Skip to main content

Table 3 Prognostic evaluation of clinicopathological parameters for cancer-specific survival in 36 cases of metastatic renal cell carcinomas by univariate and multivariate analyses

From: A risk stratification model based on four novel biomarkers predicts prognosis for patients with renal cell carcinoma

  

Univariate

Multivariate

 

n

HR

(95% CI)

p value†

HR

(95% CI)

p value†

Sex

(male/female)

30/6

2.56

(0.68–9.76)

0.164

  

Age, years

(> 62 vs ≤ 62)

18/18

0.52

(0.17–1.57)

0.247

  

Histological subtype

(non-clear vs clear)

5/31

0.65

(0.08–5.25)

0.652

  

T classification

(3,4 vs 1,2)

20/16

2.83

(0.89–9.00)

0.077

  

Vascular invasion

(yes vs no)

34/2

25.44

(0.02–44141)

0.395

  

Pathological grade

(3 vs 1,2)

13/23

4.82

(1.36–17.06)

0.015

1.24

(0.25–6.17)

0.792

Metastasis at diagnosis

(yes vs no)

27/9

5.41

(1.16–25.26)

0.032

6.26

(1.19–33.00)

0.031

Molecular targeting therapy (yes vs no)

25/11

1.33

(0.44–4.00)

0.617

  

ARL4C expression

(high vs low)

15/21

4.20

(1.39–12.72)

0.011

2.37

(0.52–10.51)

0.273

ECT2 expression

(high vs low)

15/21

2.85

(0.87–9.34)

0.084

  

SOD2 expression

(high vs low)

12/24

4.07

(1.28–12.94)

0.018

4.97

(1.12–22.02)

0.035

STEAP3 expression

(high vs low)

8/28

5.16

(1.56–17.08)

0.007

2.19

(0.45–9.970)

0.343

  1. †Cox proportional hazards regression models
  2. HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval