Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary data for studies comparing outcomes between diagnostic biopsy and confirmatory biopsy included for this review

From: Old men with prostate cancer have higher risk of Gleason score upgrading and pathological upstaging after initial diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author (year )

Study characteristic a

Patient characteristic

Study region (interval)

Study size, n

No. Upgrading, n (%)

Definition of upgrading (from bGS to pGS)

Mean age, years

Mean PSA, ng/mL

Mean PV, mL

bGS

Clinical T-stage

No. cores obtained, n

Anderson 2015 [32]

USA (1991–2001)

646

55 (8.5)

≤ 6 to ≥ 7

NA

NA

NA

≤ 6

T1c–2a

Median 12, IQR 11–12

Dai 2019 [33]

USA (2005–2015)

406

85 (20.9)

≤ 6 to ≥ 7

NA

NA

NA

≤ 6

T1–2

12

Herrera-Caceres 2020 [34]

Canada (2006–2018)

726

159 (21.9)

≤ 6 to ≥ 7

NA

NA

NA

≤ 6

NA

Median 12, IQR 10–12

  1. PSA prostate-specific antigen, PV prostate volume, bGS biopsy Gleason score, pGS prostatectomy Gleason score, NA not available, IQR interquartile range
  2. aAll studies were case-control designs