Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinical efficiency of three-port inflatable robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in mediastinal tumor resection

World Journal of Surgical Oncology volume 22, Article number: 83 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Aimed to assess clinical effect of three-port inflatable robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in mediastinal tumor resection by comparing results of the robot group with the video group.

Methods

Retrospectively analyze 179 patients diagnosed with anterior mediastinal tumor from May 2017 to August 2021. Two groups were divided according to the surgical approach, including 92 cases in the RATS group and 87 cases in the VATS group. The results were analyzed between two groups with variables of age, sex, BMI, tumor size, and diagnosis. Perioperative clinical data was gathered to compare.

Result

There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regards to demographic data and clinical features. There were no significant differences inoperative time and duration of chest tube via RATS vs. VATS. The intraoperative blood loss was statistically significantly different among the RATS and VATS groups (75.9 ± 39.6 vs. 97.4 ± 35.8 ml p = 0.042). The postoperative stay of patients in RATS group were significantly shorter than that in VATS group (2.3 ± 1.0 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4 day p = 0.035),

Conclusion

Three-port inflatable robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal tumor is feasible and reliable it is more advantageous, and it provides the surgeon with advice on treatment choice.

Introduction

In the realm of thoracic afflictions, mediastinal masses comprise approximately 3% of cases [1, 2]. Among these, anterior mediastinal lesions (AML) exhibit diverse clinical and pathological characteristics. Mediastinal goiter and thymoma are predominantly situated in the anterior mediastinum [3]. The cornerstone of multimodal therapy for AML is radical resection, with the choice of surgical approach generally determined by the size and nature (benign or malignant) of the tumors [4]. The conventional open transthoracic procedure is the gold standard for AML, while video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has gained widespread acceptance in the past decade, aiming to minimize surgical trauma, blood loss, postoperative complications, and shorten hospital stays [5,6,7]. However, VATS is constrained by its two-dimensional view and reduced dexterity. With advancements in surgical instrumentation, robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) offers superior dexterity and reduces surgeon fatigue. It features a surgeon-controlled stable 3D camera, an ergonomic operating position, and Endo-Wristed instruments with 7 degrees of freedom, making it particularly suitable for training novices [8,9,10]. Although there are only a few case reports discussing the advantages of RATS in AML, no consensus has been reached. To assess the therapeutic efficacy of RATS for AML, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the clinical outcomes of RATS. In this report, we delineate our surgical strategy and experience for anterior mediastinal lesions, presenting the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent surgical resection of anterior mediastinal lesions with the da Vinci robotic system at our institution.

Materials and methods

Patient

From May 2017 to August 2021, a total of 179 patients underwent resection of anterior mediastinal lesions at the Department of Thoracic Surgery in Nanjing Jinling Hospital. The diagnoses and clinical information were gathered by reviewing the patients’ medical records. Enhanced computed tomography scans (CT scans) were employed to pinpoint the location of the tumor. Patient inclusion criteria were as follows: (I) under 75 years of age, (II) diagnosed with resectable AML, and (III) willing to undergo RATS or VATS. Exclusion criteria consisted of: (I) tumor size larger than 8 cm, (II) poor cardiac or lung function, or severe arrhythmia. Demographic and clinical characteristics encompassed age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and underlying conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Tumor-related data included tumor size and type. Surgical-related data encompassed total operative time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of chest tube placement, volume of drainage, postoperative hospital stay, intraoperative adverse events, and complications. This study received approval from our Institutional Review Board, and written informed consent was obtained.

Surgical method

The surgical approach was tailored to the individual based on both tumor size and patient preference. Preoperative preparation adhered to the standard protocol for conventional anterior mediastinal surgery. Typically, the lateral approach was employed, either via the right or left side.

