Skip to main content

Table 2 Complaint suggestive of central venous port dysfunction and flow confirmation study outcomes

From: Effectiveness of a flow confirmation study of a central venous port of the upper arm versus the chest wall in patients with suspected system-related mechanical complications

 

Upper arm group (N = 26)

Chest wall group (N = 40)

P

Prolonged infusion time

12 (46.2%)

18 (45.0%)

0.56

 ▪ Temporary obstruction (relieved by strong flushing)

6

2

 

 ▪ Fibrin sheath formation

2

3

 

 ▪ Temporary catheter kinking

0

5

 

 ▪ Permanent catheter kinking

0

2

 

 ▪ No abnormal findings

4

6

 

Inability or resistance to inject saline

7 (26.9%)

10 (25.0%)

0.54

 ▪ Temporary obstruction (relieved by strong flushing)

4

2

 

 ▪ Fibrin sheath formation

1

1

 

 ▪ Permanent obstruction

1

3

 

 ▪ Temporary catheter kinking

0

2

 

 ▪ Permanent catheter kinking

0

1

 

 ▪ No abnormal findings

1

1

 

Subcutaneous extravasation of chemotherapy drug

2 (7.7%)

4 (10.0%)

0.56

 ▪ Catheter-related injury

0

2

 

 ▪ No abnormal findings

2

2

 

Inability to puncture the port

2 (7.7%)

4 (10.0%)

0.56

 ▪ Irreversible port reversal

1

1

 

 ▪ No abnormal findings

1

3

 

Swelling of the neck/arm

2 (7.7%)

2 (5%)

0.52

 ▪ Venous occlusion

1

0

 

 ▪ No abnormal findings

1

2

 

Pain of the neck/arm

1 (3.8%)

2 (5.0%)

0.66

 ▪ Venous occlusion

1

0

 

 ▪ Catheter-related injury

0

1

 

 ▪ Catheter malposition into IJV

0

1

 

Reason for CVP removal (N)

5 (19.2%)

12 (30.0%)

0.25

 ▪ Fibrin sheath formation

1

1

 

 ▪ Permanent obstruction

1

3

 

 ▪ Irreversible port reversal

1

1

 

 ▪ Venous occlusion

2

0

 

 ▪ Permanent catheter kinking

0

3

 

 ▪ Catheter-related injury

0

3

 

 ▪ Catheter malposition into IJV

0

1

 
  1. CVP Central venous port, IJV Internal jugular vein