Skip to main content

Table 4 Survival on breast IMPC and IDC in previous seven reports and the present study

From: Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast had poor clinical characteristics but showed no difference in prognosis compared with invasive ductal carcinoma

Author

Median follow-up (month)

OS (IMPC vs IDC)

FFS (IMPC vs IDC)

LRFS (IMPC vs IDC)

DMFS (IMPC vs IDC)

Chen [4]

60.1

59 vs 77 %

P = 0.004

/

88.8 vs 96 %

P = 0.055

61.2 vs 72 %

P = 0.108

Yu [8]

45.0

86 vs 87.7 %

P = 0.18

/

68.2 vs 81.4 %

P = 0.045

78.1 vs 79.3 %

P = 0.86

Vingiani [14]

51.0

89.8 vs 90.8 %

P = 0.8

75.5 vs 79.6 %

P = 0.47

/

/

Liu [9]

68.4

/

84.3 vs 78.4 %

P = 0.518

/

/

Shi [7]

40.5

75.9 vs 89.5 %

P = 0.001

67.1 vs 84.5 %

P < 0.001

/

/

Chen [10]

48.0

82.9 vs 80.5 %

P = 0.52

/

/

/

Yu [16]

59.0

97.7 vs 95.7 %

P = 0.67

/

91.8 vs 96.3 %

P = 0.03

/

Present study

39.0

97 vs 94.2 %

P = 0.78

87.9 vs 86.2 %

P = 0.91

93.9 vs 89.0 %

P = 0.82

90.9 vs 89 %

P = 0.97

  1. IMPC invasive micropapillary carcinoma, IDC invasive ductal carcinoma, OS overall survival, LRFS local relapse-free survival, DMFS distant metastasis-free survival, FFS failure-free survival