Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of CT features of SPNs

From: Differentiation of primary lung cancer from solitary lung metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

 

LC (n = 70)

LM (n = 129)

P value

Size (mm)

19.1 ± 5.5

14.9 ± 6.2

< 0.001

Cranio-caudal location

  

0.188

 Upper

35 (50.0)

52 (40.3)

 

 Non-upper

35 (50.0)

77 (59.7)

 

Axial location

  

0.105

 Central

12 (17.1)

12 (9.3)

 

 Peripheral

58 (82.9)

117 (90.7)

 

Margina

  

< 0.001

 Smooth

7 (10)

54 (41.9)

 

 Lobulated

30 (42.9)

68 (52.7)

 

 Spiculated

33 (47.1)

7 (5.4)

Density

  

< 0.001

 Solid

47 (67.1)

128 (99.2)

 

 Sub-solid

23 (32.9)

1 (0.8)

 

Air bronchogram

30 (42.9)

7 (5.4)

< 0.001

Cavitation

13 (18.6)

19 (14.7)

0.296

Pleural tags

41 (58.6)

25 (19.4)

< 0.001

Pleural abutment

32 (45.7)

53 (41.1)

0.528

Background emphysema

18 (25.7)

13 (10.2)

0.004

  1. Values in parentheses are percentages. Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation where applicable. Size is a quantitative feature. Cranio-caudal location, axial location, margin, density, air bronchogram, cavitation, pleural tags, pleural abutment, and background emphysema are qualitative features
  2. aPost hoc analysis was performed to compare the proportion of margin of SPNs between the two groups, smooth vs. lobulated, P = 0.005; smooth vs. spiculated, P < 0.001; lobulated vs. spiculated, P < 0.001. Significance level of 0.0167 takes into account the Bonferroni’s correction for post hoc analysis (0.05/3). Note: significant P values are shown in bold
  3. CT computed tomography, LC lung cancer, LM lung metastases, SPNs solitary pulmonary nodules