Skip to main content

Table 4 Previous reports regarding surgical procedures for femoral metastatic lesions

From: Intramedullary nailing has sufficient durability for metastatic femoral fractures

Study

Number of case

IMN

EPR

Plating and cementation

Other procedure

Result (reoperation, complication)

Nilsson at al. [7] 2008

245

55 (22.4 %)

157 (64.1 %)

30 (12.2 %)

3 (1.2 %)

Reoperation: 1.8 % IMN, 9.1 % ORIF

Sarahrudi et al. [8] 2009

139

94 (67.6 %)

23 (16.5 %)

15 (10.8 %)

7 (5.1 %)

Complication: 3.2 % IMN, 8.6 % EPR, 20 % ORIF

Mavrogenis et al. [9] 2011

110

53 (48.2 %)

57 (51.8 %)

Complication: 1.9 % IMN, 8.8 % EPR

Weiss et al. [13] 2013

196

108 (55.1 %)

82 (41.8 %)

6 (3.1 %)

Reoperation: 9.3 % IMN, 6.1 % ORIF

Harvey at al. [10] 2012

159

46 (28.9 %)

113 (71.1 %)

Reoperation: 26.1 % IMN, 8.0 % EPR

Revision: 21.7 % IMN, 2.7 % EPR

Steensma at al. [11] 2012

298

82 (27.5 %)

197 (66.1 %)

19 (6.4 %)

Reoperation: 6.1 % IMN, 3.0 % EPR, 42.1 % ORIF

Alvi at al. [12] 2013

53

16 (30.2 %)

36 (67.9 %)

1 (1.9 %)

Revision: 35.6 % IMN

Current study

186

80 (43.0 %)

95 (51.1 %)

8 (4.3 %)

3 (1.6 %)

Revision: 3.8 % IMN

  1. IMN intramedullary nailing, EPR endoprosthetic reconstruction, ORIF open reduction and internal fixation