Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of characteristics in patients with and without pain after TACE

From: Construction of pain prediction model for patients undergoing hepatic arterial chemoembolization

Variables

Post-TACE pain

p value

Yes

(n = 100)

No

(n = 128)

Male

80 (80.0)

94 (73.4)

0.247

Age, years

58.5 ± 10.3

62.3 ± 9.9

0.004

Age ≥ 60 years

46 (46.0)

82 (64.1)

0.006

ECOG score

  

0.102

 0 ~ 1

92 (92.0)

124 (96.9)

 

 2

8 (8.0)

4 (3.1)

 

History of chronic liver disease

92 (92.0)

116 (90.6)

0.716

Previous post-TACE response

66 (66.0)

82 (64.1)

0.761

Intraoperative super-selected target vessels during TACE

96 (96.0)

120 (93.8)

0.450

Child–Pugh score

  

0.757

 Stage A

70 (70.0)

92 (71.9)

 

 Stage B

30 (30.0)

36 (28.1)

 

Tumor location

  

0.005

 Distance from liver capsule ≤ 1 cm

86 (86.0)

90 (70.3)

 

 Distance from liver capsule > 1 cm

14 (14.0)

38 (29.7)

 

Tumor size

  

0.001

 < 5 cm

38 (38.0)

76 (59.4)

 

 ≥ 5 cm

62 (62.0)

52 (40.6)

 

Number of tumors

  

0.343

 1

64 (64.0)

74 (57.8)

 

 ≥ 2

36 (36.0)

54 (42.2)

 

CNLC

  

 < 0.001

 Ia

0 (0.0)

1 (0.8)

 

 Ib

20 (20.0)

47 (36.7)

 

 IIa

8 (8.0)

24 (18.8)

 

 IIb

28 (28.0)

28 (21.9)

 

 IIIa

38 (38.0)

20 (15.6)

 

 IIIb

6 (6.0)

8 (6.3)

 

Using drug-loaded microspheres

20 (20.0)

12 (9.4)

0.022

Dosage of ultra-liquefied lipiodol

  

0.301

 < 10 ml

92 (92.0)

122 (95.3)

 

 ≥ 10 ml

8 (8.0)

6 (4.7)

 

THP mixed lipiodol chemoembolization

16 (16.0)

12 (9.4)

0.130

Add embolic material

80 (80.0)

94 (73.4)

0.247

PVTT

40 (40.0)

26 (20.3)

0.001

  1. Data are expressed as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation
  2. TACE transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, CNLC China Liver Cancer Staging, PVTT portal vein tumor thrombosis