Skip to main content

Table 2 Analysis of predictive factors of regional and/or distant RD (RDRD). Fisher’s exact test and univariate logistic regression. Patients with unknown data had no significant differences regarding the risk of RDRD, compared to patients in the reference categories. This rules out bias due to missing values

From: Prognostic value and risk stratification of residual disease in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer

 

% Regional and/or distant residual disease

P

RR (CI 95%)

P

Cholecystectomy

 

0.975

 

0.975

 Urgent

7/16 (43)

 

1.02 (0.37–3.38)

 

 Elective

17/43 (39.5)

 

REF

 

Surgical approach

 

0.138

 

0.142

 Open or converted

10/19 (52.6)

 

2.03 (0.755–7.05)

 

 Laparoscopic

13/40 (32.5)

 

REF

 

Cystic margin invasion

 

0.658

 

0.660

 Yes

7/16 (43.8)

 

1.10 (0.25–4.79)

 

 Unknown

6/13 (46.2)

 

0.64 (0.18–2.23)

 

 No

10/30 (33.3)

 

REF

 

T-stage

 

0.003

 

0.021

 T3

7/8 (87.5)

 

13.12 (1.48–116.26)

 

 T2

16/46 (34.8)

 

REF

 

 Tis + T1a + T1b

0/5 (0)

 

 

Positive lymph nodes

 

0.412

 

0.420

 N+

8/15 (53.3)

 

2.00 (0.40–9.83)

 

 Unknown

11/33 (33.3)

 

0.87 (0.21–3.64)

 

 N0

4/15 (36.4)

 

REF

 

Grade

 

0.691

 

0.698

 Poorly

2/7 (28.6)

 

1.06 (0.12–8.79)

 

 Moderately

11/24 (45.8)

 

2.25 (0.47–10.64)

 

 Unknown

7/17 (41.2)

 

1.86 (0.36–9.63)

 

 Well

3/11 (27.3)

 

REF

 

Histology

 

0.241

 

0.247

 Other

6/11 (54.5)

 

2.18 (0.58–8.24)

 

 Adenocarcinoma

17/38 (35.4)

 

REF

 

Lymphovascular invasion

 

0.005

 

0.010

 Yes

11/15 (73.3)

 

6.05 (1.54–23.73)

 

 Unknown

2/12 (16.7)

 

0.44 (0.81–2.39)

 

 No

10/32 (31.3)

 

REF

 

Perineural invasion

 

0.016

 

0.024

 Yes

11/16 (68.8)

 

6.16 (1.41–26.75)

 

 Unknown

7/24 (29.2)

 

1.15 (0.29–4.3)

 

 No

5/19 (26.3)

 

REF

 
  1. Significant data are in bold