Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of the two groups after matching

From: Safety evaluation of curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients who underwent liver transplantation: a comparative study with conventional gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients

Variable

Matching set (1:4) (n = 159)

P value

Curative gastrectomy after LT (n = 32)

Conventional gastrectomy (n = 127)

Age

61.58 ± 8.33

61.22 ± 7.53

0.822

Gender

 > 0.999

 Male

28 (87.5)

111 (87.4)

 Female

4 (12.5)

16 (12.6)

BMI

23.06 ± 3.27

22.55 ± 2.87

0.420

Extent of gastrectomy

0.980

 Distal

23 (71.88)

91 (71.65)

 Total

9 (28.13)

36 (28.35)

Tumor stage

 > 0.999

 I

23 (71.88)

92 (72.44)

 II

5 (15.63)

19 (14.96)

 III

4 (12.5)

16 (12.6)

Comorbidity

0.005

 Yes

25 (78.13)

64 (50.39)

 No

7 (21.88)

63 (49.61)

ASA score

0.016

 1,2

26 (81.25)

121 (95.28)

 3

6 (18.75)

6 (4.72)

Combined resection

0.262

 Yes

4 (12.5)

8 (6.3)

 No

28 (87.5)

119 (93.7)

LN dissection

0.111

 Less than D2

22 (68.75)

65 (51.18)

 D2

10 (31.25)

62 (48.82)

Adjuvant chemotherapy

0.164

 Yes

5 (15.63)

35 (27.56)

 No

27 (84.38)

92 (72.44)

  1. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD or number (%)
  2. LT liver transplant, BMI body mass index, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification, LN lymph node, SD standard deviation