Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of differing classifications of linitis plastica in the literature

From: The significance of a nineteenth century definition in the era of genomics: linitis plastica

Author, year

Country

Diagnostic criteria

Age

Gender % (M/F)

Histology

Aranha, 1989 [76]

USA

Scirrhous + extension (unclear)

62 (42–80)

42/58

100% poorly differentiated or anaplastic carcinoma, with or without signet ring cells

Hamy, 1999 [77]

France

Histology (infiltrating, SRCs)

63.4 ± 25.6

59/41

100% SRCs, 77% scirrhous

Kodera, 2004 [70]

Japan

Histology (scirrhous)

56.5 ± 11.6

53/47

Scirrhous

Kodera, 2008 [75]

Japan

Barium meal or endoscopy

59 ± 11.5

51/49

–

Schauer, 2011 [15]

Germany

Locally advanced + SRCs

57.7 (28–83)

1:1

Diffuse

Endo, 2012 [16]

Japan

Scirrhous + extension >2/3

69 ± 7.7

58/42

16% SRC carcinoma, 63% poorly differentiated, 21% moderately differentiated

Pedrazzani, 2012 [14]

Italy

Lauren diffuse + thickening of the gastric wall >1/3

68 (29–89)

56/44

Diffuse

Jafferbhoy, 2013 [19]

UK

Nonspecified

75 (59–87)

–

–

Blackham, 2016 [17]

USA

Endoscopic assessment or intraoperative assessment or histologic evaluation (Borrnann, scirrhous)

61.1 ± 13

47/53

98% poorly differentiated

2% moderately differentiated

Thompson, 2016 [78]

UK

Endoscopic or radiologic features (unclear)

69.6 ± 13.6

50/50

Diffuse