Skip to main content

Table 4 Scientific agreement of formulated recommendations for management of malignant pleural effusion

From: Quality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites

Recommendations

ATS, 2018 [5]

ERS, 2018 [2]

BTS, 2010 [3]

CGDTMPE, 2014 [4]

CSCO, 2018 [1]

CTS, 2009 [6]

JSPM1, 2016 [7]

JSPM2, 2016 [8]

Known or suspected malignant pleural effusion

 Asymptomatic

  Should pleural intervention be performed?

—

—

80~100%

80~100%

—

—

—

—

 Symptomatic

  Should pleural interventions guided by ultrasound?

—

—

80~100%

80~100%

—

80~100%

—

80~100%

  Should large-volume thoracentesis be performed?

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

IPCs or pleurodesis

 Expandable lung

  Should IPCs or chemical pleurodesis be used as first-line definitive pleural intervention?

—

80~100%

40~60%

40~60%

—

40~60%

—

40~60%

  Should talc poudrage or talc slurry be used?

—

0~20%

80~100%

80~100%

—

40~60%

—

—

 Nonexpandable lung, failed pleurodesis, loculated effusion

  Should IPCs or chemical pleurodesis be used as first-line definitive pleural intervention?

—

80~100%

80~100%

80~100%

—

—

—

—

 Other management

  Should medical therapy alone or medical therapy and catheter removal be used in IPC-associated infection?

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

  1. Measurement Scale of Rate of Agreement: 0~20% radically different, 20~40% numerous major scientific disagreements present, 40~60% few major scientific disagreements present, 60~80% only minor scientific disagreements present, and 80~100% absolute scientific agreement. In blank fields, no information is available