Skip to main content

Table 2 Subgroup analysis based on the tumor size and the age

From: Individual or combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a time-to-event meta-analysis

Criteria

OS

RFS

NO. of studies

NP

HR (95% CI)

I2

p value Q test

No. of studies

NP

HR (95% CI)

I2

p value Q test

TACE+RFA vs. TACE

 ≤ 3cm

4

623

0.57 (0.41–0.81)

24%

0.27

2

365

0.47 (0.30–0.73)

62%

0.10

 > 3cm

9

1238

0.61 (0.52–0.73)

0%

0.63

3

598

0.56 (0.35–0.89)

67%

0.05

 Age < 60

6

783

0.61 (0.51–0.73)

0%

0.57

1

83

0.51 (0.30–0.87)

NA

NA

 Age ≥ 60

6

834

0.58 (0.46–0.74)

0%

0.74

4

531

0.46 (0.36–0.57)

9%

0.35

TACE+RFA vs. RFA

 ≤ 3cm

3

533

0.77(0.55–1.09)

22%

0.28

3

533

0.82 (0.57–1.19)

0%

0.91

 > 3cm

6

669

0.61 (0.49–0.76)

0%

0.54

5

678

0.55 (0.45–0.67)

0%

0.47

 Age < 60

5

799

0.61 (0.49–0.77)

41%

0.15

4

731

0.55 (0.43–0.70)

0%

0.68

 Age ≥ 60

4

318

0.72 (0.49–1.04)

0%

0.51

4

318

0.80 (0.58–1.11)

0%

0.63

  1. TACE transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, RFA radiofrequency ablation, NP number of patients, NA not applicable, HR hazard ratio, OS overall survival, RFS recurrence-free survival