Table 2 Prognostic implications of linitis plastica in the literature

Aranha, 1989 [76]

Retrospective cohort

26

–

–

–

–

–

–

50

85

–

6.9

6.6

7.2

–

–

–

–

Not performed

Hamy, 1999 [77]

Retrospective cohort

86

–

5.5(T1 + T2)/4/90.5

–

–

–

–

86

69

–

–

–

12

–

50^d

40^d

10^d

Not performed

Kodera, 2004 [70]

Retrospective cohort

47

–

0/2/72/26

2/13/23/45

–

43

43

83

–

47

14

10

Not performed

Kodera, 2008 [75]

Retrospective cohort

178

–

-/-/-/89

15/23/21/41

–

–

44

84

77

45

13.8

7.8

–

30.2

–

–

–

Not performed

Schauer, 2011 [15]

Retrospective cohort

120

–

0/0/65/35

13/19/18/50

H1: 10%;

LYMPH1: 20%

16

33

100

62.5

69

8

–

8

17

–

–

8^d

Not performed

Endo, 2012 [16]

Retrospective cohort

19

5/5/58/32

0/11/68/21

N+: 89.5%

–

53

46

100

–

–

9^a

–

9^a

–

26^d

21^d

7^d

Not performed

Pedrazzani, 2012 [14]

Retrospective cohort

102

–

0/78(T2 + T3)/22

4/37/42/17

–

–

–

59

–

31

5.7

2.8

–

16

68^e

14^e

4^e

Not performed

Jafferbhoy, 2013 [19]

Case series

8

–

–

–

25

–

0

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Not performed

Blackham, 2016 [17]

Retrospective cohort

58

III-IV: 90%

2/2/43/53

15/14/28/43

–

–

–

100

88

34

11.6

–

11.6

21.5^a

–

24^d

15^d

No^b

Thompson, 2016 [78]

Retrospective cohort

54

–

6/12/53/29

24/24/6/41

52

–

–

31

–

35

–

3.6

16.7

–

–

–

–

No^c