Skip to main content

Table 3 The statistic analyses of 29 pelvic GCT patients basing on the treatment group

From: Surgical treatment for pelvic giant cell tumor: a multi-center study

Categories

S (IL)

S (W)

Total

p

Number, n (%)

8 (27.6)

21 (72.4)

29 (100)

Age, year, means (SD)

34.8 (9.0)

41.0 (9.0)

39.2 (9.3)

0.732

Age group, n (%)

   

0.190

 <20

1 (12.5)

0 (0)

1 (3.4)

 

 20~29

0 (0)

2 (9.5)

2 (6.9)

 

 30~39

5 (62.5)

7 (33.3)

12 (41.4)

 

 40~49

2 (25.0)

7 (33.3)

9 (31.0)

 

 ≥50

0 (0)

5 (23.8)

5 (17.2)

 

Sex, n (%)

   

0.035

 Male

1 (7.1)

13 (92.9)

14 (48.3)

 

 Female

7 (46.7)

8 (53.3)

15 (51.7)

 

Location,a n (%)

   

0.691

 I

2 (25.0)

8 (38.1)

10 (34.5)

 

 II

4 (50.0)

7 (33.3)

11 (52.4)

 

 III

2 (25.0)

6 (28.6)

8 (27.6)

 

Follow-up, months, means (SD)

85.1 (52.1)

49.3 (35.4)

59.0 (42.7)

0.056

Recurrence, n (%)

   

0.814

 Exist

1 (12.5)

2 (9.5)

3 (10.3)

 

 None

7 (87.5)

19 (90.5)

26 (89.7)

 

Complication, n (%)

   

0.635

 Exist

1 (12.5)

6 (28.6)

7 (24.1)

 

 None

7 (87.5)

15 (71.4)

22 (75.9)

 

MSTS, means (SD)

25.4 (3.6)

21.9 (3.5)

22.8 (3.8)

0.024

  1. S (IL) intralesional curettage, S (W) wide resection
  2. aAccording to the classification system of Enneking and Dunham