/16/2d

NA

CRR

80.90%

9.5

24.7

15/NA

18.1 (0.4–39.6)

16

Z Saridaki [18]/2012

Greece/2007–2010

-

Pros-, case series

30

14/16

64 (36–70)

22/8a

NA

NA

ORR

70%

10.2e

30.3

16/62%

31 (13–37)

16

Folprecht, G [19]/2013

Germany/2014–2018

CELIM2

Pros-, cohort

28

NA

NA

NA

28/0/0d

28/0/0

ORR

86%

15

55

NA

NA

22

Fornaro, L [20]/2013

Italy/2010–2011

TRIP

Pros-, case series

37

21/16

63 (33–72)

26/11a

37/0/0d

37/0/0

ORR

89%

11.3

NR

12/75%

17.7 (NA)

16

Bendell, J. C [21]*/2016

USA/NA

-

Pros-, case series

15

13/2

55 (39–70)

NA

8/0/7d

NA

ORR

60%

13.3

NR

15/67%

15 (NA)

16

PietrantonioF [22]/2017

Italy/NA

-

Pros-, case series

31

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

ORR

87%

17.8

62.5

31/84%

48 (NA)

14

Cremolini, C [23]/2018

Italy/2011–2015

MACBETH

Pros-, multi-center, cohort

116

82/34

59.5 (53–67)

95/21b

116/0/0

116/0/0

10m PFR

71.60%

10.1

33.2

52/51.9%

44 (30.5–52.1)

24

D Modest [24]/2019

Germany/NA

VOLFI

RCT, multi-center

63

41/22

58 (31–76)

53/10b

63/0/0

43/7/13

ORR

87.3%

9.7

35.7

NA

44.2 (NA)

14

Ogata, T [25]./2019

Japan/2014–2017

-

Retro-, cohort

17

NA

60

14/3b

17/0/0

NA

ORR

100%

13.1

NR

NA

18.4 (NA)

21

E Samalin [26]*/2019

NA

ESTER

Retro-, case series, multi-center

70

43/27

58.7 (40.4–74)

57/13b

70/0/0

NA

PFS

85.70%

13.3

48.5

68/79.5%

49.2 (1.2–135)

13

Deng, Y [27].*/2020

China/2014–2019

FOCULM

Pros-, case series, multi-center

67

58/9

52 (28–70)

66/1b

67/0/0

67/0/0

Rate of NED

95.50%

15.5

NR

67/46.3%

22.6 (NA)

16

Akihito Tsuji [28]/2021

Japan/2015–2019

DEEPER

RCT

173

NA

65

NA

173/0/0

NA

mDpR

69.10%

12.7

37.6

NA

NA

22

  1. *All included patients were diagnosed as liver-limited colorectal cancer; acolon/rectum, bleft/right, c14 patients with cetuximab, 3 patients with panitumumab; donly KRAS; etime to progression, TTP; wt, wild-type, mt, mutant-type, ORR objective response rate, mPFS median progression-free survival, mOS median overall survival, CLM colorectal liver-limited metastases, R0RR R0 resection rate, mfollow-up median follow-up, MINORS methodological index for non-randomized studies, pros- prospective study, retro- retrospective study, NA not available, NR not reached, CRR complete response rate, mDpR median depth of response