Skip to main content

Table 1 Accuracy of postoperative results compared with virtual surgical planning

From: Accuracy of using computer-aided rapid prototyping templates for mandible reconstruction with an iliac crest graft

No.

Gender/age (years)

Affected region

Distance of mandibular osteotomy (mm)

Volume of reconstructive graft (mm3)

   

Virtual

Actual

Error (%)

Virtual

Harvested (non-shaped)

Shaped

Error between virtual and harvested (%)

Error between harvested and shaped (%)

1

F/42

MRC

109.42

107.36

-2.06 (1.88%)

27505

29525.35

25918.03

2020.40 (7.35%)

3607.32 (12.22%)

2

M/54

PM

30.75

32.49

1.74 (5.66%)

7070.37

7676.48

6590.79

606.11 (8.57%)

1085.69 (14.14%)

3

M/20

MR

57.6

59.04

1.44 (2.50%)

13018.3

14534.42

13235.51

1516.16 (11.65%)

1298.91 (8.94%)

4

F/26

MRC

101.38

102.48

1.1 (1.09%)

19253.2

20806.81

18334.37

1553.59 (8.07%)

2472.44 (11.88%)

5

M/26

M

32.18

34.8

2.62 (8.14%)

7602.38

8805.98

7588.97

1203.6 (15.83%)

1217.01 (13.82%)

6

F/36

PMR

46.65

45.31

-1.34 (2.87%)

16718.9

18267.97

16070.04

1549.11 (9.27%)

2197.93 (12.03%)

7

M/22

MRC

110.02

106.32

-3.7 (3.36%)

20917.7

22686.75

19561.82

1769.01 (8.46%)

3124.93 (13.77%)

8

M/19

PM

39.35

41.85

2.5 (6.35%)

11739.6

12819.41

11068.84

1079.83 (9.20%)

1750.57 (13.66%)

Average

30.6 ± 12.4

 

65.92 ± 35.08

66.21 ± 33.42

2.06 ± 0.86 (3.13% ± 1.31%)

15478.17 ± 6997.65

16890.40 ± 7395.49

14796.05 ± 6504.39

1412.22 ± 439.24 (9.12% ± 2.84%)

2094.35 ± 929.12 (12.40% ± 5.50%)

  1. M, molar; MR, molar/ramus; MRC, molar/ramus/condyle; PM, premolar/molar; PMR, premolar/molar/ramus; -, indicates that the actual distance or volume errors were negative (errors not marked by ‘-’ mean that the actual distance or volume errors were positive).