During the operation, the three-port technique was utilized, with the ports positioned as illustrated in Fig. 1. A 12 mm camera port was then inserted in the 5th intercostal space (ICS) at the anterior axillary line, followed by CO2 insufflation. Two 8 mm ports were inserted in the 3rd ICS at the anterior axillary line and in the 6th ICS at the middle axillary line, respectively. The grasping arm was inserted into the first port, and the dissecting arm was inserted into the second port. There are some representative chest computed tomography and intraoperative images depicting an anterior mediastinal lesion (See Fig. 2). The extent of the surgery encompassed all adipose tissue within the phrenic nerves on both sides. During the dissection of the superior thymus, care was taken to preserve the anatomical triangle formed by the Internal thoracic vein, Internal thoracic artery, and Superior Vena Cava, and dissection of the superior thymus was performed through this area. This method allowed for full exposure of the lower thyroid pole and the superior thymus pole at the root of the neck, enabling a more complete resection of the anterior mediastinal tumor. Additionally, it facilitated clear visualization of the brachiocephalic trunk, left common carotid artery, and trachea to prevent injury. Simultaneously, both sides of the pleura were kept intact to reduce the risk of extensive tumor spread in the contralateral pleural cavity and minimize lung adhesions for potential secondary surgeries (See Fig. 3). The completely resected anterior mediastinal tumor as show in Fig. 4.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Port positions for robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

(A, B) Representative computed tomography images of 2 patients with anterior mediastinal lesion. (C, D) A 31-year-old woman underwent robot-assisted thoracic surgery on December 16, 2019

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

A, The innominate vein was carefully dissected just above the right phrenic nerve. B, When dissect the thymus superior, keep the anatomical triangle of the Internal thoracic vein, Internal thoracic artery and Superior Vena Cava as far as possible, and conduct the grips to dissect the thymus superior through this area. C, The Left Internal thoracic vein was carefully dissected. D, Sweep the thymus and reduce misdamage in Brachiocephalic Trunk. E, The contralateral phrenic nerve was carefully dissected. F, Remove all of the pericardial surface fat

Full size image

Statistical analysis

Categorical data were presented as values and percentages, while continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The data were prospectively recorded using Microsoft Office Excel 2003 and analyzed utilizing SPSS (IBM). The comparison of continuous variables between groups was conducted using either Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, while the comparison of categorical data was performed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. A two-sided p-value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Fig. 4
figure 4

(A, B) Specimens harvested from AML patients after RATS

Full size image

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

In the retrospective analysis of clinical data from 179 patients at our hospital, 92 patients underwent RATS, comprising 47 men and 45 women, with a mean age of 50.4 ± 13.5 years. Additionally, 87 patients underwent VATS, including 39 men and 48 women, with a mean age of 51.5 ± 14.2 years. No significant differences were observed between the RATS and VATS-treated patients in terms of age, sex, or body mass index (BMI). Moreover, there were no significant differences in tumor size or pathological type between the two groups. The pathological types of anterior mediastinal lesions in our study included Thymoma, Thymic hyperplasia, Thymic carcinoma, Thymic cyst, and Lymphoma (refer to Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics
Full size table

Surgical related data

As depicted in Table 2, all patients underwent R0 resection, and the total operative time was comparable between the two groups (47.1 ± 9.6 vs. 51.3 ± 12.7 min, p = 0.218). In comparison to the VATS group, the RATS group experienced significantly less intraoperative blood loss (79.5 ± 39.6 vs. 97.4 ± 35.8 ml, p = 0.042). The volume of drainage did not exhibit a significant difference between the two groups (125.2 ± 34.5 vs. 128.8 ± 40.2, p = 0.644). There were no significant differences in the duration of the chest tube between RATS and VATS. RATS patients had shorter postoperative hospital stays compared with VATS patients (2.3 ± 1.0 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4 min, p = 0.035). Detailed complications, including fever, injury of the innominate vein, chest pain, pulmonary infection, wound infection, atelectasis, injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, and injury of the phrenic nerve, were similar between the two groups.

