Skip to main content

Table 1 Patients’ characteristics

From: Prognostic factors for elderly gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy

Age, years

 Median (range)

83 (80–96)

Sex, n (%)

 Male

113 (68)

ECOG-PS score, n (%)

 0

81 (49)

 1

47 (28)

 2

28 (17)

 3

10 (6)

ASA-PS, n (%)

 1

7 (4)

 2

112 (67)

 3

45 (27)

 4

2 (1)

PNI

 Median (range)

44.5 (19.1–63.0)

POSSUM physiological score

 Median (range)

28 (20–46)

Approach, n (%)

 Open

120 (72)

 Laparoscopic

46 (28)

Extent of gastrectomy, n (%)

 Distal

104 (63)

 Total

32 (19)

 Proximal

11 (7)

 Local

13 (8)

 Completion

5 (3)

 Subtotal of remnant

1 (1)

Extent of lymphadenectomy, n (%)

 D2+

1 (1)

 D2

38 (23)

 D1+

73 (44)

 D1

37 (22)

 D0

17 (10)

Histological classification, n (%)

 tub

93 (56)

 pap

10 (6)

 por

45 (27)

 sig

5 (3)

 muc

7 (4)

 other

6 (4)

pStage, n (%)

 IA

59 (36)

 IB

12 (7)

 IIA

30 (18)

 IIB

19 (11)

 IIIA

18 (11)

 IIIB

13 (8)

 IIIC

2 (1)

 IV

13 (8)

Residual tumor, n (%)

 R0

151 (91)

 R1

15 (9)

Postoperative chemotherapy, n (%)

 No

156 (94)

 Yes

10 (6)

  1. Pathological findings are provided according the Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. ECOG-PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, ASA-PS American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, PNI Onodera's prognostic nutritional index, POSSUM Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity