Skip to main content

Table 7 Relationship between of TICAM2 expression and clinical characteristics of patients with CESC

From: Identification of a necroptosis-related prognostic gene signature associated with tumor immune microenvironment in cervical carcinoma and experimental verification

Gene

Characteristics

Total (N)

Odds ratio (OR)

P value

TICAM2

Age (≤ 50 vs. > 50)

304

0.447 (0.123–1.621)

0.219

BMI (≤ 25 vs. > 25)

259

1.924 (0.440–8.369)

0.381

Menopause status (Pre vs. Peri and Post)

231

0.590 (0.131–2.619)

0.488

Histological type (adenosquamous vs. squamous cell carcinoma)

304

0.144 (0.018–0.922)

0.053

T stage (T1 and T2 vs. T3 and T4)

241

0.074 (0.010–0.536)

0.009

N stage (N0 vs. N1)

193

0.624 (0.101–4.073)

0.614

M stage (M0 vs. M1)

126

0.454 (0.012–33.647)

0.690

Clinical stage (stage I and stage II vs. stage IV and stage III)

297

0.278 (0.063–1.258)

0.091

Histologic grade (G1 and G2 vs. G4 and G3)

272

3.791 (0.924–16.721)

0.070

Primary therapy outcome (SD and PR and CR vs. PD)

217

0.083 (0.009–0.783)

0.025

Radiation therapy (yes vs. no)

304

1.287 (0.356–4.799)

0.702

  1. Abbreviations: CESC Cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma, PD progressive disease, CR complete response, SD stable disease, PR partial response, BMI body mass index