Table 2 Surgical related data
Full size table

Discussion

The prevalence of anterior mediastinal lesions is on the rise, primarily encompassing mediastinal goiter and thymoma [1,2,3, 11,12,13]. While some cases may not necessitate intervention, the potential for malignant tumors requires adherence to oncological principles, often calling for surgical intervention to enhance prognosis [14]. In recent years, minimally invasive techniques have garnered attention in the surgical management of anterior mediastinal lesions, as they ensure complete tumor resection without the drawbacks of open surgery. Notably, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has gained traction due to its perceived advantages, including low morbidity, shortened hospitalization, and comprehensive resection [4, 15,16,17]. However, the advent of robot-assisted technology has introduced a less invasive surgical approach with a broader operative field, enabling access to every aspect of the anterior mediastinum. Initially employed in cardiac surgery, robots were primarily utilized for procedures such as mitral valve repair, atrial fibrillation ablation, left ventricular bipolar pacing lead placement, and atrial septal defect repair [18, 19]. With the rich surgical experience of operators, some scholars have found that compared with video-assisted thoracoscopy, robotics has a steep learning curve, and with the increase of the number of operations, the operation time is also reducing [20, 21]. It is also gradually applied to other thoracic operations. Although, robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anterior mediastinal lesions have been recognized as feasible and safe [20, 22,23,24]. But no consensus on the surgical method of AML.

The three-port inflation robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal tumor resection primarily employs a lateral approach, facilitating artificial pneumothorax establishment in the affected side’s pleural cavity. This technique broadens the field of vision, aids in lung collapse, and exposes crucial structures such as the phrenic nerve, thymus vein, and innominate vein, thereby facilitating surgery. Typically, a right-side approach is adopted. Traditional thoracoscopy encounters challenges in thymoma removal and fat dissection, particularly at the contralateral hilum, diaphragmatic angle, neck root, and rear of the innominate vein. This method effectively accomplishes anterior mediastinal fat dissection, including intricate areas of operation.

The robot’s intricate installation process, taking nearly 10 min, results in the actual operation time being shorter for robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) compared to VATS. Intraoperative blood loss was observed to be less in the RATS group than in the VATS group. The robot’s advanced surgical instruments and expanded visual field facilitate superior vessel separation and protection, ultimately reducing intraoperative bleeding. With reduced bleeding, trauma, and correspondingly diminished drainage volume, the duration of chest tube placement is also shortened, leading to expedited patient discharge. Consequently, postoperative hospital stays for patients in the RATS group were notably shorter than those in the VATS group.

One of the common complications of mediastinal surgery is phrenic nerve injury, which can be as high as 7% when using certain energy equipment or when using blunt dissection [25]. By fully utilizing good energy devices and minimizing energy manipulation, it is best to set a sufficient distance between electric coagulation or electric cutting and the nerve to prevent heat damage postoperatively. The right thoracic approach generally displays the right phrenic nerve along the vena cava with minimal variation, whereas the left phrenic nerve can be clearly visualized and protected through the left thoracic approach. When tumors invade the phrenic nerve, it is typically possible to remove it entirely; while attempting to preserve the phrenic nerve as much as possible when the tumor invades it. The robotic anterior mediastinum tumor resection allows for a full, clear, and complete visualization of the phrenic nerve, and effectively reduces the likelihood of phrenic nerve injury. Some researchers have shown that the left-sided approach is better suited to protect the phrenic nerve, while it should be noted that a lack of familiarity with the placement of ports can lead to cardiac injury during left-sided thymectomy [26].

Innominate venous injury and bleeding during surgery is possible. When the patient is bleeding, especially from the left subclavian vein, identifying it is difficult. We usually use titanium clips, hom-look or 4 − 0 ETHI-CON barbed thread for continuous suture, and have achieved good results. When the tumor invades surrounding tissues, such as lung, left pericardium, pharyngeal muscle, or vessel, complete resection of the tumor with reduced surgical trauma to the patient can be achieved without an auxiliary hole, and the technique is feasible and reliable.

