Skip to main content

Table 1 The clinical and histopathological features of 23 cases

From: SP70 is a potential biomarker to identify gastric fundic gland neoplasms

Case sex

Age (years)

Group #

Ki67

SP70

Macroscopic type

Location

Size (mm)

Treatment

Pigment (/HPF)

Mitosis

Cellular atypia

Invasion depth

Vascular invasion

Ulcer

Follow up

1. M

38

A

1%

+

Protruding

Fundus

6

Biopsy+polypectomy

Absent

0

Mild

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

2. F

57

A

2%

+

Protruding

Corpus

6

Polypectomy

Absent

0

Mild

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

3. F

54

A

5%

Protruding

Corpus

6

Polypectomy

Absent

0

Mild

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

4. F

59

unclassified

5%

Superficial elevated

Corpus

7

Surgery

Absent

1

Moderate

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

5. F

80

A

2%

Protruding

Fundus

6

Polypectomy

Absent

0

Mild

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

6. M

64

A

5%

Protruding

Corpus

5

Biopsy+ESD

Absent

0

Mild

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

7. F

67

A

5%

Protruding

Corpus

5

EMR

Absent

0

Mild

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

8. M

71

A

2%

Superficial elevated

Corpus

15

ESD

Absent

0

Mild

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

9. M

68

A

5%

Superficial flat

Corpus

5

ESD

Absent

0

Mild

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

10. M

51

unclassified

5%

Superficial elevated

Fundus

15

Proximal gastrectomy

Absent

1

Moderate

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

11. F

66

A

2%

Protruding

Corpus

6

Biopsy

Absent

0

Mild

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

12. M

73

A

5%

+

Protruding

Corpus

10

ESD

Absent

0

Mild

Mu

Absent

Absent

NED

13. M

60

B

10%

+

Protruding

Corpus

10

ESD

Absent

0

Mild

SM1(110μm)

Absent

Absent

NED

14. M

37

C

1%

Superficial flat

Corpus

8

ESD

Absent

1

Mild to moderate

SM1(363μm)

Present

Absent

NED

15. M

71

C

8%

+

Protruding

Fundus

20

EMR

Absent

2

Moderate

SM1(134μm)

Absent

Absent

NED

16. F

54

B

5%

+

Submucosal tumor

Fundus

5

Proximal gastrectomy

Absent

0

Mild

SM1(235μm)

Absent

Absent

NED

17. M

56

C

60%

Submucosal tumor

Fundus

15

ESD+total gastrectomy

Present

1

Marked

SM2(597μm)

Absent

Absent

NED

18. M

63

B

10%

Protruding

Fundus

5

ESD

Absent

0

Mild

SM1(100μm)

Absent

Absent

NED

19. M

45

B

10%

Superficial elevated

Fundus

6

ESD

Absent

0

Mild

SM1(159μm)

Absent

Absent

NED

20. M

55

B

2%

Superficial elevated

Corpus

15

ESD

Present

0

Mild

SM1(150μm)

Absent

Absent

NED

21. F

74

B

2%

Superficial elevated

Corpus

6

ESD

Absent

0

Mild

SM1(100μm)

Absent

Absent

NED

22. F

60

B

2%

Superficial elevated

Fundus

8

ESD

Absent

0

Mild to moderate

SM2(1500μm)

Absent

Absent

NED

23. M

71

C

15%

Infiltrative ulcerative

Corpus

20

Biopsy+total gastrectomy

Absent

4

Marked

Subserosa

Present

Present

12*

  1. M male, F female, Mu mucosal, SM submocosal, ESD endoscopic submucosal dissection, EMR endoscopic mucosal resection, HPF per high-power field, NED no evidence of disease. *Lost to follow-up after 12 months. #Grouped by Tetsuo Ushiku’s research mentioned in reference [5]. Group A: intramucosal tumor with typical histologic features; Group B: submucosal invasive tumor with typical histologic features; Group C: submucosal invasive tumor with atypical histologic features