Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of patients group with para-aortic lymph node surgery

From: Role of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in abandoned radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer

 

Tumor removal and/or para-aortic biopsy

N = 14 (70.0%)

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy

N = 6 (30.0%)

p

Countrya

 Mexico (INCan)

5 (35.7)

2 (33.3)

0.26

 Colombia (ICLA)

9 (64.3)

4 (66.7)

Age (years)b

45 (40–45)

44.5 (42–50)

0.90

BMIb

26.55 (23.7–28.3)

23.9 (22.5–32.7)

0.60

Histologya

 Squamous

6 (42.9)

3 (50)

0.02

 Adenocarcinoma

5 (35.7)

3 (50)

 Adenosquamous

1 (7.1)

0

 Others

2 (14.3)

0

Initial clinical stagea

 IB1

12 (85.7)

6 (100)

<0.001

 IB2

2 (14.3)

0

Tumor size (cm)b

3.5 (2–4)

3.15 (2.9–4)

 

Tumor gradea

 Well-differentiated

4 (28.6)

3 (50)

0.95

 Moderately differentiated

3 (21.4)

3 (50)

 Poorly differentiated

7 (0.5)

0

LVSIa

3 (21.4)

0

0.09

PR positive

6 (42.9)

1 (16.7)

0.354

Surgical time (min)b

172.5 (90–195)

120 (100–195)

0.78

Blood loss (mm)b

100 (70–300)

140 (100–250)

0.72

Blood transfusiona

0

0

NS

Others complicationsa

0

1 (16.7)

<0.001

Hospital stay (days)b

2 (2–2)

2 (2–3)

0.44

Neoadjuvant treatment term (weeks)b

10.5 (8.2–14.2)

10.5 (8–15.4)

0.66

Recurrencea

 Local

0

1 (16.7)

<0.001

 Regional

3 (21.4)

0

 Distance

3 (21.4)

0

  1. Confidence interval 95%
  2. BMI body mass index, Mod moderate, LVSI lymphovascular space involvement, PR pathology report
  3. a N (relative frequency)
  4. bMedian (interquartile range)