Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included

From: Prognostic and clinicopathological value of Slug protein expression in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Country

MA (Year)

Stage

NP

MF (month)

Cut-off

Dilution

Location

Positive rate

Survival endpoints

HR(e)

NOS

Liu [10]

2013

China

52

I–IV

441

NR

Scores > 4

NR

NR

39.50%

OS, PFS

Reported

8

Wan [14]

2017

China

NR

NR

314

240

Scores ≥ 4

NR

nuclear

75.90%

OS, PFS

Reported

9

Wu [22]

2019

China

55.3

I–III

137

NR

Scores ≥ 3

1:50

nuclear

24.10%

OS, PFS

Curve

8

Gu [23]

2019

China

NR

I–IV

108

88.5

Scores ≥ 4

1:600

cytoplasm

46.30%

OS, PFS

Curve

9

Prasad [24]

2009

India

56

NR

98

NR

> 10%

1:50

nuclear

34%

NR

NR

7

Cao [25]

2015

China

NR

I–IV

200

NR

> 10%

1:50

nuclear

42%

NR

NR

7

Ito [27]

2015

Japan

54

IV

47

61

> 5%

1:500

nuclear

40%

PFS

Reported

9

Wu [26]

2012

USA

NR

I–III

113

NR

NR

1:100

nuclear

44%

OS

Reported

6

  1. NR not reported, MA mean age, NP No. of patients, MF median follow-up, e estimate, Cut-off: the threshold tumor cells was regarded as high expression, Positive rate proportion of high expression of slug protein, HR(e) the estimate of hazard ratio in the original articles, NOS the quality of the studies was assessed using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS)