Skip to main content

Table 2 A synopsis of published series on the surgical treatment of PCa

From: A novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Reference

Treatment

No. of patients

OT (min)

EBL (ml)

Drainage days (days)

Hospitalization days (days)

Complications (%)

PSM (%)

Zhu et al. [28]

Single-port LRP

6

252.5

300

11

NA

33

0

Zhang et al. [29]

Two-port LRP

15

170.1

100.7

5.7

NA

13.3

13.3

İnkaya et al. [30]

ORP

128

160

1600

NA

9

81.25

33.04

Yaxley et al. [15]

ORP

151

234.34

1338.14

8.42

3.27

10.6

8.0

İnkaya et al. [30]

Conventional LRP

48

248

183

11.6

3.68

8.3

12.5

Papachristos et al. [31]

Conventional LRP

100

195

300

NA

2

12

13

Sirisopana et al. [32]

Conventional LRP

241

210

500

NA

6

29.05

40.63

Johnson et al. [33]

Conventional LRP

544

213

NA

10.6

3.2

19.1

27.6

Qi et al. [34]

Conventional LRP

74

143.8

316.89

4.77

7.09

NA

45.9

Yaxley et al. [15]

RARP

157

222.03

443.74

8.21

1.55

4.5

11.0

İnkaya et al. [30]

RARP

778

206

172

9.2

3.02

2.4

17.0

Papachristos et al. [31]

RARP

100

195

300

NA

2

9

10

Sirisopana et al. [32]

RARP

295

200

300

NA

6

8.81

39.15

Johnson et al. [33]

RARP

1081

135

NA

13.3

2.9

16.4

22.5

Tasci et al. [35]

RARP

1499

181.9

225.4

2.3

2.9

6.1

14.1

Kaouk et al. [36]

Single-port RARP

10

197.5

143

8

0

0

50.0

Dobbs et al. [37]

Single-port RARP

10

234

65

1.3

1.3

0

20.0

Our series

Three-port LRP

144

113.8

94.2

4.0

5.1

3.7

27.8

  1. PCa prostate cancer, ORP open radical prostatectomy, LRP laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, RARP robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, No. number, OT operative time, EBL estimated blood loss, PSM prostate surgical margin, NA not available