However, this study has some limitations, such as its retrospective nature and the fact that the technical procedure used depends on the surgeon and patient preferences. The small sample size may lead to selection bias.

In conclusion, this technique for the anterior mediastinum is safe and effective, and it offers the surgeon advice on treatment selection. Overall, the technique has several advantages.

Legends for illustrations:

Fig. 1: Port positions for robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). Fig. 2: (A, B) Representative computed tomography images of 2 patients with anterior mediastinal lesion. (C, D) A 31-year-old woman underwent robot-assisted thoracic surgery on December16, 2019. Fig. 3: A, The innominate vein was carefully dissected just above the right phrenic nerve. B, When dissect the thymus superior, keep the anatomical triangle of the Internal thoracic vein, Internal thoracic artery and Superior Vena Cava as far as possible, and conduct the grips to dissect the thymus superior through this area. C, The Left Internal thoracic vein was carefully dissected. D, Sweep the thymus and reduce misdamage in Brachiocephalic Trunk. E, The contralateral phrenic nerve was carefully dissected. F, Remove all of the pericardial surface fat. Fig. 4: (A, B) Specimens harvested from AML patients after RATS.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Chen K, Zhang X, Jin R, Xiang J, Han D, Zhang Y et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal masses: a single-institution experience. J THORAC DIS 2020 2020-02-01;12(2):105–13.

  2. Aroor AR, Prakasha SR, Seshadri S, Raghuraj ST. A study of clinical characteristicsof mediastinal mass. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;2014–02–01(2):77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Di Crescenzo V, Vitale M, Valvano L, Napolitano F, Vatrella A, Zeppa P et al. Surgical management of cervico-mediastinal goiters: Our experience and review of the literature. INT J SURG 2016 2016-04-01;28 Suppl 1:S47-53.

  4. Hwang SK, Park SI, Kim YH, Kim HR, Choi SH, Kim DK. Clinical results of surgical resection of mediastinal teratoma: efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery. SURG ENDOSC 2016 2016-09-01;30(9):4065–8.

  5. Gu Z, Chen C, Wang Y, Wei Y, Fu J, Zhang P, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open surgery for Stage I thymic epithelial tumours: a propensity score-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;54(6):1037–44. 2018-12-01.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rothermel L, Gilkeson R, Markowitz AH, Schroder C. Thoracoscopic resection of a giant teratoma compressing the right heart. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013 2013-09-01;17(3):594–7.

  7. Shintani Y, Funaki S, Nakagiri T, Inoue M, Sawabata N, Minami M et al. Experience with thoracoscopic resection for mediastinal mature teratoma: a retrospective analysis of 15 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013 2013-04-01;16(4):441–4.

  8. Hu X, Wang M. Efficacy and safety of Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) compare with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung lobectomy in patients with non-small cell Lung Cancer. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2019 2019-01-20;22(3):169–78.

  9. Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F, Quarati R, Testa S. Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. DIS COLON RECTUM 2008 2008-11-01;51(11):1627–32.

  10. Baik SH, Lee WJ, Rha KH, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Chi HS et al. Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms. SURG ENDOSC 2008 2008-03-01;22(3):792–7.

  11. Savitt MA, Gao G, Furnary AP, Swanson J, Gately HL, Handy JR. Application of robotic-assisted techniques to the surgical evaluation and treatment of the anterior mediastinum. ANN THORAC SURG 2005 2005-02-01;79(2):450–5, 455.

  12. Conkle DM, Adkins RJ. Primary malignant tumors of the mediastinum. ANN THORAC SURG 1972 1972-11-01;14(5):533–67.

  13. Burkell CC, Cross JM, Kent HP, Nanson EM. Mass lesions of the mediastinum. Curr Probl Surg. 1969;1969–06–01:2–57.

  14. Toker A, Sonett J, Zielinski M, Rea F, Tomulescu V, Detterbeck FC. Standard terms, definitions, and policies for minimally invasive resection of thymoma. J THORAC ONCOL 2011 2011-07-01;6(7 Suppl 3):S1739–42.

