Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of surgical safety and radicalization

From: Clinical efficacy of different approaches for laparoscopic intersphincteric resection of low rectal cancer: a comparison study

 

TPAISR

n = 57 (%)

TAISR

n = 142 (%)

PAISR

n = 36 (%)

P value

Postoperative complications

17 (29.8)

38 (26.8)

4 (11.1)

0.100

Anastomotic leakage

1 (1.8)

4 (2.8)

1 (2.8)

1.000e

Intestinal obstruction

3 (5.3)

3 (2.1)

0 (0.0)

0.341e

Anastomotic stenosis

1 (1.8)

1 (0.7)

0 (0.0)

0.636e

Incision infection

0 (0.0)

1 (0.7)

0 (0.0)

1.000e

Others

12 (21.1)

29 (24.4)

3 (8.3)

0.227

Clavien-Dindo Complication grade

 Grade I

9 (15.8%)

13 (9.2%)

3 (8.3%)

0.413

 Grade II

8 (14.0%)

12 (8.5%)

1 (2.8%)

0.192

 Grade III

  III-a

0

1 (0.7)

0

1.000 e

  III-b-IV

0

0

0

NA

Positive distal margin

1 (1.8)

2 (1.4)

1 (2.8)

0.785e

CRMI

2 (3.5)

2 (1.4)

0 (0.0)

0.352e

Distal cutting margin (cm)

1.5 (1.5, 1.9)

1.5 (1.5, 2.5)

1.5 (1.0–1.5)

0.065

Lymph nodes harvested, median (IQR)

16 (11, 20)

15 (12, 20)

16 (12, 20)

0.829

Histological differentiation

0.042e

 Well

0 (0.0)

1 (0.7)

3 (8.3)

 

 Moderate

57 (100)

139 (97.9)

33 (91.7)

 

 Poor

0 (0.0)

2 (1.4)

0 (0.0)

 

pT category

0.140

 T0

9 (15.8)

25 (17.6)

8 (22.5)

 

 T1

9 (15.8)

17 (12.0)

1 (2.8)

 

 T2

22 (38.6)

53 (37.3)

21 (58.3)

 

 T3

17 (29.8)

47 (33.1)

6 (16.7)

 

pN category

0.502e

 N0

42 (73.7)

99 (69.7)

37 (75.0)

 

 N1

12 (21.1)

38 (26.8)

6 (16.7)

 

 N2

3 (5.3)

5 (3.5)

3 (8.3)

 

pTNM stagea

0.054e

 0

8 (14)

20 (14.1)

8 (22.2)

 

 I

23 (40.4)

54 (38.0)

18 (52.8)

 

 II

11 (19.3)

25 (17.6)

0 (0.0)

 

 III

15 (26.3)

43 (30.3)

9 (25.0)

 

Hospitalization, days

8.0 (7.0, 9.0)

9.0 (8.0, 9.0)

8.0 (7.0, 8.0)

0.066

  1. Data are reported as the median and percentile (25th–75th) or n (%); e Fisher’s exact test
  2. CRMI circumferential resection margin involvement, IQR interquartile range
  3. aUICC classification