Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of the included studies

From: Meta-analysis of laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE-LAR) versus abdominal incision specimen extraction (AISE-LAR) for sigmoid or rectal tumors

Study

Year

Region

Study design

Participates (counting)

Age a (year)

Gender (male/female)

Tumor location

Specimen extraction site

NOS score

NOSE-LAR group

AISE-LAR group

NOSE-LAR group

AISE-LAR group

NOSE-LAR group

AISE-LAR group

Hisada et al.

2014

Japan

Retrospective study

20

50

63.7 (9)

66.3 (11)

12/8

NR

Rectum

Anus

5

Hu et al.

2019

China

Retrospective study

26

26

63.1 (8.3)

61.5 (7.6)

17/9

15/11

Rectum

Anus

7

Ng et al.

2018

China

Retrospective study

35

38

65.14 (9.14)

63.95 (9.19)

20/15

22/16

Sigmoid or rectum

Anus

8

Zhang et al.

2014

China

Retrospective study

65

132

56.1 (9.3)

55.5 (9.5)

32/33

57/75

Sigmoid or rectum

Anus

6

Zhou et al.

2019

China

Retrospective study

52

52

55.6 (10.4)

57.0 (10.7)

27/25

27/25

Sigmoid or rectum

Anus

8

Xing et al.

2017

China

Retrospective study

16

32

61.9 (11.8)

62.4 (12.0)

12/4

24/8

Sigmoid

Anus

7

Liu et al.

2019

China, Russia

Retrospective study

356

412

64 (29–79)

62 (32–81)

192/164

235/177

Rectum

Anus or vagina

6

Saurabh et al.

2017

Taiwan

Retrospective study

82

106

63.3 (13.9)

64.7 (10.9)

47/35

65/41

Sigmoid or rectum

Anus

6

Denost et al.

2015

France

Retrospective study

122

98

63 (20–90)

65 (25–85)

70/52

69/29

Rectum

Anus

7

Wang et al.

2019

China

Retrospective study

30

37

58.67 (8.45)

59.70 (10.88)

19/11

20/17

Rectum

Anus

7

  1. Abbreviations: NOSE-LAR laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction, AISE-LAR laparoscopic anterior resection with abdominal incision specimen extraction, NOS Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, NR not record
  2. aReported as mean ± standard deviation or median (range)