Skip to main content

Table 1 Preoperative data of the studied groups

From: Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of Harmonic Focus versus monopolar electrocautery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast conservative surgery: a comparative study

Variables

HF group (n = 49)

CE group (n = 50)

p

Age (years), mean ± SD

49.51 ± 11.3

48.1 ± 11.1

0.53

Females, n (%)

48 (98)

48 (96)

0.51

BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD

30.65 ± 5.4

31 ± 6.5

0.78

Smoking, n (%)

7 (14.3)

7 (14)

0.96

Family history, n (%)

2 (4.1)

2 (4)

0.98

Comorbidities, n (%)

DM

13 (26.5)

12 (14)

0.77

HTN

13 (26.5)

12 (14)

0.77

Others

15 (30.6)

21 (42)

0.24

Histological type, n (%)

Invasive duct carcinoma

41 (83.7)

42 (84)

0.32

DCIS

4 (8.2)

7 (14)

Invasive lobular carcinoma

1 (2)

0

Invasive micropapillary carcinoma

2 (4.1)

0

Lobular carcinoma

1 (2)

0

Medullary BC

0

1 (2)

Receptors status, n (%)

ER positive

32 (65.3)

37 (74)

0.27

PR positive

30 (61.2)

31 (62)

0.32

Her2 positive

18 (36.7)

20 (40)

0.33

Pre-CTH tumor size (cm), mean ± SD

3.3 ± 0.6

3.2 ± 0.57

0.39

Post-CTH tumor size (cm), mean ± SD

1.6 ± 0.6

1.5 ± 0.58

0.13

Clinical nodes, n (%)

1

17 (34.7)

31 (62)

0.023

2

15 (30.6)

10 (20)

3

17 (34.7)

9 (18)

TNM stage, n (%)

I

3 (6.1)

3 (6)

0.15

II

22 (44.9)

28 (56)

III

29 (59.1)

19 (38)

Type of CTH, n (%)

AC + TH

6 (12.3)

13 (26)

0.17

AC + T

43 (87.7)

37 (74)

No. of cycles

4 cycles

1 (2)

1 (2)

0.34

6 cycles

48 (98)

47 (94)

8 cycles

0

2 (4)

Radiological response

CR

5 (10.2)

5 (10)

0.72

PR

38 (77.6)

39 (78)

SD

4 (8.2)

2 (4)

DP

2 (4.1)

4 (8)

 
  1. AC Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, HF Harmonic Focus, CE conventional electrocautery, DM diabetes mellitus, HTN hypertension, DCIS ductal carcinoma in situ, ER estrogen, PR progesterone receptor, T Taxol, TH trastuzumab, herceptin. Radiological response: CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, DP disease progression