Skip to main content

Table 3 The prognostic factors for unconventional metastatic patients in the PG group

From: Regional metastasis to anatomies beyond traditional neck dissection boundaries: a multi-institutional analysis focused on unconventional metastases in oral cancer patients

Variables

The overall survival rate

p Value

Univariate Analysis

Cox Modela

Age

 

0.347

NA

 31–59(11)

45.5%

 60–87(14)

64.3%

Gender

 

0.968

NA

 Male(13)

53.8%

 Female(12)

58.3%

Histories of smoking or alcohol

 

0.617

NA

 Yes(13)

61.5%

 No(12)

50.0%

Premalignant mucosal diseases

 

0.957

NA

 Yes(12)

58.3%

 No(13)

53.8%

Primary site

 

0.251

NA

 Buccal mucosa(1)

None

 Upper gingiva(1)

None

 Lower gingiva(5)

80.0%

 Tongue(11)

54.5%

 Carcinoma of lip(4)

33.3%

 Retromolar trigone(1)

None

 Hard palate(2)

50.0%

Unconventional metastatic subsites

 

0.183

NA

 Buccinator (10)

60.0%

 Sublingual(12)

66.7%

 Parotid(3)

None

Pathological grade

 

0.009

NA

 II(17)

29.4%

 III(8)

25.0%

TNM staging

 

0.197

NA

 T1/T2(6)

100.0%

 T3/T4(19)

42.1%

Number of metastatic lymph nodes in the unconventional sites

 

0.037

NA

 1(19)

68.4%

 2(6)

16.7%

Lymph nodes size of UMLNs

 

0.041

NA

 0–3 cm(22)

63.6%

 > 3 cm(3)

None

Extranodal extension (ENE) in UMLNs

 

0.013

NA

 Yes(4)

None

 No(21)

66.7%

Contralateral metastasis

 

0.019

NA

 Yes(7)

28.6%

 No(18)

66.7%

Cervical lymph node metastasis

 

0.197

NA

 Yes(19)

42.1%

 No(6)

100.0%

Neck dissections

 

0.010

NA

 ISND(9)

77.8%

 IRND(8)

62.5%

 BND(8)

25.0%

Extranodal extension (ENE) in cervical lymph nodes

 

0.002

0.006

 Yes(8)

12.5%

 No(17)

76.5%

Postoperative adjuvant therapies

 

0.470

NA

 Radiotherapy(13)

53.8%

 Radio-chemotherapies(8)

37.5%

 None(4)

16.7%

sDepth of invasion

   

 > 10 mm(12)

25%

0.014

0.021

 < 10 mm(13)

84.6%

Perineural invasion (PNI)

   

 Yes(9)

22.2%

0.016

NA

 No(16)

75.0%

  1. NA not available
  2. aCox analysis for PG group only