Skip to main content

Table 1 Age and radiological features of the study group

From: Intra-mammary lymph nodes, an overlooked breast cancer prognostic tool?

Variables

Benign IMLNs (N = 42)

Malignant IMLNs (N = 48)

P-value

Age in years, mean ± SD

46.7 ± 10.2

49.54 ± 10.1

0.19A

Laterality, no. (%)

 Left

24 (57.1%)

21 (43.8%)

 

 Right

17 (40.5%)

26 (54.2%)

0.42C

 Bilateral

1 (2.4%)

1 (2.1%)

 

Tumor site, no. (%)

 Central

6 (14.3%)

7 (14.6%)

 

 LIQ

7 (16.7%)

2 (4.2%)

0.32C

 LOQ

3 (7.1%)

1 (2.1%)

 

 Multicentric

13 (31%)

23 (8.9%)

 

 UIQ

4 (9.5%)

4 (8.3%)

 

 UOQ

9 (21.4%)

11 (22.9%)

 

No. of IMLNs in radiology, no. (%)

 0

9 (21.4%)

17 (35.4%)

 

 1

29 (69%)

24 (50%)

 

 2

1 (2.4%)

5 (10.4%)

0.14C

 3

3 (7.1%)

2 (4.2%)

 

IMLN radiological diagnosis

Definitive

24 (57.1%)

23 (47.9%)

 

Likely

9 (21.4%)

8 (16.7%)

0.46C

Not identified as IMLN

5 (11.9%)

7 (14.6%)

 

Not identified at all

4 (9.5%)

10 (20.9%)

 

IMLN radiological criteria

 Benign

7 (16.7%)

3 (6.3%)

 

 Not identified

4 (9.5%)

10 (20.8%)

0.13C

 Suspicious

31 (73.8%)

35 (72.9%)

 

IMLN site radiologically, no. (%)

 LIQ

1 (2.4%)

1 (2.1%)

 

 LOQ

1 (2.4%)

5 (10.4%)

0.319C

 UIQ

6 (14.3%)

4 (8.3%)

 

 UIQ LOQ

1 (2.4%)

0

 

 UOQ

27 (64.3%)

27 (56.3%)

 

 UOQ UIQ

0

1 (2.1%)

 

 UOQ LOQ

1 (2.4%)

0

 

 UOQ UIQ

1 (2.4%)

0

 

IMLN site radiologically, no.

UOQ

29

28

0.93C

Non-UOQ

9

10

 

IMLN in other breast

4 (9.5%)

2 (4.2%)

0.277C

Preoperative FNAB of IMLN

9 (20.4%)

10 (20.8%)

0.51C

FNAB of IMLN findings

 Benign

2 (4.8%)

0

 

 Inconclusive

2 (4.8%)

1 (2.1%)

0.066C

 Suspicious

5 (11.9%)

6 (12.5%)

 

 Metastatic

0

3 (6.3%)

 

Axillary LN by ultrasound

 Non-specific

6 (14.3%)

2 (4.2%)

0.095C

 Pathological

36 (85.7%)

46 (95.8%)

 
  1. AUnpaired t test, BMann–Whitney, Cchi-square