  15. Gossot D, Izquierdo RR, Girard P, Stern JB, Magdeleinat P. Thoracoscopic resection of bulky intrathoracic benign lesions. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007 2007-12-01;32(6):848–51.

  16. Yim AP. Video-assisted thoracoscopic management of anterior mediastinal masses. Preliminary experience and results. SURG ENDOSC 1995 1995-11-01;9(11):1184–8.

  17. Kern JA, Daniel TM, Tribble CG, Silen ML, Rodgers BM. Thoracoscopic diagnosis and treatment of mediastinal masses. ANN THORAC SURG 1993 1993-07-01;56(1):92–6.

  18. Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Gummert JF, Bucerius J et al. Computer-enhanced robotic cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001 2001-05-01;121(5):842–53.

  19. Falk V, Diegler A, Walther T, Autschbach R, Mohr FW. Developments in robotic cardiac surgery. CURR OPIN CARDIOL 2000 2000-11-01;15(6):378–87.

  20. Seong YW, Kang CH, Choi JW, Kim HS, Jeon JH, Park IK et al. Early clinical outcomes of robot-assisted surgery for anterior mediastinal mass: its superiority over a conventional sternotomy approach evaluated by propensity score matching. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2014 2014-03–01;45(3):e68-73, e73.

  21. Melfi F, Fanucchi O, Davini F, Viti A, Lucchi M, Ambrogi MC et al. Ten-year experience of mediastinal robotic surgery in a single referral centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012 2012-04-01;41(4):847–51.

  22. O’Sullivan KE, Kreaden US, Hebert AE, Eaton D, Redmond KC. A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2019 2019-03-01;8(2):174–93.

  23. Fok M, Bashir M, Harky A, Sladden D, DiMartino M, Elsyed H et al. Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Versus robotic-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy: systematic review and Meta-analysis. Innovations (Phila) 2017 2017-07-01;12(4):259–64.

  24. Kang CH, Hwang Y, Lee HJ, Park IK, Kim YT. Robotic thymectomy in Anterior Mediastinal Mass: propensity score matching study with Transsternal Thymectomy. ANN THORAC SURG 2016 2016-09-01;102(3):895–901.

  25. Hamdi S, Mercier O, Fadel E, et al. Is sacrifying the phrenic nerve during thymoma resection worthwhile? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45(5):e151–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Raza B, Dhamija A, Abbas G, Toker A. Robotic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis surgical techniques and outcomes. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13(10):6187–94.

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Hao Peng, YuanPeng He and Siqi Sheng contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, PR China

    Hao Peng, YuanPeng He, Maierhaba Maitiyasen, Jingfeng Li, Yvxuan Liu, Xinyu Hou & Jun Yi

  2. Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, PR China

    Siqi Sheng & Haizhu Song

  3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing University Of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, PR China

    Jing Chen

Authors
  1. Hao Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. YuanPeng He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Siqi Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maierhaba Maitiyasen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jingfeng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yvxuan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xinyu Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Haizhu Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jun Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

1. Authors make substantial contributions to conception and design, HP, HS, JY. 2. Acquisition of data HP, YPH, SS, JC. 3. Analysis and interpretation of data HP, YPH, MM, JFL. 4. Authors participate in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual contentAll author. 5. Authors give final approval of the version to be published. All authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Haizhu Song or Jun Yi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The authors are accountable for allaspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013) and the Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice from the International Conference on Harmonization. This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Nanjing Jingling Hospital. (approval number 2011NZKY-030-01). All patients enrolled completed the informed consent form. The study outcomes will not affect the future patient management. This study is based on data retrieved from a hospital medical record system. All personal data have been protected and secured according to current national and international laws.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, H., He, Y., Sheng, S. et al. Clinical efficiency of three-port inflatable robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in mediastinal tumor resection. World J Surg Onc 22, 83 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03357-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03357-x

World Journal of Surgical Oncology

ISSN: 1477-7819

Contact us