Skip to main content

Table 2 Physical examination, color Doppler ultrasound, MRI, and pathological effective multivariate logistic regression analysis

From: Application of triple evaluation method in predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer

 

MP grading

B

SE

Wald

ρ

OR

95% confidence interval

  

Lower limit

Upper limit

Clinic

The tumor is reduced during palpation.

-3.082

1.805

2.914

.088

.046

.001

1.578

There is no change in the size of tumor during palpation.

-2.903

2.245

1.672

.196

.055

.001

4.468

The tumor is soft during palpation.

1.272

.813

2.445

.118

3.567

.725

17.565

The tumor is hard during palpation.

22.247

2.838

61.438

.000

4,591,041,665.454

17,616,881.500

1,196,446,917,928.918

Ultrasound

The tumor is reduced based on ultrasound.

2.292

1.754

1.708

.191

9.891

.318

307.591

There is no change in the size of tumor based on ultrasound.

2.111

2.252

.879

.348

8.260

.100

682.047

The tumor blood flow shows progress based on ultrasound.

2.561

1.285

3.971

.046

12.949

1.043

160.741

The tumor blood flow does not reduce based on ultrasound.

.582

.619

.884

.347

1.790

.532

6.022

The preoperative curve is double inflow type.

-2.622

.891

8.658

.003

.073

.013

.417

MRI

The tumor is reduced based on MRI.

.774

.738

1.103

.294

2.169

.511

9.206

There is no change in the size of tumor based on MRI.

.774

.957

.655

.418

2.169

.333

14.145

  1. MP Miller–Payne grading system, pathologic evaluation of neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer, B regression coefficient, SE standard error