Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcomes of the meta-analysis comparing 3D and 2D ET

From: Comparison between 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic thyroidectomy for benign and malignant lesions: a meta-analysis

Variables

No. of studies

Patients (3D vs 2D)

Heterogeneity

Model

WMD/RR, (95% CI)

P value

I2

P value

Procedure time

15

583/607

88.4%

0.000

Random

− 14.95 (− 18.48, − 11.42)

0.000

Blood loss

15

583/607

93.6%

0.000

Random

− 6.91 (− 9.20, − 4.62)

0.000

Postoperative drainage

13

511/535

69.0%

0.000

Random

− 2.98 (− 5.50, − 0.46)

0.000

Postoperative hospitalization

14

557/573

18.4%

0.253

Fixed

− 0.10 (− 0.21, − 0.01)

0.068

Postoperative complications

12

501/525

0.0%

0.959

Fixed

0.56a (0.41, 0.77)

0.000

LNDs

4

128/131

0.0%

0.782

Fixed

0.67 (0.19, 1.15)

0.006

Total cost

8

288/296

85.8%

0.000

Random

275.10 (− 188.57, 738.76)

0.245

  1. ET endoscopic thyroidectomy, 3D 3-dimensional, 2D 2-dimensional, LNDs the total number of lymph node dissections, WMD/RR weighted mean difference/relative risk, CI confidence interval
  2. aRelative risk