Skip to main content

Table 1 Accuracy of postoperative results compared with virtual surgical planning

From: Accuracy of using computer-aided rapid prototyping templates for mandible reconstruction with an iliac crest graft

No. Gender/age (years) Affected region Distance of mandibular osteotomy (mm) Volume of reconstructive graft (mm3)
    Virtual Actual Error (%) Virtual Harvested (non-shaped) Shaped Error between virtual and harvested (%) Error between harvested and shaped (%)
1 F/42 MRC 109.42 107.36 -2.06 (1.88%) 27505 29525.35 25918.03 2020.40 (7.35%) 3607.32 (12.22%)
2 M/54 PM 30.75 32.49 1.74 (5.66%) 7070.37 7676.48 6590.79 606.11 (8.57%) 1085.69 (14.14%)
3 M/20 MR 57.6 59.04 1.44 (2.50%) 13018.3 14534.42 13235.51 1516.16 (11.65%) 1298.91 (8.94%)
4 F/26 MRC 101.38 102.48 1.1 (1.09%) 19253.2 20806.81 18334.37 1553.59 (8.07%) 2472.44 (11.88%)
5 M/26 M 32.18 34.8 2.62 (8.14%) 7602.38 8805.98 7588.97 1203.6 (15.83%) 1217.01 (13.82%)
6 F/36 PMR 46.65 45.31 -1.34 (2.87%) 16718.9 18267.97 16070.04 1549.11 (9.27%) 2197.93 (12.03%)
7 M/22 MRC 110.02 106.32 -3.7 (3.36%) 20917.7 22686.75 19561.82 1769.01 (8.46%) 3124.93 (13.77%)
8 M/19 PM 39.35 41.85 2.5 (6.35%) 11739.6 12819.41 11068.84 1079.83 (9.20%) 1750.57 (13.66%)
Average 30.6 ± 12.4   65.92 ± 35.08 66.21 ± 33.42 2.06 ± 0.86 (3.13% ± 1.31%) 15478.17 ± 6997.65 16890.40 ± 7395.49 14796.05 ± 6504.39 1412.22 ± 439.24 (9.12% ± 2.84%) 2094.35 ± 929.12 (12.40% ± 5.50%)
  1. M, molar; MR, molar/ramus; MRC, molar/ramus/condyle; PM, premolar/molar; PMR, premolar/molar/ramus; -, indicates that the actual distance or volume errors were negative (errors not marked by ‘-’ mean that the actual distance or volume errors were positive).