Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the clinical trials included in the meta-analysis

From: Does high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ of the biliary duct margin affect the prognosis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A meta-analysis

Study

Country

Study years

Sex (F/M)

Lymphatic invasion (yes/no)

Perineural invasion (yes/no)

Differentiation (well/moderate poor)

Median follow-up (months)

Location

Ductal resection margin status

Patients

Quality

Sasakai, 2007 [30]

Japan

1985–2005

NR

115/13

102/26

50/78

NR

Perihilar (n = 51)

Distal (n = 77)

R0

105

7

R1-CIS

12

R1-INV

11

Endo, 2008 [31]

USA

1992–2005

NR

NR

NR

NR

26 ± 2.5(1–103)

Perihilar (n = 82)

R0

66

7

R1-CIS

16

Igami 2009 [32]

Japan

1977–2005

162/309

NR

NR

NR

NR

Perihilar (n = 351) Distal (n = 120)

R0

410

6

R1-CIS

14

R1-INV

47

Nakanishi, 2010 [33]

Japan

1989–2007

25/100

NR

106/19

38/87

NR

Perihilar (n = 103) Distal (n = 22)

R0

96

8

R1-CIS

10

R1-INV

19

Wakai, 2011 [34]

Japan

1988–2007

41/69

NR

NR

27/83

99 (1–259)

Perihilar (n = 57)

Distal (n = 53)

R0

85

8

R1-CIS

14

R1-INV

11

Han, 2013 [35]

South Korea

1995–2007

129/335

NR

NR

NR

32 (1–181)

Perihilar (n = 208) Distal (n = 246) Diffuse (n = 10)

R0

340

8

R1-CIS

39

R1-INV

85

Oguro, 2015 [36]

Japan

2000–2011

49/100

NR

NR

42/107

26.5 (2.20–143.7)

Perihilar (n = 149)

R0

128

7

R1-CIS

21

Kurahara, 2016 [18]

Japan

2002–2014

27/73

NR

NR

49/51

25.3

Perihilar (n = 35)

Distal (n = 65)

R0

69

8

R1-CIS

16

R1-INV

15

Tsukahara, 2017 [19]

Japan

1998–2013

59/113

66/106

103/69

93/79

86.9

Perihilar (n = 144) Distal (n = 28)

R0

148

8

R1-CIS

18

R1-INV

6

Higuchi, 2017 [17]

Japan

2004–2013

58/105

NR

NR

NR

NR

Perihilar (n = 163)

R0

113

7

R1-HGD/CIS

22

R1-INV

28

Park, 2019 [12]

South Korea

2008–2016

83/110

NR

137/56

42/151

35.9 (22.4–58.4)

Distal (n = 193)

R0

174

7

R1-CIS/HGD

12

R1-INV

7