Skip to main content

Table 1 Patients’ characteristics

From: Fecal incontinence after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer—impact of potential risk factors and pelvic intraoperative neuromonitoring

 

Non-pIONM group

(n = 23)

pIONM group

(n = 29)

p

Sex, M/F

12/11

26/3

0.003

Age, years

64 (58, 73)

63 (55, 74)

0.768

Body mass index, kg m-2

26 (23, 31)

26 (24, 31)

0.775

ASA classification, I/II/III/IV

2/15/5/1

1/16/12/0

0.308

pT-category (n)

  

0.828

 yT0

1

0

 

 T1 (yT1)

3 (0)

4 (2)

 

 T2 (yT2)

5 (2)

5 (5)

 

 T3 (yT3)

10 (2)

5 (8)

 

UICC classification (n)

  

0.326

 I

9

14

 

 II

8

4

 

 III

2

5

 

 IV

4

6

 

Tumor site (n)

  

0.365

 Middle rectal third (< 6 cm from anal verge)

17

19

 

 Lower rectal third (6 to ≤ 12 cm from anal verge)

6

10

 

Anterior quadrant involvement (n)

19

20

0.211

Neoadjuvant CRT

6

12

0.196

Open/laparoscopic

21/2

24/5

0.318

Stapled anastomosis (n)

  

0439

 Colorectal

18

21

 

 Coloanal

5

8

 

Reconstruction (n)

  

0.101

 End-to-End

7

12

 

 Side-to-End

8

14

 

 J-Pouch

8

3

 

Intraoperative blood loss, ml

300 (100, 600)

500 (50, 750)

0.773

Blood transfusion, units

0 (0, 0)

0 (0, 0)

0.768

Anastomotic leakage (n) a

0

1

0.558

pR0, pR2 (n)

19, 4

23, 6

0.525

pCRM negative, > 1 mm (n)

23

29

 

M.E.R.C.U.R.Y. Graduation (n)

  

0.588

 I°, complete

22

27

 

 II°, nearly complete

1

2

 

 Local recurrence

0

0 k

 
  1. Values are reported as median (interquartile range) or the number of patients
  2. M male, F female, ASA American Society of Anesthesiologists, UICC Union Internationale Contre le Cancer, LAR low anterior resection, pIONM pelvic intraoperative neuromonitoring, CRM circumferential resection margin involvement
  3. aManaged conservatively; statistical significance was defined as p<0.05